Stokes Sounds Off: Update on Newly Created Church Units

Search This Blog

Leaderboard

Thursday, August 3, 2017

Update on Newly Created Church Units

Hello, all! Over the last two days, I have been impressed by the reported number of unit changes. In addition to those stakes or districts that were created during the annual July recess of the General Authorities (which is somewhat abnormal), numerous wards and branches have also been created. For those updates, click here (which is the LDS Church Temples page devoted to such changes). And you can depend on thorough analysis of such developments to be featured here (on the LDS Church Growth Blog). I am extremely sensitive about the matter of infringing on other people's territory, and those two sources are lovingly maintained by people I respect who are experts on those things. I will not take that prestige away from them. At a later time, once I am able to crunch the numbers, I will offer projections about the potential number of Church units by the end of this year, which is within my prerogative to do. For now, thank you for the privilege of your time, and may the Lord bless each and every one of you. I will be back soon. Until that time, all the best.

No comments:

Post a Comment

In addition to my life-long love for the subjects which I cover in the posts of this blog, I have long held the belief that we can disagree without becoming disagreeable. Differences of opinion are natural, while being disagreeable in expressing those differences is not. And in that sense, I have no desire to close the door on anyone who earnestly desires to contribute to the ongoing dialogue on subjects covered in the posts on this blog.

At the same time, however, I recognize that we live in a time when incivility, discourtesy, unkindness, and even cyber-bullying has regrettably become part of online interactions. With that in mind, while anyone who wishes can comment on anything if they choose to do so, I hereby reserve the right to immediately delete any comments which are critical, unkind, lack civility, or promote prodcuts, services, and values contrary to either the Church, or to the rules of online etiquette.

I'd also like to remind all who comment here that I try to respond personally to each individual comment as I feel is appropriate. Such replies are not meant to end the conversation, but to acknowledge earnest feedback as it is submitted.

And in order to better preserve the spirit and pure intentions for which this blog was established, I also hereby request that anyone not commenting with a regular user name (particularly those whose comments appear under the "Unknown" or "Anonymous" monikers, give the rest of us a name to work with in addressing any replies. If such individuals do not wish to disclose their actual given names, a pseudonym or nickname would suffice.

Any comments made by individuals who opt to not give a name by which they can ber identified may, depending on the substance and tone of such comments, be subject to deletion as well. I would respectfully ask that all of us do all we can to keep the dialogue positive, polite, and without malice or ill-will. May the Lord bless us all in our discussion of these important matters.