Stokes Sounds Off: Church unit growth from last Sunday

Search This Blog

Leaderboard

Tuesday, June 27, 2017

Church unit growth from last Sunday

In a recent post a day or two ago, I had reported the latest unit creation information, and thrown out some potential figures for continued unit growth in 2017. In checking into such developments just a few minutes ago, I found that the Church created 1 district and 3 new stakes last Sunday (one of which was upgraded from a district). There has also been the report of several Church units being created. You can track the changes reported on the LDS Church Temples site here, where the creation of stakes and districts is followed half-way down the page by the specific changes in wards and branches, and you can also depend on a more thorough analysis of these developments by Matthew Martinich on the the LDS Church Growth Blog, which can be found here. For now, I will leave things at that.

No comments:

Post a Comment

In addition to my life-long love for the subjects which I cover in the posts of this blog, I have long held the belief that we can disagree without becoming disagreeable. Differences of opinion are natural, while being disagreeable in expressing those differences is not. And in that sense, I have no desire to close the door on anyone who earnestly desires to contribute to the ongoing dialogue on subjects covered in the posts on this blog.

At the same time, however, I recognize that we live in a time when incivility, discourtesy, unkindness, and even cyber-bullying has regrettably become part of online interactions. With that in mind, while anyone who wishes can comment on anything if they choose to do so, I hereby reserve the right to immediately delete any comments which are critical, unkind, lack civility, or promote prodcuts, services, and values contrary to either the Church, or to the rules of online etiquette.

I'd also like to remind all who comment here that I try to respond personally to each individual comment as I feel is appropriate. Such replies are not meant to end the conversation, but to acknowledge earnest feedback as it is submitted.

And in order to better preserve the spirit and pure intentions for which this blog was established, I also hereby request that anyone not commenting with a regular user name (particularly those whose comments appear under the "Unknown" or "Anonymous" monikers, give the rest of us a name to work with in addressing any replies. If such individuals do not wish to disclose their actual given names, a pseudonym or nickname would suffice.

Any comments made by individuals who opt to not give a name by which they can ber identified may, depending on the substance and tone of such comments, be subject to deletion as well. I would respectfully ask that all of us do all we can to keep the dialogue positive, polite, and without malice or ill-will. May the Lord bless us all in our discussion of these important matters.