Stokes Sounds Off: Whittling down the list of cities that might get a temple soon for my October General Conference Predictions

Search This Blog

Leaderboard

Monday, July 18, 2016

Whittling down the list of cities that might get a temple soon for my October General Conference Predictions

Hello, all! I am trying to whittle down the list of cities that may get a temple soon. I am asking for your help because I want to fine-tune my predictions. I will post a new copy of that list. I am looking to whittle it down to perhaps the 15 most likely locations. Let the process of elimination begin!  Any feedback would be appreciated. Here's the list as it now stands, followed by some comments.
1. Managua Nicaragua Temple (proposed in 2012 by Elder Russell M. Nelson; note that Nicaragua is the nation with the strongest LDS presence that doesn't have a temple in any phase; note also that Rick Satterfield, webmaster of the most excellent LDS Church Temples site, has informed me that a temple site has been purchased in this city for when membership warrants it )
2. Papua New Guinea (Port Moresby; note that Papua New Guinea is the nation with the second strongest LDS presence that doesn't have a temple in any phase; note that this is another location for which Brother Satterfield said a potential temple site has been purchased when membership warrants it. )
3. Puerto Rico (San Juan; note that Puerto Rico is the nation with the third strongest LDS presence that doesn't have a temple in any phase
4. Russia (Moscow; the Church seems to really be expanding in Russia; note that Russia is the nation with the fourth strongest LDS presence that doesn't have a temple in any phase)
5. Kiribati (Tarawa; note that Kiribati is the nation with the fifth strongest LDS presence that doesn't have a temple in any phase)
6. Sierra Leone (Freetown; may be announced soon due to extensive Church growth in Africa; note that Sierra Leone is the nation with the sixth strongest LDS presence that doesn't have a temple in any phase)
7. American Samoa (Pago Pago; note that American Samoa is the nation with the seventh strongest LDS presence that doesn't have a temple in any phase)
8. Uganda (Kampala; may be announced soon due to extensive Church growth in Africa; note that Uganda is the nation with the eighth strongest LDS presence that doesn't have a temple in any phase)
9. Cambodia (Phnom Penh; please note that Cambodia is the nation with the ninth strongest LDS presence that doesn't have a temple in any phase; I favor this location because my brother-in-law served his mission there)
10. Nairobi Kenya Temple (proposed in 1998 by President Gordon B. Hinckley; note that Kenya is the nation with the tenth strongest LDS presence that doesn't have a temple in any phase)
11. Bentonville Arkansas (According to my team leader at work who served a mission in that region and who follows Church milestones there religiously (pun intended), a lot for a temple has already been purchased there and an announcement of that temple will happen when Church growth warrants it. How soon that will be remains to be seen.)
12. Montana (Missoula; identified by Elder David A. Bednar as a potential temple site)
13. Southwest Salt Lake Valley Temple (proposed in 2005 by President Gordon B. Hinckley; the site has already been purchased and an official announcement will happen when Church activity warrants it)
14. DR Congo (Kasai region/Likashi; recent extensive and expansive growth in the DR Congo seems to bear out the inevitability of a second and even third temple for this region. A temple for Kasai region was publicly proposed by Elder Neil L. Andersen in February of this year)
15. Hungary (Budapest; the difficulty in getting to the Kyiv Ukraine temple, along with growth in the area, makes it a good candidate for a temple)
16. Nigeria (Lagos/Benin City)
17. Ghana (Kumasi)
18. Mongolia (Ulaanbaatar; I favor this location because a good friend served his mission there. The growth of the Church there may be indicative of the need for a temple.)
19. Bolivia (La Paz; I favor La Paz because my favorite bishop, a close friend, served his mission there. He shared a little bit of Bolivian culture with our ward during his service as bishop because, in addition to giving each returning missionary their plaque, at the conclusion of their service, he also gave them a Bolivian abrasso)
20. South Dakota (Rapid City; I favor this location because my dad served his mission there)
21. New Zealand (Auckland)
22. Indonesia (Jakarta; a site I favor because a good friend served his mission there)
23 Wyoming (Cody; makes more sense for a potential temple than Cheyenne)
24. Idaho (Pocatello; the one major city in Idaho that does not already have a temple)
25. Spain (Barcelona, which seems more likely as a temple site than Malaga, where a good friend served her mission; note that I feel there will be a temple in both cities in the future)
26. Tooele Utah (a somewhat overlooked site that makes sense)
27. Heber Utah  (could be a dark horse choice, as it would be unexpected but needed)
28. Mapleton Utah (another site that could benefit from a temple; how likely it is remains to be seen)
29. Scoland (It was brought to my attention that Ireland or Scotland would be a good location for a temple. Of the two, I think Scotland is more likely, and Brother Satterfield agrees with me; though it's admittedly another dark horse candidate.)
30. Czech Republic (Ostrava; I’m sure President Uchtdorf would love to see a temple in his homeland)
31. Lehi Utah (I favor this location because my wife grew up there and it seems to be expanding at an astonishing rate, including the LDS presence)
32. Texas (El Paso/Corpus Christi/Fort Worth; of the three I don't know which I favor more or might be more likely: El Paso has more of a Church presence, but Corpus Christi is a region familiar to my mom who served part of her mission there and a good friend of mine served her mission in Fort Worth , so any one of the three would be good)
33. Austria (Vienna; I favor this location because my wife served her mission there)
34. Norway (Oslo; another dark horse choice)
35. Guatemala (Guatemala City (2nd temple))/San Cristobal)
36. Mexico (Mexico City (2nd temple))/Quezon City)
37. Chile (Santiago (2nd temple))/Valparaiso)
38. Philippines (Manila (2nd temple))/Quezon City/Davao
39. Argentina (Buenos Aires (2nd temple)/Bellville/La Plata)
40. Brazil (Sao Paulo (2nd temple)/Belo Horizonte/Brasilia (Note on Brasilia: Brother Satterfield has told me he thinks this is a very likely possibility)
41. Ivory Coast (One or two additional temples; might be needed due to extensive growth in the area)
42. Honduras (San Pedro Sula)
43. India (New Delhi; temple publicly proposed by Neal A. Maxwell in June 1992)
44. Lithuania (Vilnius; temple publicly proposed by M. Russell Ballard in May 1993)
45. Venezuela (Maracaibo; temple publicly proposed by Gordon B. Hinckley in August 1999)
46. Singapore (temple publicly proposed by  Gordon B. Hinckley in January 2000)
47. Vietnam (Hanoi; may be a bit early for a temple; but the odds for it are increased by the fact of Vietnam granting official recognition to the Church earlier this year, especially as any Vietnamese Church members are travelling a long distance to the nearest temple.

My observations about this list:
1. Managua Nicaragua and Port Moresby have already had a site identified, as have Bentonville Arkansas and perhaps also Missoula Montana (The former is definite, the latter is heresay). Therefore, these are in the top four in my mind.
2. I would probably get rid of the possibility of a Russian temple for the moment simply because of the religious restrictions imposed by President Putin.
3. Of the seven temples that have been announced since last year's end of the two-year hiatus in temple announcements, none have been in the US (including Utah), 2 have been in Africa (Abidjan Ivory Coast and Harare Zimbabwe,) 1 in the Pacific (Bangkok Thailand), 1 in a European-owned island (Port-au-Price Haiti) and 3 from South America (Lima Peru Los Olivos, Belem Brazil, and Quito Ecuador). I therefore can see where, especially with growth in Africa and South America, more temples may be announced there. It has been a while since we saw a temple announced in Europe, which makes the ones in Spain, Ireland and Hungary likely, though I could be wrong.
4. It is very rare to only have two temples in construction in Utah (Cedar City Utah is anticipated to be completed next year, and Jordan River is being renovated). This makes another Utah temple likely. What I'd like to see there is a narrowing-down to about two or three Utah cities that are most likely for a temple announcement.
5. Some observations about the cities for which I predicted a 2nd temple: I would probably go for a temple in other cities before a 2nd for any of the cities above. The announcement of the Lima Peru Los Olivos temple makes a 2nd temple for these cities likely, but if I had to narrow it down, I would say this:
a. Brasilia in Brazil has been particularly mentioned to me.
b. So has Valparaiso in Chile.
c. Quezon City or Davao seems likely for the Philippines.
d. Quezon City seems most likely for Mexico.
e. Villa Nueva may be a more likely possibility for Guatemala than a second Guatemala City temple. or the one I proposed for San Cristobal.
6. I would likely trim down this list to the top 15-20, then refine it further as conference approaches.
Thoughts?
  

5 comments:

  1. The Manila Philippines Temple is in Quezon City, not Manila. Quezon City is actually the largest city in the Philippines, and is on the north side of Metro Manila, which is notorious for its terrible traffic. If another temple will go up in Metro Manila, it would be more practical to place it on the south side, perhaps in ParaƱaque or Alabang. Such a temple would be well-received by the members, who would fill it. Davao, at the south end of the country, and one of the nicest cities in the Philippines, would make sense. But I don't think there will be another temple announced in the Philippines until there is significant progress on the the slow-in-coming temple to be built in Urdaneta.

    ReplyDelete
  2. This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Knowledge is power, and I did not know what you shared with me. Based on that, I will revise my Philippines prediction to Davao. Thanks for the feedback.

    ReplyDelete
  4. This comment has been removed by the author.

    ReplyDelete
  5. I just looked over my revised list of predictions, and Davao Philippines was already on there, and Quezon City had been removed. Please find my updated list at the address below: http://stokessoundsoff.blogspot.com/2016/07/more-work-on-list-of-soon-to-be.html

    ReplyDelete

In addition to my life-long love for the subjects which I cover in the posts of this blog, I have long held the belief that we can disagree without becoming disagreeable. Differences of opinion are natural, while being disagreeable in expressing those differences is not. And in that sense, I have no desire to close the door on anyone who earnestly desires to contribute to the ongoing dialogue on subjects covered in the posts on this blog.

At the same time, however, I recognize that we live in a time when incivility, discourtesy, unkindness, and even cyber-bullying has regrettably become part of online interactions. With that in mind, while anyone who wishes can comment on anything if they choose to do so, I hereby reserve the right to immediately delete any comments which are critical, unkind, lack civility, or promote prodcuts, services, and values contrary to either the Church, or to the rules of online etiquette.

I'd also like to remind all who comment here that I try to respond personally to each individual comment as I feel is appropriate. Such replies are not meant to end the conversation, but to acknowledge earnest feedback as it is submitted.

And in order to better preserve the spirit and pure intentions for which this blog was established, I also hereby request that anyone not commenting with a regular user name (particularly those whose comments appear under the "Unknown" or "Anonymous" monikers, give the rest of us a name to work with in addressing any replies. If such individuals do not wish to disclose their actual given names, a pseudonym or nickname would suffice.

Any comments made by individuals who opt to not give a name by which they can ber identified may, depending on the substance and tone of such comments, be subject to deletion as well. I would respectfully ask that all of us do all we can to keep the dialogue positive, polite, and without malice or ill-will. May the Lord bless us all in our discussion of these important matters.