Hello, all! In my first reading of the Church News today, I came upon two interesting articles. Elder H. Bryan Richards, an emeritus general authority, gave the opening keynote address at the BYU Conference on Family History and Genealogy. He shared a wonderful experience about a journey of discovery he took to find information about his family. That news article can be found here.
Second, the Church News also wrote an article about a statement Elder Jeffrey R. Holland made as a follow-up to his address at the Seminar for New Mission Presidents. At the time he shared the story he told during that seminar, he was unaware of some elements of the story that had been embellished by family members. The family reached out to him with the true story, and he wanted to pass that along. I applaud Elder Holland's willingness to issue that clarification. Either version of the story is amazing. To read more about what Elder Holland said about this, click here.
That's it for this Church News update. Thanks for the privilege of your time. Comments are always welcome and appreciated, but I wanted to note that any negative comments about Elder Holland that may arise because of this update will not be tolerated. I have always been and will always be a staunch supporter of the Brethren, and, as amazing as we think they are, they are, like us, imperfect people who are trying to do the best they can to lead and inspire in spite of the weaknesses they may perceive in themselves. Elder Holland did a wonderful job of clarifying the true facts, and that's enough for me. He is still my favorite apostle, and this clarification only served to deepen my respect for him.
I will leave it at that. I will be back again soon with another update. Thanks again for your time. Hope you all are well.
On this blog, I, James Stokes, share insights and analysis covering the latest news and developments reported about The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints. My specific emphasis and focus is on the ministry of our current apostles, General Conference, and up-to-date temple information. This site is neither officially owned, operated, or endorsed by the Church, and I, as the autthor thereof, am solely responsible for this content.
Search This Blog
Wednesday, August 2, 2017
Church News Update
I have had a lifelong love for Church history, which has extended to ongoing reports of the ministry of our apostles and prophets, General Conference, and all temple developments. This blog enables me to share that love with all who read my thoughts on these developments, which are sometimes reported multiple times per day as needed.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment
In addition to my life-long love for the subjects which I cover in the posts of this blog, I have long held the belief that we can disagree without becoming disagreeable. Differences of opinion are natural, while being disagreeable in expressing those differences is not. And in that sense, I have no desire to close the door on anyone who earnestly desires to contribute to the ongoing dialogue on subjects covered in the posts on this blog.
At the same time, however, I recognize that we live in a time when incivility, discourtesy, unkindness, and even cyber-bullying has regrettably become part of online interactions. With that in mind, while anyone who wishes can comment on anything if they choose to do so, I hereby reserve the right to immediately delete any comments which are critical, unkind, lack civility, or promote prodcuts, services, and values contrary to either the Church, or to the rules of online etiquette.
I'd also like to remind all who comment here that I try to respond personally to each individual comment as I feel is appropriate. Such replies are not meant to end the conversation, but to acknowledge earnest feedback as it is submitted.
And in order to better preserve the spirit and pure intentions for which this blog was established, I also hereby request that anyone not commenting with a regular user name (particularly those whose comments appear under the "Unknown" or "Anonymous" monikers, give the rest of us a name to work with in addressing any replies. If such individuals do not wish to disclose their actual given names, a pseudonym or nickname would suffice.
Any comments made by individuals who opt to not give a name by which they can ber identified may, depending on the substance and tone of such comments, be subject to deletion as well. I would respectfully ask that all of us do all we can to keep the dialogue positive, polite, and without malice or ill-will. May the Lord bless us all in our discussion of these important matters.