Stokes Sounds Off: BREAKING NEWS: Exceptions Approved for Male Missionary Attire

Search This Blog

Leaderboard

Friday, June 12, 2020

BREAKING NEWS: Exceptions Approved for Male Missionary Attire

Hello again, everyone! Some of you might recall that in December 2018, the First Presidency had approved some attire exceptions for young sister missionaries, where climate, culture, or tradition made it a logical move. At the time that change was announced, Elder Dieter F. Uchtdorf had remarked that such changes were part of the history of the Church, as previous adjustments had been made when practical, feasuble, or neccessary. He also indicated at that time that further adjustments would come in the future as necessary. Fast forward to today: In another First Presidency announcement, as corroborated by both the Newsroom and the Church News, and as again contextualized through comments from Elder Uchtdorf, adjustments were announced for male missionary attire, where approved by area presidencies. Although minor adjustments have been made to missionary attire for young males where cultural, climate, or political situations have necessitated that, the latest adjustments are meant to present general acceptable options the area presidency can consider for the young men serving in their areas. These changes include an allowance for the wearing of white or blue dress shirts with or without ties. This does not change the standard that, in most areas where there is no need for them, continues to be a white shirt and tie, with or without a suit jacket. That attire continues to apply specifically when young elders participate in mission conferences at any level, for attendance at baptisms, in temple worship, and during the weekly worship services. And only after very careful consideration would these exceptions be used. As seen recently with new editions of the scriptures, and changes in missionary contact regulations, it is neither recommended or required that current missionaries granted the exception to the standard missionary dress purchase new clothes right away based on these changes. Instead, as wear and tear occur in current attire, the new clothes can be rotated in. The coverage of this announcement also provides an overview of other changes to missionary attire made by area since 2010. Further contextual comments from Elder Uchtdorf describe this change as an opening, rather than a downgrade or diminishing of the long-standing practices related to male missionary attire. He also noted that the hope is that these exceptions may, in some cases, extend and expand opportunities for community outreach and for missionaries to connect and interact with individuals and families.

On a personal note, I have some experience with a non-standard missionary dress scenario. Although I obviously wore a white shirt when engaged in my six years of service as a temple worker. when it came to my Welfare Services missionary labors, a butto-up shirt of any style was the standard. It makes snese that missionary dress standards continue to be adjusted as necessary or advisable. As with other new changes which have been announced.Toccurred to me that it is amazing that, in the midst of managing the impacts of a global pandemic, including a phased reopening of temples, announcements continue to be made about weekly worship services, temple events, General Conference, and so many other aspects related to the work. The laser-sharp focus on the most important matters relating to the work continues to amaze, astound, and astonish me. We are truly seeing, as President Nelson noted two years ago in Rome Italy, that the work is moving at an accelerated pace, and that unfolding revelation continues to further that work in all facets relating thereunto. For my part, to the very best of my ability, I will keep monitoring all such developments and will pass word of those along to you all as I become aware of them.

That does it for now. Any and all comments are, as always, welcome and appreciated, on any post at any time, as long as such comments are made in accordance with the established guidelines. Thank you for the privilege of your time. If you enjoyed what you read here and would like to stay informed of newly added content, please feel free to subscribe. Until my next post, I wish each one of you all the best and pray that the Lord will bless you all in everything you do.

10 comments:

  1. Hello again, everyone! As some of you might recall my mentioning, the Auckland New Zealand Temple had its' groundbreaking planned for Saturday June 13 @ 11:00 AM NZST, with a delayed broadcast set for Sunday June 14 @ 6:00 PM NZST. Given that I have not heard anything different, and that, based on the time difference between Utah and New Zealand, it is now almost 2:00 PM on Saturday afternoon on that island, the groundbreaking must have occurred roughly 3 hours or so ago. And with the delayed broadcast of that event being planned for 6:00 PM Sunday evenining in New Zealand, that broadcast will occur at midnight here in Utah when tomorrow (Saturday) transitions into Sunday. Again, for all who are interested, that groundbreaking can be viewed at the followoing web address at that time:

    https://pacific.churchofjesuschrist.org/auckland-temple-groundbreaking

    That broadcast can also be seen via the Pacific Area Facebook page:

    https://www.facebook.com/ChurchofJesusChristPacific/

    That means that, as of right now, the Church has a total of 18 teemples in various phases of the construction process, with 2 more that have groundbreakings scheduled. Once those two groundbreakings occur within the next two months or so, the Church will then have 38 announced temples in its' queue. As I mentioned in a previous post, the recent announcement about the arrangements for the Salta Argentina Temple groundbreaking makes that temple the sixth of the 18 total referenced by Elder Bednar last April which are planned to have a groundbreaking this year. After the Salta groundbreaking on Saturday August 15, the Church will have 4.5 months in which to break ground for the remaining 12 temples, which means that roughly 3 temples will need to have a groundbreaking in each of the remaining 4 months. As I previously observed, that amounts to just about 1 per week.

    That being said, I am hopeful things are being set in motion to enable us to soon see action on the Tooele Valley, Orem, Taylorsville, and Washington County Utah Temples, in addition to the smaller temples planned for Moses Lake Washington, McAllen Texas, and Bentonville Arkansas Temples. Since I have not heard recently from my Central American Church member contact, I can only guess how close the Coban Guatemala Temple might be to a groundbreaking, or how soon we may see a more official announcement on the Managua Nicaragua and San Pedro Sula Honduras Temples. Likewise, since COVID-19 was enough to cause a delay for both the Rio de Janeiro Brazil Temple dedication and the 2020 Summer Olympics in Tokyo, I am not sure how soon we could see action on either the Brasilia Brazil or Okinawa Japan Temples.

    And I absolutely have no idea on what the current status is for the Phnom Pehn Cambodia and Bengaluru India Temples, with so many unknowns there. There is sufficient civil unrest in many areas of the world in which a temple has been announced that make it nearly impossible to gauge how soon anything may be done about the temples in their lands. So at this point, even though I have shared thoughts about the most likely temples to have a groundbreaking later this year, it could really be any temple currently in my sights, or any of the other announced ones for which a surprise announcement is made.

    Sorry. That's more musing than I meant to do here. I continue to monitor those developments and will pass word of any news ASAP as I hear of it. In the meantime, my thanks once again to you all.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Additionally, the Newsroom at some point today provided updates on how Church Distribution and Deseret Book stores are reopening. Those stores follow a 4-phase plan, and surprisingly, a fair number are already in phases 2 and 3, with some almost ready to go to phase 4:

    https://newsroom.churchofjesuschrist.org/multimedia/file/church-distribution-retail-stores.pdf

    Reopening information has been provided for quite a few Deseret Industries stores as well, with some of that information also having been updated as of today:

    https://www.deseretindustries.org/reopen

    Thanks again, everyone!

    ReplyDelete
  3. And within the last few hours, the Newsroom has provided an article about the small-scale groundbreaking being held for the Alabang Philippines Temple:

    https://news-ph.churchofjesuschrist.org/article/small-scale-groundbreaking-held-for-alabang-philippines-temple

    My thanks once again to you all.

    ReplyDelete
  4. And another article, published on the Pacific Newsroom site, covers the groundbreaking for the Auckland New Zeland Temple:

    https://news-nz.churchofjesuschrist.org/article/church-and-community-leaders-break-ground-to-officially-commence-auckland-temple-construction

    I am hopeful that both temples might see full-scale construction begin soon. I will be sure to monitor all such news and bring you word of it here. In the meantime, my thanks once again to you all.

    ReplyDelete
  5. Hello again, everyone! Earlier today, the Church News provided coverage on the groundbreakings for the Auckland New Zealand and Alabang Philippines Temples:

    https://www.thechurchnews.com/temples/2020-06-13/auckland-new-zealand-alabang-philippines-temple-groundbreaking-186822

    Above and beyond that, it appears that construction had been temporarily stalled on the Praia Cabo Verde Temple due to COVID-19, and with those delays having ended, structural support is rising. I have previously offered my opinion that the timing for the Pocatello Idaho Temple completion could potentially be moved up, and I consequently changed my estimate for its' dedication to mid-to-late 2021. Depending on the continued progress for the Pocatello Idaho Temple vs. any lack thereof for the Praia Cabo Verde Temple, it's possible Pocatello may move ahead of Praia in that queue, although it seems too close to call for the time being.

    ReplyDelete
  6. It has also been noted on the Quito Ecuador Temple that construction has been delayed for the time being due to COVID-19. After having evaluated that situation, along with the similar ongoing situation for the Urdaneta Philippines Temple, I have done some rearranging on my personal temple construction progress report. The changes I have made there are not currently supported by any sources I use for temple updates: they just seemed wise on my end. Since a new report on the Belem Brazil Temple indicates that construction is continuing under the cover of a dome, I have moved that temple up on my list to be below the Abidjan temple. But with the completion for the Abidjan temple anticipated by the end of next year or the beginning of the year following that, I have kept my estimate for Belem's completion at mid-2022. I then moved Quito under Belem, with the same time-frame. And while I hope the delays for Urdaneta will not be as drastic as I fear they might be, Urdaneta is now under Quito on my personal list, with my general completion estimate for that temple shifted to mid-to-late 2022. I hope to be able to revert those adjustments if COVID-19 conditions improve in Quito or Urdaneta, but felt to be more cautious until that time.

    Next, what several of my sources for temple information have done is note that the Richmond Virginia, Layton Utah, and Auckland New Zealand Temples could all be completed in a general window during late 2022-early 2023, if all goes well. The temples are currently in that order of completion, but the progress (or lack thereof) for any of them could change that.

    That resulted in the completion of the Bangkok Thailand Temple being moved down underneath those 3, but still in the same general completion window (mid-2023). The same general completion window has been offered for the Alabang Philippines Temple as well, suggesting that either could be completed first. But it is also possible that other temples for which progress occurrs more swiftly could push either or both of those further back, particularly if either or both have progress stalled or halted by COVID-19 as well.

    ReplyDelete
  7. As I mentioned yesterday, the inscription stone has been removed from the stake center currently on the site of the Taylorsville Utah Temple. At the moment, it is anyone's guess which of 3 Utah Temples (Tooele Valley, Taylorsville, and Orem) might be the next to have a groundbreaking. Right now, I am predicting Tooele Valley, then Orem, then Taylorsville, but that will depend on a variety of currently-unknown factors. I am also in the process of reevaluating as needed the general estimates I have provided for the next potential temples to have a groundbreaking. More to come on that later.

    In the meantime, at the St. George Utah Temple, the walls of the new annex are going up, and landscaping continues, while for the Salt Lake Temple, the foundation is being stabilized, and the annex is being demolished, while the removal of the angel Moroni and the surrounding stones has been completed.

    I hope the updates I have provided herein are helpful to all who read them. Thanks again to you all for your continued interest and ongoing support.

    ReplyDelete
  8. Hello again, everyone! The Church News has shared the following additional reports:

    https://www.thechurchnews.com/living-faith/2020-06-14/covid-19-sunday-worship-at-home-resume-meetings-186561

    https://www.thechurchnews.com/leaders-and-ministry/2020-06-14/covid-19-missionary-work-elder-uchtdorf-video-article-newsroom-186870

    https://www.thechurchnews.com/global/2020-06-14/covid-19-missionary-reassignments-travel-newsroom-video-186845

    Some temple updates will follow. Thanks again, all!

    ReplyDelete
  9. I'm back with the temple updates to which I referred a few moments ago. First of all, I was able to tune in via Facebook last night and watch the delyed rebroadcast of the groundbreaking for the Auckland New Zealand Temple. A couple of things stood out to me there. First of all, under Prime Minister Jacinda Ardern (who happens to be a former member of the Church and the niece of Elder Ian S. Ardern, who serves as Pacific Area President, took great care in guiding preemptive efforts to curb the spread of COVID-19 in New Zealand. As a result, those in attendance at the chapel where the preliminary events (including remarks from the local community leader and a long-time Church member from that area, followed by the dedicatory prayer on the temple plot being offered from the meetinghouse by Elder Ardern) did not have to socially distance as fully as was being done in other areas, such as for the recent Richmond Virginia, Layton Utah, and Alabang Philippines Temple groundbreakings. Secondly, during that service, it was mentioned that the completion of the temple was anticipated in 2023. One or two mentions alluded to "late 2023" as a likely window for the Auckland Temple completion or dedication, but those were the excptions. It was a wonderful groundbreaking service, to be sure, and was 45 mintues and well worthy of your time if you haven't seen it yet.

    That brings me to the other temple updates I wanted to share here. These are not updates on the status of any temples, but rather on the status of the time-frames within which they are anticipated to be completed/dedicated. Based on sources now available to me, I have made the following adjustments to those estimates:

    Mid-to-late 2022: Saratoga Springs Utah Temple
    Late 2022-early 2023: Richmond Virginia Temple
    Early-to-mid 2023: Layton Utah Temple
    Mid-2023: Auckland New Zealand Temple
    Mid-to-late 2023: Alabang Philippines and Bangkok Thailand Temples

    As with any estimate I offer, these time-frames are subject to confirmation, correction, or denial through official announcements from the First Presidency. And based on progress (or the lack thereof) for any of these temples, I will be making any necessary additional adjustments in the future. In the meantime, my thanks once again to you all.

    ReplyDelete
  10. Hello again, everyone! This comment is being posted to inform you all that comment moderation has ended on this blog. The last 2.5 weeks in which it has been in effect has enabled me to curb spam comments, and to permanently block those attempting to spam this blog from commenting again. With commenting moderation no longer in place, if there are spam comments in the future, hopefully those will be able to be nipped in the bud promptly. In the meantime, thanks to you all for bearing with me during this time when I have been dealing with that problem. May the Lord bless us all in our dialogue here as the resuming of normal comments, without moderation, once again becomes the status quo.

    ReplyDelete

In addition to my life-long love for the subjects which I cover in the posts of this blog, I have long held the belief that we can disagree without becoming disagreeable. Differences of opinion are natural, while being disagreeable in expressing those differences is not. And in that sense, I have no desire to close the door on anyone who earnestly desires to contribute to the ongoing dialogue on subjects covered in the posts on this blog.

At the same time, however, I recognize that we live in a time when incivility, discourtesy, unkindness, and even cyber-bullying has regrettably become part of online interactions. With that in mind, while anyone who wishes can comment on anything if they choose to do so, I hereby reserve the right to immediately delete any comments which are critical, unkind, lack civility, or promote prodcuts, services, and values contrary to either the Church, or to the rules of online etiquette.

I'd also like to remind all who comment here that I try to respond personally to each individual comment as I feel is appropriate. Such replies are not meant to end the conversation, but to acknowledge earnest feedback as it is submitted.

And in order to better preserve the spirit and pure intentions for which this blog was established, I also hereby request that anyone not commenting with a regular user name (particularly those whose comments appear under the "Unknown" or "Anonymous" monikers, give the rest of us a name to work with in addressing any replies. If such individuals do not wish to disclose their actual given names, a pseudonym or nickname would suffice.

Any comments made by individuals who opt to not give a name by which they can ber identified may, depending on the substance and tone of such comments, be subject to deletion as well. I would respectfully ask that all of us do all we can to keep the dialogue positive, polite, and without malice or ill-will. May the Lord bless us all in our discussion of these important matters.