Hello. Though it has been promised by me for weeks, I was today finally able to complete my update for the timeline which I feel will prevail for when future temple-related events might be announced and scheduled. My thoughts on the matter follow. As always, I welcome any feedback because, at the end of the day, I am just one person and am far from infallible. With that in mind, here is that update.
It continues to fascinate me how different
temples in different parts of the world take different lengths of time to
complete for a variety of reasons. It is wonderful to consider that these next
three years will be largely focused on seeing temple-related events announced
and scheduled worldwide. I also find it amazing to consider that some temples
that are not yet announced might have construction start within that same time
as well, depending on where they are located and how any difficulties with
getting that construction started might be dealt with.
I would like to think that a site
announcement for the Harare Zimbabwe Temple will be coming soon, but since that
has not happened yet, that announcement is more likely to come later this year.
More on that later. I also am hoping for and anticipating that a minimum of 3
new temples will be announced during General Conference, but I am personally
hoping for more than that. It will be interesting to see how my personal picks
will compare this time to any that are announced.
The next temple event is therefore the already-scheduled
dedication of the Church’s 156th temple in Paris France. The open
house for that temple will span three weeks (but oddly four Saturdays),
starting on Saturday April 22 (which falls exactly three weeks after General
Conference), and going through Saturday May 13, excluding the relevant Sundays (which,
as before mentioned, are April 23 and 30, and May 7). One week after the end of
the open house, the cultural celebration will be held, and the temple
dedication will take place the next day (Sunday May 21). I have before ventured
my opinion that President Dieter F. Uchtdorf, our European apostle, will
preside, and be accompanied by Elder Neil L. Andersen, who served his mission
in France, and French-born Presiding Bishop Gerald Causse. I have also mentioned
why I feel a personal connection to this temple. And the time it took for this
temple to get from announcement to dedication is 5 years, 7 months, and 20 days
(5.64 years when rounded to the nearest hundredth), which is right in line with
the general timeline I have before observed of 3-15 years for temples outside
the United States to be built.
We next have the rededication for the Idaho
Falls Idaho Temple set to take place exactly two weeks after the dedication of
the Paris France Temple. Open house tickets for the Idaho Falls open house will
be available on Monday April 3, the day following General Conference weekend.
The open house event will span 28 days, starting, coincidentally enough, on the
same day as the open house for the Paris France Temple, and it will end on
Saturday May 20 (excluding the Sundays of April 23 & 30 and May 7 & 14).
The cultural celebration for this temple will be held the first Saturday in
June, with the dedication the next day. I have before mentioned that I am
certain that either President Henry B. Eyring or Elder David A. Bednar will
preside at this rededication. I could see either as being a feasible option.
Whoever presides there, it is likely that Elder Neil L. Andersen, a native to
the area, will accompany them. The Star Valley precedent where Elder Bednar
presided in view of his wife’s ties to the area open the possibility that Elder
Andersen could preside at the event himself due to his personal ties to the
temple, but we have never had such a junior apostle do that at any time. So I
think it unlikely. The rededication will mark the official conclusion of the
temple’s renovation process, which will have spanned 2 years, 2 months, and 19
days (or, rounded to the nearest hundredth, 2.22 years, which holds true to the
pattern of renovations taking between 1-3 years generally) by that time.
Unless we have other temple-related events
(like a groundbreaking or site announcements), the next events chronologically
will be the already-scheduled dedications for the remaining three temples under
construction in the United States. I do want to mention that I have my own
thoughts about when future groundbreakings for other temples will take place,
but as I have learned recently, such things are much harder to pin down than I
originally believe. For that reason, I will not list my thoughts on future
groundbreakings as I believe, hope, and am predicting they will happen, but
will defer discussion of that future events until I have discussed the timeline
I feel will prevail for the dedications or rededications of temples now under
construction or renovation, or those that are soon anticipated to be so.
The Church will start accepting renovations
for the Tucson Arizona Temple open house the Monday preceding the dedication of
the Paris France Temple (May 15, a significant day in Church history, as it is
the anniversary of the restoration of the Aaronic Priesthood). That open house
will be held during the 3-week period spanning the Saturdays of June 3 and 24
(with the obvious exception of the Sundays of June 4, 11, and 18). This temple
will be the first in quite a while for which there will be a gap of around 1.67
months between the end of the open house and the dedication, and that is, as
previously noted, because of the annual July recess taken by General
Authorities.
The cultural celebration will take place on
Saturday August 12, and the dedication of this temple will follow the day
after, which will be 8 days before President Monson celebrates his 90th
birthday. Given that President Dieter F. Uchtdorf was the one to preside at
this groundbreaking, it would make sense if he were asked to return to dedicate
this temple. The dedication will signal the completion of the temple, which,
from announcement to dedication, will have spanned a period of 4 years, 10
months, and 7 days (4.85 decimal years), which holds pretty well the pattern of
temples in the United States taking roughly 3-5 years from announcement to
dedication.
It is almost certain that President Eyring
will return to Idaho to preside at the next dedication in Meridian three months
later. That dedication will follow the three-week open house, scheduled to take
place between the Saturdays of October 21 and November 11 (excepting the
Sundays of October 22 and 29 and November 5). It may be a while yet before we
hear when reservations for the open house might start being made available. As
with the rededication for the Idaho Falls Idaho Temple, it would not surprise
me in any way if Elder Bednar and Elder Andersen are in attendance at the
dedication for Meridian. I am not now ruling out the possibility of someone
else presiding. There has been enough past precedent to indicate that nothing
is certain in that regard. But if President Eyring or Elder Bednar do not preside
at that dedication, I don’t know who else might be asked. The dedication
scheduled there, set to take place the night after the cultural celebration on
November 18, will mark the end of the construction which by that time will have
spanned 6 years, 7 months, and 17 days. (That works out to 6.63 years, just
slightly more than the 3-5 years that generally prevail as a timetable for
temples built within the United States. It should be noted, however, that
construction took just over three years once it actually commenced. So in that
respect, it did follow the typical timetable noted above.)
Three weeks after the dedication of Idaho’s
newest temple, its sister-state, Utah, will have its 17th temple
dedicated. I could see President Uchtdorf presiding at that dedication, or
possibly even Elder Jeffrey R. Holland, who grew up in St. George, which is
seen as somewhat of a sister-city to Cedar City. It is almost certain that we
will have several General Authorities in attendance at that dedication, as has
been the tradition for Utah temples.
That dedication has been confirmed as the
last one that will take place this year. And it is interesting to note that,
typical to the usual pattern for the construction of Utah temples (which generally
have taken 1-3 years between announcement and dedication, but may span twice
that long for some others), the Cedar City Temple will be dedicated 4 years, 8
months, and 4 days, or 4.68 years from its announcement to its dedication, which
is a pretty even average between its site announcement and groundbreaking, and
between the groundbreaking and dedication.)
One thing about the Cedar City dedication
that has kind of been a downer for me personally: where the temple dedication
in Paris will be carried to the whole nation and the Tucson and Meridian dedications
will be broadcast throughout the entire states of Arizona and Idaho, the temple
dedication in Cedar City will only be carried to the units that will fall
within the district of that temple. That is not at all uncommon, as it has been
known to happen before. However, it has generally been a tradition for temples
in Utah to have dedications carried to the entire state. Because my wife and I
were too ill to attend the last Utah temple dedication that was carried
statewide, for the Provo City Center Temple (historically significant by virtue
of not only being built from a burnt-down local icon, but also for becoming the
150th operating temple of the Church), I had high hopes of being
able to attend this dedication. That aside, I certainly hope that more temples
will be announced in the United States in general and for Utah in particular in
the not-too-distant future. That dedication has been confirmed as the last one that will take place this year.
Since no other temples will be dedicated or rededicated this year, that brings us to temples that might be
dedicated next year. Jordan River, Rome, Kinshasa, and Freiberg are the first
four we will likely see in 2018. When might those happen? By all accounts, the
work on all four temples is on track, and they might be interchangeable in
terms of when that might happen. But it is not uncommon for renovations to be
finished before the construction of new temples is finalized. And even though I
have thought that the temple in Rome might be the last of these four to be
dedicated, by all accounts, that temple is on track to be the first one
dedicated next year.
In light of that, I think it would be safe to
assume that we might see an announcement for all four events possibly at the
same time, in the final months of 2017. As to specific dedications, it would
not be hard to believe that the Jordan River Utah Temple might be rededicated
in late January or early February, that Rome could be next with a dedication in
late February or early March, that Freiberg would be finished in late March and
the dedication held either in the weeks after General Conference or in early-to-mid
May, and that the Kinshasa dedication could take place in either late May or
early June. As the four are seemingly interchangeable in terms of their
completion timeline, it would not surprise me at all if any of these four
happened sooner than anticipated. That said, it is sure that none of them will
happen any sooner than January next year.
While things happen with this temple, we will
have two temples commence the renovation process. The Oakland California Temple
will be closed in February 2018 (I believe as of the very beginning of the
month) for a complete overhaul. The renovation is expected to last at least a
year. One month later, the Washington DC Temple will close for renovation,
which is expected to span roughly two years. I will speak more about my
estimate for when those will be completed later on.
In the meantime, the Barranquilla Colombia
Temple, the next one that might be completed, could have a dedication
announcement by sometime in March or April, with the dedication itself perhaps
taking place in June. If that is not possible, it is very likely that the open
house will finish in June and that the actual dedication might take place in
early August, after the General Authorities have their traditional July recess.
This is especially likely given the precedent that was set in this regard with
the Tucson Arizona Temple open house and dedication that was announced in January.
I could see the temples in Concepcion and
Durban being finished by the time fall starts in 2018. The dedications
themselves could take place in early-to-mid November (Concepcion) and early
December (for Durban).
The Winnipeg Manitoba Temple construction,
though started with a groundbreaking late last year, is only expected to begin
in earnest following the end of a really bad Canadian winter, in either April
or May, and is expected to last 20 months minimum. If the construction is able
to stay on track, that 20-month time period will be over sometime between the
beginning of December 2018 and the end of January 2019. With that in mind, it
is not hard to believe that the dedication might take place in either late March
or a week or two after the April General Conference.
The new information I have received seems to
indicate that the completion of the Fortaleza Brazil Temple would be next, and that this might happen within the first few months of
2019. With that in mind, the dedication could take place in early-to-md May.
The Oakland California temple renovation,
which, as mentioned above, will start in February of 2018, is expected to last
around a year. So I could see that renovation being completed around 15 months
after it commences, which would put that completion around May of 2019. It
would make sense if the open house takes place following the 2019 July recess
for General Authorities, and if the dedication itself happens in late August or
early September.
In the meantime, the next temple-related
event, based on that new information, would be the dedication of the temple in
Rio de Janeiro. Depending on how long it takes construction to commence (which
should happen at any time), I could see that construction being completed prior
to the July recess. If that happens, it is not hard to believe that a
dedication would follow in early-to-mid September.
The next event would then be the dedication
of Portugal’s first temple, which could be completed round about August or
September next year. If that happens, a dedication would follow either in late
October or early November.
Depending on how long construction in
Arequipa Peru takes, it might be completed in either late 2019 or early 2020.
Thinking and speaking optimistically, which I always try to do, I will say that
I could see construction completed round about the time General Conference
concludes in October 2019. If that happens, then a dedication would follow
sometime in December.
The renovation of the temple in the capital
city of the United States, set to begin in March of 2018, is slated to take
roughly two years. With that and the fact that renovations are often completed
much more swiftly than the construction of new temples, it is not unreasonable,
in my opinion, to assume that the renovations could finish sometime around
March of 2020, which would mean that a rededication could take place sometime
in May. I would love to see things finish sooner than that, but I want to be as
conservative as possible.
Additional future temple-related events that
might take place during the remainder of 2019 and the following year, 2020,
will largely be determined by what happens in temple-related developments this
year and next year. If the construction in Harare begins at any point this
year, depending on how soon that happens, it could very well be that the
completion of construction on that temple could happen in the early months of
2020, with a dedication following around the same time as the previous
rededication. But it will all depend on how quickly that site announcement and
the subsequent groundbreaking happen. More on that subject in a moment.
If the above schedule is observed, the Church
will add 4 new operating temples and have one rededication by the end of 2017,
and five additional dedications and two rededications done during 2018. In
2019, we could see 5 dedications and 1 rededication. I am not going to rule out
the possibility of more renovations being announced this year and being
completed by 2019 as well, and it could be that any other temples that commence
construction this year might also be completed before the end of 2019. The
complexity involved in predicting the timing of these future events is not as
cut-and-dried as I have believed it to be.
The so-called backlog that once existed has
long-since been done away with, raising the likelihood of more temples being
announced in the next year or so. And I have given my thoughts and feelings on
the refined predictions for those sites recently. With General Conference
coming up next weekend, there is every chance that we will see at least a few
temple announcements. (I am anticipating a minimum of 3, but hoping for many
more.) I will be excited to report on that as I am able to.
As for future groundbreakings, they may be
more unpredictable to anticipate than I originally thought. I look at the
groundbreaking in Winnipeg, and it happened much faster than usual. And with
the way things unfolded in Rio and Arequipa, though there was a significant
time period between when they were announced and when ground was broken, those
groundbreakings happened very quickly. It is significant that full-scale construction
is pending on all three, but the Brazil and Peru construction is anticipated to
begin in earnest at any time, and Winnipeg will, as noted, follow in April or
May, though they will be completed at very different intervals.
In the meantime, there is more than a
sufficient reason to believe that the groundbreakings for temples that have not
had that happen as of yet might happen in the following order:
As the Harare site announcement is
anticipated at some point this year, it could happen anytime. But my current
study indicates that a groundbreaking might only happen by the middle or latter
part of this year. And it is very likely that the Harare Zimbabwe Temple will
be the last temple to have a groundbreaking this year. If others happen this
year, it wouldn’t surprise me, but that doesn’t seem to be nearly as likely as
I once felt it was.
In the meantime, next year could be a big
year for groundbreakings. Since the site for the first Haitian temple in
Port-au-Prince was confirmed earlier this month, there is every chance that a
groundbreaking for that temple could happen in early-to-mid 2018. The same
timeline might very well hold true for the Bangkok Thailand temple, which has
not yet had a site confirmed, but which might have an existing building
renovated and repurposed as a multipurpose edifice akin to the buildings that
now house not only the temples in Manhattan New York and Hong Kong China, but
Church offices and meetinghouses as well.
In the meantime, while an exact site has yet
to be announced and confirmed, the second temple in Lima Peru, whose name was
specified last year as the Lima Peru Los Olivos Temple, will likely be built in
the Peruvian district from whence its name originates. This means that it is
more likely to have a groundbreaking well in advance of any of the other
temples, and it is my feeling that such an event might happen in mid-2018.
The second Ecuadoran temple, set to be built
in the capital city of Quito, will likely not see the delays in construction
commencement that prevailed for the first temple in that nation, as the time
span between the site announcement and groundbreaking was 14 years, 4 months,
and 10 days, or 14.36 years. As that particular time span is the Church record,
at least in recent years, for the longest such period, I don’t see a similar
situation prevailing for Quito, particularly since South America’s perception
of temples have changed so much since then, and since the unprecedented growth
in South America has quickened and eliminated the need for such delays going
forward. For that reason, it wouldn’t surprise me to see this groundbreaking
happen in either late 2018 or early 2019.
Given the average time frame I have observed
as generally prevailing between the announcement of any Brazilian temple and
its groundbreaking, especially lately, it is my feeling and opinion that the
groundbreaking for Brazil’s ninth temple, in the city of Belem, will take place
in early-to-mid 2019. I would love to see it happen sooner, but that seems to
be the best prediction I can give for the moment.
While I constantly and consistently hope to
hear news that the current delays preventing progress towards construction on
the Urdaneta Philippines Temple have cleared enough for a site to be announced
and a groundbreaking scheduled, and in spite of the fact that it is the only
temple announced back in October 2010 that has not yet had a groundbreaking, I
have not seen sufficient reason to move it up on my list of near-future
possibilities for a groundbreaking to happen. It would be wonderful indeed if
that temple could commence construction sooner than many, including myself,
believe will happen, but right now, it doesn’t seem to be anywhere close to
having that happen. For that reason, I believe we will only see a groundbreaking
for that temple in mid-to-late 2019. Stay tuned for any update as I hear of it.
In these projections, I am always open to
suggestion, clarification, and correction. Please feel free to share any
feedback you might have for me. Thanks for taking time to read this post. I
look forward to hearing of all future temple-related developments, and I will
do my level best to report on such things as I hear of them. Thank you!
On this blog, I, James Stokes, share insights and analysis covering the latest news and developments reported about The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints. My specific emphasis and focus is on the ministry of our current apostles, General Conference, and up-to-date temple information. This site is neither officially owned, operated, or endorsed by the Church, and I, as the autthor thereof, am solely responsible for this content.
Search This Blog
Monday, March 27, 2017
Fulfilling the Promise to Post an Updated Timeline by which Future Temple-related Events Might Be Announced and Scheduled
I have had a lifelong love for Church history, which has extended to ongoing reports of the ministry of our apostles and prophets, General Conference, and all temple developments. This blog enables me to share that love with all who read my thoughts on these developments, which are sometimes reported multiple times per day as needed.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment
In addition to my life-long love for the subjects which I cover in the posts of this blog, I have long held the belief that we can disagree without becoming disagreeable. Differences of opinion are natural, while being disagreeable in expressing those differences is not. And in that sense, I have no desire to close the door on anyone who earnestly desires to contribute to the ongoing dialogue on subjects covered in the posts on this blog.
At the same time, however, I recognize that we live in a time when incivility, discourtesy, unkindness, and even cyber-bullying has regrettably become part of online interactions. With that in mind, while anyone who wishes can comment on anything if they choose to do so, I hereby reserve the right to immediately delete any comments which are critical, unkind, lack civility, or promote prodcuts, services, and values contrary to either the Church, or to the rules of online etiquette.
I'd also like to remind all who comment here that I try to respond personally to each individual comment as I feel is appropriate. Such replies are not meant to end the conversation, but to acknowledge earnest feedback as it is submitted.
And in order to better preserve the spirit and pure intentions for which this blog was established, I also hereby request that anyone not commenting with a regular user name (particularly those whose comments appear under the "Unknown" or "Anonymous" monikers, give the rest of us a name to work with in addressing any replies. If such individuals do not wish to disclose their actual given names, a pseudonym or nickname would suffice.
Any comments made by individuals who opt to not give a name by which they can ber identified may, depending on the substance and tone of such comments, be subject to deletion as well. I would respectfully ask that all of us do all we can to keep the dialogue positive, polite, and without malice or ill-will. May the Lord bless us all in our discussion of these important matters.