Hello again, everyone! As some of you are no doubt aware. several temples of the Church around the world have had caeterias in operation for their patrons and workers to obtain good food as they worship and work in the temple. But one of the top initial temple updates on the renovation process for the Salt Lake Temple, as reported in March of this year, was a decision to close the cafetera in that temple and repurpose it for temple worship spaces.
Today, a second major temple development announced by the Church was that, effective in early 2022, all temple cafeterias will pernmanently close. The two exceptions are for the Guayaquil Ecuador and Hamilton New Zealand Temples, where a longer transitionary period will be required. The announcement also noted that the Church has already closed some temple cafeterias due to COVID-19, and that those will not reopen. This move comes as the result of the Church continuing its' steady efforts to reduce and simplify the day-to-day operations of the Church on a global scale.
But more than that, based on the fact that a major focus of President Nelson's prophetic priorities for the Church is to determine what is most needful for the members thereof, and how the Church can focus on whar really matters (the work for the living and the dead that is performed in temples). This also opens up the prospect that for the temples that had operated cafeterias, current or future renovations could repurpose those spaces for temple worship.
Makes perfect sense to me. While I wouldn't have traded my experiences as a worker in the Mount Timpanogos Utah Temple (which included regular stops at the cafeteria and numerous memories in the early 2010s when I met my wife in that temple and we had numerous opportunities to eat together while we served together, I can understand the reasoning behind these decisions.
And in the future, if the Church no longer is needing to plan to include temple cafeterias in some of the larger temples, that would create more space for temple worship to occur.rega I am grateful for this inspired directive and testify that it was the result of revelation to those 15 men I gratefully sustain as prophets, seers, and revelators.ark
I will be back tomorrow with another new post, honoring Elder Dieter F. Uchtdorf, who will then be celebrating his 81st birthday. The following Saturday, Elder Dale G. Renlund will mark his 69th birthday, and the day after that will mark the last 2021 update I will share regarding apostolic age and tenure milestones.
So that does it for now. Any and all comments are, as always, welcome and appreciated, on any post at any time, as long as such comments are made in accordance with the established guidelines. Thank you for the privilege of your time. If you enjoyed what you read here and would like to stay informed of newly added content, please feel free to subscribe. Until my next post, I wish each one of you all the best and pray that the Lord will bless you all in everything you do.
No comments:
Post a Comment
In addition to my life-long love for the subjects which I cover in the posts of this blog, I have long held the belief that we can disagree without becoming disagreeable. Differences of opinion are natural, while being disagreeable in expressing those differences is not. And in that sense, I have no desire to close the door on anyone who earnestly desires to contribute to the ongoing dialogue on subjects covered in the posts on this blog.
At the same time, however, I recognize that we live in a time when incivility, discourtesy, unkindness, and even cyber-bullying has regrettably become part of online interactions. With that in mind, while anyone who wishes can comment on anything if they choose to do so, I hereby reserve the right to immediately delete any comments which are critical, unkind, lack civility, or promote prodcuts, services, and values contrary to either the Church, or to the rules of online etiquette.
I'd also like to remind all who comment here that I try to respond personally to each individual comment as I feel is appropriate. Such replies are not meant to end the conversation, but to acknowledge earnest feedback as it is submitted.
And in order to better preserve the spirit and pure intentions for which this blog was established, I also hereby request that anyone not commenting with a regular user name (particularly those whose comments appear under the "Unknown" or "Anonymous" monikers, give the rest of us a name to work with in addressing any replies. If such individuals do not wish to disclose their actual given names, a pseudonym or nickname would suffice.
Any comments made by individuals who opt to not give a name by which they can ber identified may, depending on the substance and tone of such comments, be subject to deletion as well. I would respectfully ask that all of us do all we can to keep the dialogue positive, polite, and without malice or ill-will. May the Lord bless us all in our discussion of these important matters.