Stokes Sounds Off

Search This Blog

Leaderboard

Saturday, September 1, 2018

A Couple of Updates Provided on Temples

Hello again, everyone! I wanted to post now to report two temple developments that have come to my attention within the last few hours. First, the unofficial site for information about temples (which can be found at its' new URL here shows that the new projected estimate within which the site might be finished with its' restoration work has changed to September 30 of this year.

If this estimate has changed to be more specific, hopefully that means all is going with with the restoration work. But hopefully it also means that this is the latest anticipated date whereby that site might again be up and running. As those of us who enjoy the site continue to pray for those involved in that restoration process, hopefully it can be completed sooner rather than later.

In the meantime, the Facebook page for the site has noted that unanticipated repairs will be done for the Rexburg Idaho Temple. As some of you may recall, the dedication for that temple had been set to occur on February 3, 2008, but the unexpected passing of President Gordon B. Hinckley one week earlier meant that the following Sunday would mark the reorganization of the First Presidency. Therefore, one major action President Monson took as President of the Quorum of the Twelve Apostles was to announce that the dedication would be delayed for a week.

Although the temple is just over 10 years old, it appears that the extreme heat on one end and the extreme cold on the other has resulted in somewhat significant damage to a few of the most prominent exterior elements of the temple. With a closure of that temple having gone into effect last Monday (August 27), the temple will be closed until Monday September 17, a period of three weeks. The reason that I did not mention that temple among those closing for an extended period at some point this year was that I felt a need to restrict that list to temples which would close for more than a month.

That said, though no other source is tracking this information, I continue to monitor the Church's progress towards having 200 operating temples by or before the 200th anniversary of the Church (which will, as previously noted, be marked on Saturday April 6, 2030). I have run the numbers that will be effective for tomorrow, at which time there will be 11.59 years remaining until said anniversary. The Church will easily have 200 operating temples at that time if roughly 3.54 temples are dedicated each year between now and then.

As also previously noted, the 2 temple dedications set to occur before the end of this year will be below that average, but next year, with 1 temple dedication already scheduled and 5 others anticipated to be announced within the next year or so, a total of 6 temples will make 2019 fall above that average. 3 other temples already anticipated to be dedicated during 2020 will put that year almost at that average by the time we get between June and August.

And if, as anticipated, we learn more in around a month in General Conference about the specific extent to which President Nelson's plans to expand the number of temples might go, then the number of temple events held during the remainder of 2020 and the years that follow could very well increase exponentially.

For that reason, I have no doubts whatsoever that the Church could easily construct and dedicate a minimum of 30 temples between mid-2020 and the date of that 200th anniversary, and I would not in any way be surprised if there are many more than that by that date. Whatever might occur in that regard, you can depend on my bringing word of it to you all here as I become aware of such developments.

That does it for this post. Any and all comments are, as always, welcome and appreciated. Thank you for the privilege of your time. If you enjoyed what you read here and would like to stay informed of newly-added content, please feel free to subscribe. Until my next post, I wish each one of you all the best and pray that the Lord will bless you all in everything you do.

Miscellaneous Interesting Tidbits Gleaned from Resources Recently Made Available

Hello again, everyone! Hope you all are well. I wanted to post right now with, as the title implies, various interesting tidbits gleaned from resources recently made available. Let's dive right into all of those details. First, as I mentioned in an earlier post, 3 of the 4 Church magazines published for September 2018 listed changes in magazine advisers, including that Elder Randall K. Bennett and Sister Becky Craven were now listed as advisers rather than assistant editors of the magazines. Those changes have now been additionally confirmed in the September 2018 Ensign, of which the PDF version was just recently made available.

Next, from Mormon Newsroom, we have 2 stories covering subjects which I have already mentioned in previous posts on this blog, but which are well worthy of reiteration, in addition to one new article. First, the articles covering subjects previously mentioned. Those relate to the ministry of our First Presidency members: namely, this article, shared from the Jamaica Mormon Newsroom and covering President Nelson's announced plans to visit the Caribbean Area of the Church this next weekend, and this one highlighting  President Oaks' remarks given to young married couples in several Californian stakes which covered several topics that some may consider somewhat controversial.

In the meantime, the new story from Mormon Newsroom to which I referred above is this article, which shares how Sister Reyna I. Aburto, Second Counselor in the Relief Society General Presidency, and Sister Lisa L. Harkness, First Counselor in the Primary General Presidency, are travelling in the Central America Area. Their trip, which began on August 24 and will end on September 4, is one of the longest (if not the very longest) international trips taken by auxiliary leaders. They spent a good amount of time visiting survivors of the recent volcanic eruption which occurred in Guatemala, and they will also visit Costa Rica, Panama, Honduras, and El Salvador.

Before moving on to stories from the Church News, I wanted to report here that, atypical to what we have seen previously, as of this last day of August, there has been no announcement as of yet in terms of the schedule for Church-wide events which will be held next year. Last year, most of the 2018 events (except for the temple events which were scheduled later) had been announced on August 25.

The fact that we are going into September with no announcement about the 2019 scheduled events seems significant, but I am assuming that the reason that announcement has been delayed is because President Nelson is visiting the Caribbean Area this weekend, and because the United States will observe Labor Day on Monday. But I will be looking out for that information and will pass it along to you all as i become aware of it.

Our focus now shits to the Church News, where two articles share some information about our junior apostle, Elder Ulisses Soares of the Quorum of the Twelve. As I previously reported, Elder Soares recently returned home to Brazil for the first time since his call to the apostleship. This article highlights more fully some of the connections he has with the people of that nation, and how they in turn responded to the news of his call, hearing him speak to them as a "special witness" of the Savior, and  witnessing him invoke an apostolic blessing upon them.

In the meantime, the other article which referenced Elder Soares' recent ministry efforts was the next installment in the Church News series "This Week on Social", which shares things about which various Church leaders have posted on social media websites. In addition to the comments from Elder Soares, other posts featured thoughts from his apostolic seatmate Elder Gerrit W. Gong, along with another post from Elder Neil L. Andersen (who shared a clip of the talk he gave during the April 2005 General Conference entitled "Beware of the Evil Behind the Smiling Eyes").

As a sidenote, that talk was given just four months before he began serving in the Presidency of the Seventy, in which Presidency he would continue to serve until his own call to the apostleship in April 2009). His warning is as apropos and relevant today as it was when it was given. And a post from Elder Quentin L. Cook highlighted the new narrative history of the Church entitled Saints, which, as noted above, will be discussed more fully in the final Face-to-Face event for Young Adults this year. And the final post from an apostle which was shared in that article was from Elder Dieter F. Uchtdorf, who shared some thoughts about repentance.

The final social media post shared in that article was the only one not featuring a member of the Quorum of the Twelve Apostles. That post was published by Sister Michelle D. Craig, the First Counselor in the Young Women General Presidency. And I was particularly intrigued by something she specifically said, namely: "I rediscovered a story in the Old Testament a few months ago while preparing for a talk." Now, while she could have been referring to an address she has given or will yet give during a meeting with Church members, the wording of that statement seems more indicative that she will be speaking in the next General Conference.

If that turns out to be the case, then it is more likely than not that she will be giving that "talk" in General Conference in October. As I previously noted, I have predicted she will be speaking during the Women's Session. Some may contend that, if she is referring to an address she has prepared/is preparing for General Conference, she may be speaking during one of the other four general sessions.. But there is a big reason why I think otherwise:

Although there may have been one or two exceptions in recent years (mainly relating to the Women's Session), it has usually been tradition for a new president of any of the Church's five auxiliaries to speak during a general session before either of the two counselors in that presidency do so. Since the Young Women General Presidency was just changed last conference, it can be assumed that Sister Bonnie H. Cordon, the new General President, will speak during any of the four general sessions. If that turns out to be the case, the only other possibility is that Sister Craig is the representative from the Young Women General Presidency who will be speaking during the Women's Session.

Around 9 hours ago, the Church News updated this article which first announced President Nelson's plans to visit the Caribbean Area this weekend. Meanwhile, this article shares a video which highlights experiences from members of the Church in Europe who recently participated in a challenge to read the entire Book of Mormon over a 21-day period.

And in two other stories highlighting remarkable lay members of the Church, the "survival stories" of members battling rare diseases are shared, along with this account detailing the 35-day trek Church members took through the Australian Alps to raise $10,000 for children living in indigenous regions of the world.

Finally tonight, the Church News continues to share stories highlighting ongoing developments related to "FamilySearch". This article details how those with a FamilySearch account can see whether they have any ancestors who lived in Nauvoo. All of these developments are most exciting. I enjoyed reading about them and hope you enjoyed my coverage of them in this post. I continue to monitor any Church news or temple developments and will do my level best to pass word of those along to you all as I become aware of them.

On a personal note, I just wanted to clarify something that may be misunderstood in the ongoing discussion of the most likely prospective locations that might have a temple announced next October. In case I was not specific on this point, the locations I shared a few days ago are those for which (in my opinion) a temple may be announced in General Conference in around a month.

While I am convinced that there are many locations not on my current list that are very worthy of having the honor of such an announcement in the near future, until the extent of President Nelson's plans to expand the number of temples is known (which may not be detailed more fully until next General Conference or the one after that), I felt a need to focus my personal list on those locations which (in my opinion) have the highest probability for an announcement during the upcoming General Conference.

Once President Nelson's plans are detailed more fully and we have more of an idea of the number of temples that might be announced in the future to best facilitate those plans, I am more than ready to expand my list to include any other location favored by others which seem for the moment to be more distant prospects. I apologize if that was not clear enough in what I have said previously.

With that in mind, any comments which any of you have on the latest version of that list (including if I have been overly optimistic in my consideration of any of those locations or if there are any I have missed which have a higher likelihood of being announced in October than I might currently believe) would be most welcome and appreciated, as would any or all comments on any other post I have done on this blog.

That does it for this post. Thank you for t he privilege of your time. If you enjoyed what you read here and would like to stay informed of newly added content, please feel free to subscribe. Until my next post, I wish each one of you all the best and pray that the Lord will bless you all in everything you do.

Friday, August 31, 2018

Two Apostles to Mark Their Birthdays in September

Hello again, everyone! While I have no desire to take focus away from the conversation about recently-covered topics in previous posts on this blog, at the same time, in view of the other subjects I will be covering within the next 10-14 days (including ongoing Church news and any temple developments), I wanted to take some time in the early-morning hours of the last day of August 2018 to provide some thoughts about the two apostolic birthdays which will be observed within the first 10 days of September.

The two apostles in question will actually be observing their birthdays a mere day apart. Elder Quentin L. Cook will be marking his 78th birthday on September 8. The very next day, our beloved prophet, President Russell M. Nelson, will observe his 94th birthday.

And it is interesting to consider that in the week before his birthday, President Nelson will be making the aforementioned trip to Puerto Rico. Also, as already noted, on President Nelson's 94th birthday, Elder Cook will be joined by two representatives from the Church History Department in holding a Face-to-Face event for Young Adults that will introduce the new 4-volume Church history series Saints and allow young adults to have questions answered by the three.

Additionally, looking ahead to things coming up later in September, the open house for the Concepcion Chile Temple will, as previously noted, begin on September 15 and will last until October 13 (excluding General Conference weekend and Sunday September 16, 23 and 30). It would appear that open house reservations were first made available on Tuesday July 10 and continue to be available through October 13.

As always, I continue to monitor all Church news and temple developments and will, to the best of my ability, provide coverage of it all as I receive word of it. That does it for this post. Any and all comments are, as always, welcome and appreciated. If you enjoyed what you read here and would like to stay informed of newly-added content, please feel free to subscribe. Until my next post, I wish each one of you all the best and pray that the Lord will bless you all in everything you do.

Wednesday, August 29, 2018

BREAKING NEWS: BYU-Provo Commencement/President Nelson To Visit Puerto Rico

Hello again, everyone! I have somewhat breaking news on two different fronts. First, BYU-Provo, with the approval of the Church Board of Education, has announced that it will no longer hold commencement exercises in the fall, but will instead hold one graduation ceremony each April, to which all who will complete their education during any given year will be invited. You can find more details on that here.

In the meantime, for the first time in a decade or more, the Caribbean Saints will welcome a prophet of the Lord to their islands. President Russell M. and Sister Wendy W. Nelson, accompanied by Elder Dale G. Renlund of the Quorum of the Twelve Apostles and his wife Ruth L. Renlund, are set to speak at a missionary meeting and member devotional which will originate from Santo Domingo in the Dominican Republic, which will be broadcast to other regions in the Caribbean on Saturday September 1.

The following day, the Nelsons and Renlunds will be in Puerto Rico, where they will all be speaking at a devotional for members that will be similarly broadcast to those who cannot attend in person. While this has not been verified, I would imagine that part of their time in the Caribbean will be spent visiting the site of the Port-au-Prince Haiti Temple.

The Puerto Rican members of the Church are still recovering from the aftermath of the hurricane that struck their island nation nearly a year ago. For that reason, while I would love to see the Church announce a temple for Puerto Rico during General Conference in around a month, that prospect may not be as imminent as it appears to be. It also appears that President Nelson did not want to delay assessing the situation firsthand there.  You can find the Church News report on this development here.

It is also interesting that the second leg of this trip will be observed one week prior to President Nelson's 94th birthday. And he continues the tradition of just stopping between trips long enough to get a new traveling companionship from the Quorum of the Twelve Apostles. If he continues to make trips to nearby areas roughly once a month, and more extended trips once or twice a year, it will not be long at all before he has visited a wide variety of Saints from various world regions.

I have not found official confirmation of this, but it would make sense to me if he is the one to travel to Chile in late October and Colombia in mid-December to dedicate the temples there. In the interim, I can see him continuing to travel as time and circumstances allow. It is indeed awe-inspiring to think that the second-oldest man to ever be ordained president of the Church is as vibrant and healthy (if not more so) than any Church President has been since the early days of President Hinckley's presidency.

While the length of his presidency is up to the Lord, it is amazing that, at his age, he is still making regular trips outside the United States. I am sure he will continue to do so as his time, circumstances, and health allow, and you can find all the latest information on those travels here as I become aware of it.

In the meantime, I wanted to additionally note that the Church has also reported on an area-wide Family Home Evening that was carried by Facebook Live to all Saints in Brazil while President M. Russell Ballard and Elder Ulisses Soares of the Quorum of the Twelve Apostles were visiting to conduct Church business there. This was the first time Elder Soares returned to his homeland since his call to the Quorum of the Twelve Apostles almost 5 months ago.

That does it for this post. Any and all comments are, as always, welcome and appreciated. Thank you for the privilege of your time. If you enjoyed what you read here and would like to stay informed of newly-added content, please feel free to subscribe. Until my next post, I wish each one of you all the best and pray that the Lord will bless you all in everything you do.

Tuesday, August 28, 2018

Updated List of Prospective Temple Locations for the October 2018 General Conference

Hello again, everyone! After taking some more time within the last couple of weeks to do additional research on future temple prospects, and as a result of ongoing comments from all of you, I have once again revised my list of locations that (in my opinion) are most likely to have a temple announced in October by President Russell M. Nelson. The updated list, complete with updated notes, follows below.

So as not to disturb the flow of that information, I will end here and now as I always do. That does it for this post. Any and all comments are, as always, welcome and appreciated. Thank you for the privilege of your time. If you enjoyed what you read here and would like to stay informed of newly-added content, please feel free to subscribe. Until my next post, I wish each one of you all the best and pray that the Lord will bless you all in everything you do.


Temple Predictions: 3+ temples announced, with the most likely locations (in my opinion), on the list below (grouped first by the geographical areas of the Church under which these locations fall, then by imminent likelihood within those areas.

Preliminary note: With seven temples having been announced last April (the second-highest number of temples ever announced at once), some have offered their opinion that perhaps no new temples may be announced during this General Conference. While I understand the rationale behind that opinion, there have been an increasing number of references to the fact that President Nelson’s plans to expand the number of temples worldwide will outpace and overshadow what we previously saw under President Hinckley’s inspired leadership. As I will detail more fully in the notes below, if that plan involves lowering the maximum distance within which Saints worldwide have to travel to reach their assigned temple (which has been around 200 miles), then that, combined with whatever his plans are to expand the number of temples may mean that nothing can be reasonably ruled out. For this go-round, I again solicited feedback from the readers of my blog. The selections which follow below represent what, to me, are the most likely prospects, sorted first by the area of the Church under which they fall, then by likelihood within that area, along with any pertinent information which was shared via the comments on my blog.

Africa Southeast[1]: Antananarivo Madagascar[2]; Maputo Mozambique[3]
Africa West[4]: Freetown Sierra Leone[5]; Kumasi Ghana[6]; Lagos Nigeria[7]; Monrovia Liberia[8]
Asia: Ulaanbaatar Mongolia[9]
Brazil[10]: Belo Horizonte[11]; Salvador[12]; Florianopolis[13]; Sao Paulo area (2nd temple)[14]
Caribbean: San Juan Puerto Rico[15]
Central America: Guatemala City (2nd temple)[16]
Europe[17]: Budapest Hungary[18]; Praia Cape Verde[19]; Edinburgh Scotland[20]; Vienna Austria[21]
Mexico[22]: Puebla Mexico[23]; Queretaro Mexico[24]
Pacific: Port Moresby Papua New Guinea[25]; Auckland New Zealand[26]; Tarawa Kiribati[27]; Pago Pago American Samoa[28]; Neiafu Vava'u Tonga[29]
Philippines[30]: Davao Philippines[31]
South America Northwest[32]: La Paz/Santa Cruz Bolivia[33]; Maracaibo Venezuela[34]
South America South[35]: Ciudad del Este Paraguay[36]

North America[37] (including the United States and Canada):
Idaho: Preston Idaho[38]
North America Central: Missoula Montana[39]; Rapid City South Dakota[40]; Wichita Kansas[41]; Green Bay Wisconsin[42]; Des Moines Iowa[43]; Pueblo Colorado[44]
North America Northeast: Augusta Maine[45]; Montpelier Vermont[46]
North America Northwest: Fairbanks Alaska[47]
North America Southeast: Jackson Mississippi[48]; Shreveport Louisiana[49]; Jacksonville Florida[50]; Knoxville Tennessee[51]
North America Southwest: Bentonville Arkansas[52]; Elko[53]/Ely[54] Nevada; Fort Worth Texas[55]; Las Cruces New Mexico[56]; Flagstaff Arizona[57]
North America West: Bakersfield California[58]
Utah Salt Lake City: Herriman[59];
Utah South: Heber City[60]; Tooele[61]



[1]The Church has experienced substantial growth throughout the African continent, and that applies to this area of the Church as well. Right now, the only currently-operating temple is in Johannesburg South Africa. There are 2 additional temples under construction (in Kinshasa DR Congo and Durban South Africa, both of which will be dedicated next year) and 2 others announced (in Harare Zimbabwe and Nairobi Kenya, both of which may have a groundbreaking within the next 2-3 years or less). If the growth in this area continues as it has, then several other temples may be needed, with the most likely prospects (in my opinion) and the reasoning behind each location following in the next several notes.
[2]Madagascar is currently the last of the top ten nations with the strongest Church presence that does not have a temple in any phase. Madagascar is separated by a body of water from the rest of the African continent, which means that anywhere else an African temple is now or will be built is difficult for the Madagascar Saints to get to. Currently, the Saints in Madagascar have a journey of 1,338 miles from the Johannesburg South Africa Temple. Once the Harare Zimbabwe Temple is built and dedicated, that distance will be cut to 1,082 miles. Between the great distance and the difficulty of travel, Madagascar is surely a top contender for a temple of its’ own.
[3]Right now, the Saints in Mozambique currently travel 341.5 miles to worship at the Johannesburg South Africa Temple. No other temple under construction or announced will be any closer than that. Mozambique already qualifies for a temple based on the 200-mile goal previously referenced. So if that goal is lowered at all, the imminence of such a prospect may be just a matter of time.
[4]The Church in the Africa West Area has also experienced massive and rapid growth. The LDS Church Growth Blog recently reported that, if current growth trends in the Africa West Area continue as they have been lately, the Church could go from the 2 operating and 1 announced temple to 13 in operation by sometime during 2030. With that in mind, several temples may dot this area in the near future, and the locations in this section seem to me to be the most imminently likely prospects. 
[5]Sierra Leone is now the fourth of the top ten nations that have the strongest Church presence but do not yet have a temple in any phase. With the recent expanded growth in Sierra Leone (particularly with so many districts that have been upgraded to stakes), a temple there may simply be a matter of time. The Saints in Freetown currently journey 1,243.2 miles to the Accra Ghana temple, a distance which will not be cut until the temple in Abidjan Ivory Coast is built and dedicated, at which point the Freetown Saints will be 911 miles away. Since that is still far greater than the 200-mile distance, whether or not that mileage goal is lowered, Sierra Leone is very likely to get a temple soon.
[6]Since the dedication of the Accra Ghana temple in January 2004, Ghana has seen sufficient enough growth (in my opinion) to potentially get a second temple. And Kumasi has emerged as the most likely city for such a temple. Although the Saints in Kumasi currently only have to travel 154.4 miles to the Accra temple, if the minimum mileage is lowered, then a temple in Kumasi may just be a matter of time.
[7]Nigeria has likewise seen extensive growth since the Aba temple was dedicated in August 2005. While many have offered their opinions that Benin City would be the better prospect for Nigeria’s second temple, the elements I have studied leads me to conclude that Lagos, which is 291 miles away from Aba, is the more imminent prospect. That said, I would fully anticipate that there will be temples in both Lagos and Benin City at some point within the next 10-15 years or less.
[8]In the afore-mentioned list on the LDS Church Growth Blog (which covered the 10 nations with the strongest LDS presence that do not have a temple in any phase), Liberia comes in at #9. The Saints in Liberia travel 946.5 miles to worship in the Accra Ghana Temple. Once the Abidjan Ivory Coast Temple is built and dedicated, that distance will decrease to 616.5 miles. If, as observed in note 12 above, a temple is built in Freetown, that distance gets almost cut in half to 338.8 miles, which is still well above the current mileage goal. So if the minimum distance is lowered at all, Liberia may be a prime candidate for a temple in the near future.
[9]Mongolia was one nation I had on my list of more distant prospects, primarily because the Church presence in that nation is not as strong as it seems to be in other Asian nations. The main argument in favor of a temple being built in Mongolia seems to be the mileage metric. The Saints in Mongolia currently travel 1,805 miles to the Hong Kong China Temple. And my study shows that no other operating or announced temple will cut that distance at all. With that in mind, a temple in Ulaanbaatar seems to be just a matter of time.
[10]The nation of Brazil has seen strong Church growth, perhaps the greatest amount Church-wide outside of North America. With 6 temples in operation there currently, there are two others under construction in Fortaleza (where a dedication is anticipated early next year) and Rio de Janeiro (which is anticipated to be dedicated in early 2020). There are two others which have been announced in Belem and Brasilia. With these four in different phases, it is difficult to know how soon other temples might be announced for the nation. But the following locations, for the reasons I will highlight below, have a strong case in favor of a temple.
[11]Up until recently, I had had both Belo Horizonte and Salvador on my list for the immediate future, but had prioritized them in the reverse order. But the Church News reported on June 14 of this year that Elder Cook, during a visit to Brazil, had spent some time in Belo Horizonte. We have seen instances recently where members of the First Presidency or Quorum of the Twelve will visit areas that have recently had a temple announced, or where the Church is considering building a temple. Based on Elder Cook’s visit to Belo Horizonte, I have prioritized that city for now. If I see anything that would convince me to change the order of the two again, I will do so. 
[12]See note above on Belo Horizonte. Although Elder Cook’s more recent visit to Belo Horizonte did lead me to prioritize that city above Salvador, further digging on my part led me to another Church News report (dated March 22, 2018) which highlighted an apostolic visit by Elder Bednar to Recife, Sao Paulo, Salvador, and Brasilia.  Two apostolic visits to the same nation within a 3-month period is significant. Although there are temples in the first two cities where Elder Bednar visited (and another temple has been announced for Brasilia), there is no temple currently announced in Salvador. With that in mind, a temple could be announced there shortly as well. What will be interesting to see is whether either will be announced first, or both will be announced simultaneously, or if one could be announced while the other is in its’ construction phase.
[13]While I had seen Florianopolis as a feasible temple prospect at some point in the future, it was not until I took the reports of President Nelson’s ambitious temple-building plans into account that I felt comfortable including Florianopolis on this list for the immediate future. Right now, the nearest temples to the Saints in Florianopolis are the temple in Curitiba (which is 191.3 miles away) and Porto Alegre (which is exactly 285 miles away). Because the distances involved constitute undue hardship for the Saints in Florianopolis, a temple there may just be a matter of time. That said, it may be some time before we know how soon a temple might be announced there, if the temples in Salvador and Belo Horizonte are more imminently needed. For now though, I am confident enough to put it on this list.
[14]Up until 2016, the Church had not been known to put a second temple in any city outside the US. In 2016 and 2017, second temples were announced for Lima Peru (which will be named for and built in the Los Olivos region), and Manila Philippines (in the area of Muntinlupa City, which has yet to receive an official name). Since Sao Paulo is a strong area in terms of Church membership, a second temple there may be needed sooner rather than later, though that prospect could potentially be delayed until temples rise in Belo Horizonte, Salvador, and Florianopolis. But if the initial word on President Nelson’s temple building plans are any indication, then a second Sao Paulo temple, along with the other three locations, may be announced much sooner than anticipated
[15]Puerto Rico now ranks as the second of the top ten nations with the strongest Church presence that do not have a temple in any phase. With the construction of the Port-au-Prince Haiti Temple underway (which will be a very small temple) it makes sense that the Church might opt to announce a temple for San Juan in the near future, as the Puerto Rican Saints currently travel 251 miles to the Santo Domingo Dominican Republic, which is just about the current minimum mileage goal, but if that is lowered at all, the prospect certainly will become more imminent. The one unknown is whether or not the recent natural disasters that have struck Puerto Rico will impact how soon a temple is built there.
[16]As noted above, someone who is familiar with the situation of the Church in Guatemala mentioned that a temple in Senahu may be delayed until the presence of the Church increases there. In the meantime, that same individual noted that a second temple to split the current Guatemala City Guatemala Temple district may be a more likely prospect. At this point, given the reasons I outlined in the note above, Senahu remains on my list. I have also included the prospect of a second temple for Guatemala City, but could see the merits of removing either of the two as more information comes to light.
[17]Europe, particularly in the eastern countries of its’ continent, has seen some stagnation in terms of the growth of the Church. With temples currently under construction in Rome Italy and Lisbon Portugal (both of which will be dedicated next year), and another announced for a major yet-to-be determined city in Russia, the Church may opt to wait to construct other temples on the European continent until those 3 are either dedicated or at least further along in the process. That said, on the off-chance the Church does not so opt, the cities in this section, for the reasons I will explain in the subsequent notes that will follow this one, have the greatest chance of being announced in the near future.
[18]When I began sharing my thoughts on potential future temple locations, someone who has knowledge of the growth of the Church in Europe indicated that Budapest would likely be the next European city to get a temple. My study on the matter confirms that opinion, so it has been on my list for a while. Right now, the Saints in Budapest travel 418 miles to worship at the Freiberg Germany Temple. And neither of the two European temples under construction will be closer than that, so a temple in Budapest seems likely.
[19]Although Cape Verde is technically closer to the Africa North Area of the Church, it falls within the boundaries of the Europe Area. The nation, which now ranks as the eighth of the top ten nations with the strongest Church presence that does not have a temple, will likely have a temple announced in its’ capital city of Praia in the near future. This is because the Saints in Cape Verde currently travel 2,126 miles to worship at the Madrid Spain Temple. Although that distance will be slightly cut to 1,861 miles once the Lisbon Portugal Temple is dedicated, that is over 9 times further away than the mileage goal set by other prophets, and if that goal is lowered at all, a Praia temple may simply be a matter of time.
[20]When expanding my list of temple prospects, I knew I had to look at another temple in the UK. I had a temple for Scotland or Ireland on my list for the distant future, but after numerous comments on my blog and some additional research on my part, I determined that Scotland would be the more likely location for the next temple in the UK. The Saints in Edinburgh are 184.5 miles from their assigned temple in Preston England. If President Nelson’s temple-building plans involve lowering the minimum mileage from which any Saint should be from their assigned temple, then Edinburgh would indeed qualify for a temple, which would likely also serve Ireland, in addition to some parts of England that are nearest to the two countries.
[21]Although the Saints in Austria have seen a slight consolidation in the number of Church units in that nation recently, their currently assigned temple in Frankfurt (which is closed for renovation) is 444.3 miles away. If a temple is built in Budapest Hungary, the Austria Saints may be reassigned to that temple, which would then be 151 miles away. But I would anticipate that a temple could be announced for Vienna within the next few years, if not immediately, as long as all goes well.
[22]The growth of the Church in Mexico has somewhat stagnated to the point where Church leaders began last year to do a mass consolidation of the Church units there, primarily for the purpose of strengthening the remaining units. With that in mind, it may be difficult to gauge how soon other Mexican temples might be needed. But for the locations in this section represent the most likely prospects I see for the near future. 
[23]One of the readers of my blog (who lives in Mexico) shared feedback reiterating the idea that the next temple in Mexico will likely be in Puebla, and that such a temple will likely be announced sooner rather than later. This makes sense, because even though Puebla is only 81.3 miles from the Mexico City temple, it may be the foremost prospects to split the current district. The only question might be whether or not that prospect is as imminent as it appears to be, since there is reportedly an attendance problem in the Mexico City temple. If it has not been kept busy enough, that prospect could potentially be delayed for a little while. That said, I am confident enough to list it here for now, but will be watching for anything that changes my mind.
[24]The Saints in Queretaro Mexico currently travel 135.8 miles to worship at the Mexico City Mexico Temple, and would actually be further away than that from a temple in Puebla, unless the journey to Puebla would be less of a hardship to those Saints than the journey to Mexico City. Again, the timing of the announcement(s) for the next temple(s) will depend largely on whether or not a temple elsewhere would make sense, given the apparent lack of sufficient activity within the Mexico City temple. Until more is known about that, and about President Nelson’s plans to expand the number of temples, I feel confident in keeping both cities on my list.
[25]Papua New Guinea now ranks as the nation with the strongest Church presence that does not yet have a temple. I also learned several years ago that land has been held in reserve in Port Moresby for a temple for a while now. With that in mind, it may simply be a matter of time before a temple is announced there.
[26]As with Papua New Guinea, I had heard years ago that land has been held in reserve in Auckland for a temple. The Church has since announced and begun a renovation for the only temple in that nation (which is located in Hamilton). Although the Auckland Saints are merely 77.6 miles away from the Hamilton temple, if President Nelson’s plans to expand the number of temples involves halving or quartering the 200 mile maximum distance set by other Church presidents, Auckland would certainly qualify for a temple by that metric as well.
[27]Kiribati currently ranks as the third nation with the strongest LDS presence that does not have a temple in any phase of construction. The Saints in Tarawa currently travel 1,402 miles to worship at the Suva Fiji Temple, and no other currently-operating temple is closer than that. With all of this in mind, a temple in that nation may simply be a matter of time.
[28]American Samoa ranks fifth on the list of nations with the strongest Church presence that do not have a temple in any phase. The nearest temple to the Saints in the capital city of Pago Pago is currently Apia Samoa, and the Pago Pago Saints currently travel 76.2 miles, which is not long distance-wise, but involves journeying over a body of water, which may be inconvenient. Also, if the minimum mileage goal set by previous Church presidents is halved or quartered, that will no doubt make this prospect more imminent.
[29]Tonga has recently seen impressive Church growth, which leads me to believe that a second temple may be needed to serve the Saints there. The city of Neiafu Vava’u seems to be the most likely location for a second Tongan temple, since the Saints in that city currently travel 189 miles to the temple in Nuku’alofa. Although that is within the current minimum mileage, if that minimum is halved or quartered, then that, combined with the extensive growth in Tonga, leads me to believe that a Neiafu Vava’u temple will be announced sooner rather than later.
[30]With two currently-operating temples in Manila and Cebu, and three others announced for Urdaneta, Muntinlupa City (which is the second for the Manila area) and Cagayan de Oro, the Church could opt to wait to announce any other temples for the Philippines until those 3 are further along. But I do see the imminent prospect for one additional temple in this nation, for reasons I will explain in the note below.
[31]Davao is currently assigned to the Cebu City Temple District, from which it is 335.7 miles. That distance will not decrease at all until the Cagayan de Oro Philippines Temple, which was announced last April, is built and dedicated. But even then, the Saints in Davao will still have a journey of 161.8 miles. If the minimum distance set by previous Church presidents is halved or quartered, then Davao will surely be the next city in the Philippines to get a temple. I have had this city on lists like this for a long time, so I hope a temple will be announced there sooner rather than later.
[32]The entire South American continent has experienced massive Church growth. Having previously discussed Brazil, I will focus my comments about South America on the two other areas of the Church within this continent. Starting with the South America Northwest Area, I wanted to observe that there are 6 operating temples there. 1 other (in Barranquilla Colombia) is set to be dedicated in December of this year. 1 more is currently under construction in Arequipa Peru (for which a dedication is anticipated in early 2020). Two others have been announced (the Lima Peru Los Olivos Temple, which may have a groundbreaking within the next year, if not sooner, and the Quito Ecuador Temple, which could have a groundbreaking within the next 2-3 years, though hopefully sooner if all goes well). With the South America Northwest Area having experienced somewhat rapid growth, I have long been of the opinion that several prospects were likely possibilities for this area in the near future, and I expanded the number of those prospective locations again with the increased comments about President Nelson’s ambitious temple-building plans. For the reasons mentioned in the notes below, each of the locations on this list have a strong case in their favor as prospects for the near future.
[33]Since the dedication of Bolivia’s first temple in Cochabamba, the Church in Bolivia has seen significant growth and expansion. That has been especially true of regions that would be served by temples in Santa Cruz or La Paz. Of the two, although I favor La Paz,, my research indicates a Santa Cruz temple may be more imminent. But I fully anticipate temples in both cities within the next 15 years or less, thus both are on this list for now.
[34]The temple in Caracas was announced during the October 1995 General Conference, with a groundbreaking occurring in January 1999, and a dedication for it was held the following year in August. One year prior to the dedication of the temple in Caracas, President Hinckley publicly proposed another Venezuelan temple for the city of Maracaibo, which is 432.5 miles from Caracas. Although Venezuela has political turbulence at the moment, and although there has been some Church unit consolidation there in recent years, when we combine the distance factor with the fact that temples publicly proposed during the administrations of Presidents Hinckley and Monson have gone on to be announced during the subsequent administrations of Presidents Monson and Nelson, the case in favor of a temple in Maracaibo is strong, so that prospect may be more imminent than many (myself included) might anticipate.
[35]As noted above relating to the South America Northwest Area, the South America South Area has likewise seen extensive and significant growth. So again, with President Nelson’s extensive temple-building plans in mind, I have considered the most imminent prospects for future temples in this area, which, for the reasons outlined in the notes below, have a strong case in their favor.
[36]In view of the need to expand my list of prospects for this area, Ciudad del Este seems to be the most likely prospect for a second temple in Paraguay, with the only question being how imminently likely that might be. When the renovation process is complete for the Asuncion temple, the Saints in Ciudad del Este will have a journey of 201.4 miles to worship there, which is already above the minimum goal other prophets have set. If that minimum distance is lowered at all, then a temple in that city may simply be a matter of time.  
[37]Although the North American continent (primarily in the United States) has seen somewhat of a stagnating growth situation, in light of the recent increased mentions of President Nelson’s ambitious temple-building plans, the likelihood is extremely high that the US and Canada will be included in whatever the plans are to expand the number of temples worldwide. The locations listed below represent what I believe are the most imminent prospects for the US and Canada in the near future.
[38]Preston Idaho is a relatively new addition to this list. Although the Church has not yet begun full-scale construction on the temple in Pocatello (which was announced in April 2017), since Idaho is part of the Mormon corridor, that opens the prospect that both temples could be under construction at around the same time. The main reason I added a temple for Preston this go-round is because it would split the current Logan Utah Temple district. Right now, the Saints in Preston travel 26.7 miles to worship at that temple. Although that may not be an inordinate distance, at the same time, if the Logan temple is as busy as the reports I have found seem to indicate, splitting the district would make a lot of sense, and Preston seems to be the most effective location to accomplish that. 
[39]According to reports I received through the comments on my blog, Elder David A. Bednar publicly proposed a Missoula Montana Temple while on assignment to a stake conference in that city. My subsequent research indicates that land has been held in reserve for such a temple for several years n. ow, and that an official announcement will occur once the right conditions are met. For that reason, Missoula has been on my list for a while now, and I could see an official announcement in the near future.
[40]Although South Dakota only has 2 stakes and 1 district, and although the districts of the Bismarck North Dakota and Winter Quarters Nebraska Temples,, which cover South Dakota, may not be inordinately large, the Saints in Rapid City travel almost 300 miles to worship at the Bismarck temple, so it seems likely that the Church will opt to build a temple there sooner rather than later.
[41]Since Wichita Kansas was on one of my other two lists, I simply moved it up to this one as a more imminent prospect. The 7 stakes in Kansas currently are split between the Kansas City Missouri Temple, the Oklahoma City Oklahoma Temple, and the Denver Colorado Temple, and almost all of those 7 have extensive distances involved. So if the 200-mile goal set by previous Church presidents is lowered to any degree, all of the distances may well be considered inordinate. For these reason, a temple in Wichita seems likely to be announced sooner rather than later
[42]When I was first considering the most likely location for Wisconsin’s first temple, I had prioritized Madison (the nation’s capital) or Milwaukee. But after a lot of feedback and more research on my part, I determined Green Bay would be a more preferable location. There are six stakes in Wisconsin, all of which are assigned to the Chicago Illinois Temple District except one, which is assigned to the St. Paul Minnesota Temple district. Each of these stakes involves a journey between 90-200 miles to their assigned temple. So if the minimum distance set by previous Church presidents is shortened at all, Wisconsin is a prime candidate for a temple. And a temple in Green Bay would greatly shorten the trip for most (if not all) of the stakes in Wisconsin.
[43] Although the Church has previously built temples in sites which have historical significance, and although Council Bluffs in Iowa is one such location, given that the Saints who live in that area are less than 15 miles away from the temple in Winter Quarters Nebraska, a temple in Iowa is more likely to rise in the capital city of Des Moines. The 8 stakes in Iowa are currently divided between the Winter Quarters Nebraska and Nauvoo Illinois Temples. Of those 8 stakes, only the Saints in Council Bluffs are within 15 miles of their assigned temple. All other established stakes in this state are between 90-180 miles away from their assigned temple. With all of this in mind, Iowa would qualify for a temple, and if one rises in Des Moines, it would not surprise me at all if that temple was named for Mount Pisgah, which is another historically-significant site from early Church history, and for which the second Des Moines stake is named.
[44]A comment on my blog mentioned that the Saints in Pueblo and nearby Colorado Springs typically deal with massive and significant traffic congestion to get to their currently-assigned temple in Denver, which seems to be a very undue hardship. Since that also involves a one-way journey of 115.8 miles, I can see why a temple in Pueblo in the near future may be very likely.
[45]In view of all we have heard about President Nelson’s plans to expand the number of temples, Maine seems to be a prime candidate for such a temple. Although there are only two stakes in that state, the two are between 160 and 240 miles away from their currently-assigned temple in Boston. Whether or not the minimum mileage is lowered, Augusta surely qualifies for a temple of its’ own.
[46]Vermont is the 5th smallest of the 50 states, and has a Church presence that matches its’ size. Members in Montpelier currently travel 180.4 miles one way to worship at the Boston Massachusetts Temple. While New Hampshire may have a stronger Church presence currently than Vermont does, Vermont has a connection to Church history (as the Prophet Joseph Smith was born in Sharon), so it seems likely the Church would favor Vermont for a temple. The temple could potentially be built directly in Sharon (as the Church has a tradition of putting a temple in historically-significant locations), but my current research on the subject leads me to conclude that, unless a stake is established in Sharon before this temple is announced, Montpelier may be a preferable location, as it would provide such a temple with sufficient support from a nearby stake.
[47]The Saints residing in Fairbanks Alaska currently travel 360.3 miles to worship at the temple in Anchorage. Although the Saints in Juneau do have a longer journey to both Anchorage and Fairbanks, the latter has emerged from my study as the best prospect for Alaska’s second temple. That said, I can see a day when Juneau gets one as well, which may happen sooner than expected, depending on the extent of President Nelson’s temple-building plans.
[48]Mississippi is another state that does not yet have a temple in any phase. The Saints in Jackson currently travel 174.6 miles one way to worship at the Baton Rouge Louisiana Temple, but with that temple closed for renovation, the trip is much longer to get to the next nearest temple. That presents a compelling argument for the idea that a temple in Jackson may simply be a matter of time.
[49]The Saints in Shreveport currently travel 187.9 miles to their assigned temple in Dallas, so that city would qualify for a temple of its’ own if the current 200-mile distance goal set by previous church presidents is halved or quartered. Therefore, a temple in Shreveport may simply be a matter of time.
[50]With temples operating in Orlando and Fort Lauderdale, a third temple may be needed sooner rather than later. Several people have shared their feeling that Tallahassee may be a more likely location for the third temple in that state, but between my personal research on the subject and the opinions of others who seem to know more about Florida than I do, Jacksonville has made my list. That said, I can see a day within the next 5-10 years or less when both cities will have a temple. The Jacksonville Saints currently travel 140.7 miles to the temple in Orlando, so if the 200-mile distance is halved or quartered, then this prospect may be a very high priority in the near future.
[51]The Saints in Knoxville Tennessee currently travel 180.1 miles to worship at the temple in Nashville. That may also be an inordinate distance if the minimum mileage is lowered at all, and if we also take into account the fact that a journey to Nashville may be arduous, then a temple in Knoxville seems imminent.
[52]A good friend with connections to Arkansas told me a while ago that the Church has held land in reserve for a temple in Bentonville for a while now, and that an official announcement was likely once the right conditions were met. For that reason, I believe we will see this temple announced sooner rather than later. Some have opined that Rogers might be a more likely location for the first temple in Arkansas, but my study confirms that a temple is likely in Bentonville sooner rather than later. And as observed by someone on my blog, when the first temple in Arkansas is built, it could potentially be named for the Ozark Mountain range, which is a major landmark in Arkansas
[53]The Saints in Elko currently travel 229.6 miles to their assigned temple (Salt Lake). So Elko already qualifies in terms of the within 200-mile distance. And if that mileage goal is lowered, that prospect becomes more imminently likely.
[54]The note above applies to the Saints in Ely as well, as they commute 201.1 miles to their assigned temple in Cedar City. A temple in Ely would cut the commute substantially. And I fully believe that temples in both Elko and Ely are possible in the near future, since the distance between the two is just under 200 miles.
[55]In sharing my thoughts about potential future temple locations, I learned from someone living in Texas that Fort Worth would likely be the best prospective city to split the current Dallas district. In addition, although some have offered their feedback that El Paso may be a more likely location for that honor, and although I fully believe both cities will have temples of their own at some future point, I have prioritized Fort Worth for this list.
[56]The Saints in Las Cruces currently travel 224.6 miles to the temple in Albuquerque, so a temple there may just be a matter of time. A temple in that city could also likely serve the Saints in El Paso Texas, as the two cities are 46.2 miles apart. The journey between the two cities would be a fairly easy distance if for any reason the El Paso Saints are unable to get to their currently-assigned temple in Ciudad Juarez Mexico.
[57]Although Elder Larry Y. Wilson, the Executive Director of the Church’s Temple Department, stated at last year’s dedication of the Tucson Arizona Temple that Arizona was, for the moment, well-stocked with temples. That said, my study indicates that the next Arizona temple will be built in Flagstaff. Right now, the Saints in that city currently travel 119 miles to worship at the Snowflake Arizona Temple. If the 200-mile distance is decreased by President Nelson (either by halving or quartering it), then Snowflake would be a prime candidate for a temple, and that may even help to split some of the other temple districts in Arizona as well.
[58]Bakersfield California is roughly halfway between Fresno (from which it is 109.1 miles away) and Los Angeles (from which it is 113.3 miles away). Although there have been some congregational consolidations in California in recent years, the distances involved may be sufficient to warrant a temple in Bakersfield in the not-too-distant future.
[59]In 2005, President Gordon B. Hinckley noted that land was being held in reserve for a temple in the Southwestern Salt Lake Valley, which would have an official announcement when that became necessary. Subsequent study on my part in late 2017 and early 2018 pointed me to the conclusion that the land in question was in Bluffdale, but that it has since been annexed into the city of Herriman, although it has been the subject of more than a few border disputes. I am confident enough to list it here, and since President Monson announced temples publicly proposed during President Hinckley’s tenure, I feel that President Nelson may likely do the same. Thus, a temple there may just be a matter of time.
[60]A temple in Heber City (the prospect of which has been suggested a few times) would help provide a closer option for Saints in the Heber Valley, and it would likely split the district of the Provo Utah Temple, which, by all reports, is still one of the busiest in the Church.
[61]Tooele has also been mentioned repeatedly as a potential prospective city for a temple. While the Saints in Tooele do not have to drive an inordinate distance to reach their assigned temple in Salt Lake City, I feel a temple there may simply be a matter of time. And since a temple in Herriman would still create a drive (along a U-shape) for those Saints, it seems safe to assume that Tooele could (and likely will) get a temple soon.