Stokes Sounds Off

Search This Blog

Leaderboard

Monday, January 8, 2018

Some Observations About Recent Times When Two (or more) New Apostles Were Appointed

Hello again, everyone! I have not had much to blog about today, but I am posting now with some observations about times when two or more new apostles were appointed, and how that changed the way General Conference looked.

As many of you may recall, the Church noted prior to the October 2015 General Conference that there had not been three vacancies in the Quorum of the Twelve Apostles since 1906. So let's start there. The appointment of three new members of the Quorum of the Twelve Apostles became necessary in April 1906 due to the resignation of John W. Taylor (son of 3rd Church President John Taylor) and Matthias F. Cowley (from whose family line Matthew Cowley would later be called as an apostle as well) in late October 1905.

Their resignation came in protest of the Church (then led by Joseph F. Smith) reemphasizing the importance of the manifesto, originally issued by Wilford Woodruff, although a second manifesto to validate and clarify the intent behind the first was issued under President Smith. So that left two vacancies in the Quorum. The following February, another member of the Quorum Marriner W. Merrill, passed away. Since the other two vacancies had not yet been filled, that left the Quorum with 9 members, which resulted in the April appointment of George F. Richards, Orson F. Whitney, and David O. McKay.

The next time two apostles were ordained on the same day was when the 1943 deaths of Sylvester Q. Cannon and Rudger Clawson left two vacancies in the Quorum of the Twelve. As some of you may know, Spencer W. Kimball and Ezra Taft Benson, who would both serve as Presidents of the Church, were appointed to fill those vacancies during the October Conference of that year.

Then, in January 1983, the death of Mark E. Petersen left a vacancy in the Quorum that was not filled for over a year, by which time fellow apostle LeGrand Richards had also passed away (with the deaths of the two, oddly enough, coming exactly a year apart, as both occurred on January 11).

To fill those vacancies, the Church in April 1984 sustained Russell M. Nelson and Dallin H. Oaks, although the latter was not able to be formally ordained and assume his new role until more than a month later. For that reason, while then-Elder Nelson gave his response to the call in the conference in which the two were sustained, Elder Oaks would have to wait until the following October to do so.

The Church did not see more than one vacancy in the apostleship again until Elders Neal A. Maxwell and David B. Haight passed away 10 days apart in July 2004 (with the passing of the former on July 21 coinciding with his 23rd anniversary as a member of the Quorum of the Twelve Apostles. and the latter passing away on July 31).

As we all remember, Elders Dieter F. Uchtdorf and David A. Bednar were called to fill the resulting vacancies. Another 11 years would pass before the next time when more than one apostle was called at the same time.

By that time (in 2015), we had seen the deaths of Elders L. Tom Perry and Richard G. Scott (on May 30 and September 22 respectively), and also the death of Quorum President Boyd K. Packer (on July 3). So the Church called 3 apostles at the same time for the first time since 1906, and those 3, as we know, were Elders Ronald A. Rasband, Gary E. Stevenson, and Dale G. Renlund.

For both the October 2004 & 2015 General Conferences, the Church did things a little differently in General Conference. Typically, as I have previously noted, we see 2 apostles each speak in the Saturday & Sunday Morning Sessions, 4 during Saturday Afternoon, 1 during the Priesthood Session, and the final 3 during the Sunday Afternoon Session.

But for the two conferences above, while we saw 2  members of the Quorum of the Twelve each speak during the Saturday Morning and Sunday Afternoon Sessions, there were 3 in the Saturday Afternoon Session, 1 more in the Priesthood Session, and the remaining 4 during the Sunday Morning Session, which meant that the entire Sunday Morning Session of the October 2004 General Conference comprised of talks from apostles, the two new members, two other veteran apostles (Elders Nelson and Hales) and two First Presidency members (Presidents Monson and Hinckley).

By slight contrast,  by the time the October 2015 General Conference had rolled around, the three newest apostles opted to do short addresses (speaking for 5-7 minutes each), and President Monson also gave very brief remarks. The remaining time went to the new President of the Quorum of the Twelve Apostles (President Nelson), President Henry B. Eyring, and General Authority Seventies Elder Gregory A. Schwitzer & Claudio R. M. Costa.

So in addition to what I have posted about how the General Conference layout changes with a new Church president having his call sustained in a Solemn Assembly, we also will have a situation where the new Church President (President Nelson) will have his first opportunity to address the Church as a whole. Since he is in much better health than his predecessor, I would anticipate that the pattern for apostolic speaking that held for the October 2004 and October 2015 General Conferences will be true here, and also that the layout of the Sunday Morning Session will likely look more like it did for the former conference than it wound up being for the October 2015 General Conference.

One interesting thing struck me: President Nelson has been (or will be) involved in all three of those Sunday Morning Sessions that were exceptions to the general rule. He was the veteran apostle that was asked to speak after Elders Uchtdorf and Bednar's first addresses in October 2004, and after new apostles Elders Rasband, Stevenson, and Renlund gave their first talks in October 2015, he had his first opportunity to address the Church as the new President of the Quorum of the Twelve Apostles. And now, as President of the Church, he will likely be the last speaker in the Sunday Morning Session of the April 2018 General Conference.

As I have previously noted, I have adjusted my predictions according to what I have felt most likely will happen. But if the reorganization of the First Presidency does not follow in either the timing or the manner that I think it will, that will change the layout of those predictions yet again.

Thanks for wading through these thoughts. That does it for this post. Any and all comments, are as always, welcome and appreciated. Thank you for the privilege of your time. Until my next post, I wish each one of you all the best and pray that the Lord will bless you all in everything you do.

Sunday, January 7, 2018

Updated Temple Developments

Hello again, everyone! I am posting today to pass along some significant temple-related developments that have come to my attention within the last 24-48 hours or so. and which are well worth mentioning on this blog. So let's get right into all of that.

First of all, I have offered my opinion previously that the Church could have 200 temples by the time it marks its' bicentennial anniversary (which will occur on Saturday April 6, 2030). With that milestone being just 12.24 years or so from now, and with 41 temples to  complete by that time (23 in various stages of that process, and 18 new temples that will also need to be announced, constructed, and dedicated by that time), the Church would need to complete around 3.35 temples per year between now and then. As I have previously observed, that not only seems likely, but very reasonably doable, whether or not an official goal is made to do so.

Moving on now to new temples under construction, it was recently reported that the Arequipa Peru Temple has had scaffolding installed around the top of the temple as efforts turn to the roof and the steeple of that edifice. Meanwhile, the installation of temporary windows to enclose that structure continues.

Turning now to the Rio de Janeiro Temple, by all  reports, it would appear that this temple may be larger than originally reported, which explains the shift in its' completion estimate. That temple has recently seen rebar installed in preparation for the pouring of the steeple base.

With the knowledge that the temple in Rio de Janeiro is only anticipated to be completed during early 2020, it will be interesting to see if that temple is dedicated before or after the Winnipeg Manitoba Temple. Though I have kept my eyes open for information on this, I have not yet  been able to ascertain whether or not the modification of the plans for that temple will change the estimate of 20 months that was previously offered for that temple's construction process. And, of course, with another winter having set in in Winnipeg, full-scale efforts might only begin in April or May of this year.

In the meantime, the final update I wanted to note is that the Raleigh North Carolina Temple is now officially closed for its' renovation. The thing that struck me as interesting is that, while I originally offered my thoughts that that temple could be rededicated sometime during mid-to-late 2019, there may now be reason to believe that it will be completed a bit earlier, in mid-2019. I have not seen anything in that altered estimate that might point to a need to again change the estimated time-frame i have previously offered, but I am keeping my eyes open for information in that regard, and will adjust my thoughts accordingly.

As I keep saying, it is wonderful to see so many great updates on temple construction worldwide on a day-to-day or week-to-week basis, and I will do my very best to pass along any and all subsequent updates in that regard as I become aware of them. That does it for this post. Any and all comments are, as always, welcome and appreciated. Thank you for the privilege of your time. Until my next post, I wish each one of you all the best and pray that the Lord will bless you all in everything you do.

Saturday, January 6, 2018

Exploring Where President Nelson Will Rank Among His Prophetic Predecessors

Hello again, everyone! With just short of a week left until funeral services are held to honor the life of President Thomas S. Monson, and noting that it will, at earliest, be a couple of days after that (Sunday January 14) before the First Presidency is reorganized, and still another day before the new First Presidency will meet the press and take questions from media representatives, I wanted to take a moment in this post to pass along some data I have compiled regarding where President Nelson will fit in with his prophetic predecessors in terms of his age and tenure.

Obviously, in doing so, I am working off the assumption that President Nelson will become the next President of the Church. At times like these, the Church's doctrines and policies indicate that if the senior apostle consults with the Lord and feels impressed to do so, he could announce his feeling that someone junior to him should be appointed in his stead. But that has never once happened in any of the 15 (soon to be 16) transitions there have been in the Church presidency, so while it is possible, it is unlikely.

With that said, I am going to note the obvious here: that is, that President Nelson will be the Church president with the shortest tenure for the first 9 months or so he serves, and because of the varying tenure lengths of his predecessors, he will mark only one tenure milestone before the end of this year,

In terms of his age, his birth date makes him the 16th in chronological order, while his age will put him at the bottom of the five oldest Church presidents. And if he is still living roughly a week after the April 2022 General Conference, he will have already become the oldest prophet in the Church's history. About one year previous to that time, his tenure length will have reached the 13th longest such period in Church history.

It continually amazes me to consider how Church presidents come to these callings ready to do the Lord's will for as long as his service in that capacity is needed, and also how and when the Lord enables other apostles to move up in apostolic seniority, with some passing away before they become Church president, and others outliving those senior to them, whether they are older or younger than those who have gone before.

I hope this information was helpful to at least some of you. That does it for this post. Any and all comments are, as always, welcome and appreciated. Thank you for the privilege of your time. Until my next post, I wish each one of you all the best and pray that the Lord will bless you all in everything you do.

Friday, January 5, 2018

President Monson's Ministry By the Numbers

Hello again, everyone! This will just be a brief post to share how the Mormon Newsroom's website just released this article, which looks at President Monson's ministry by the numbers. It is interesting to see the last decade of Church progress and how that has related to other major achievements of our dear prophet. I hope many (if not all) of you will find that interesting as well. That does it for this post. Any and all comments are, as always, welcome and appreciated. Thank you for the privilege of your time. Until my next post, I wish each one of you all the best and pray that the Lord will bless you all in everything you do.

An Interesting Anomaly Regarding Upcoming Worldwide Devotional for Young Adults

Hello again, everyone! Yesterday or the day before (I'm honestly not sure which), I had posted a few thoughts about how assignments given or approved by a prophet who subsequently passes away prior to such events occurring are generally honored by his successor in the Church presidency. And it appears that is the case with the assignment given to the Uchtdorfs to speak during the Worldwide Devotional for Young Adults.

There is an interesting anomaly about that assignment, along with a unique invitation associated with it that I thought  was worth mentioning. In regards to the unique invitation, the Uchtdorfs have invited many young adults in Utah to be with them in the Conference Center as the devotional is held. But they have also announced that the devotional will include activities for their involvement, the encouragement to use social media during the course of that devotional, and refreshments and an informal get-together after the devotional.

Now that I have discussed the unique invitation, here is the anomaly: This Church News article uses the honorific title for President Dieter F. Uchtdorf, but this article from the Church's official website is virtually a verbatim copy of that article, with one exception: it refers to him as "Elder Uchtdorf".

In an earlier comment in which I offered my response to a question about the use of the honorific title, I mentioned that it is generally customary for counselors of a deceased Church president to retain the use of their honorific titles at least through the funeral services, if they do not go on to be retained in the First Presidency under the new Church president.

So I thought it was interesting that two almost identical sources about this devotional have different designations for President Monson's Second Counselor. With that said, that does it for this post. Any and all comments are, as always, welcome and appreciated. Thank you for the privilege of your time. Until my next post, I wish each one of you all  the best and pray that the Lord will bless you  all in everything you do.