Stokes Sounds Off: Major revamp and priority changes to list of temples that may be announced soon

Search This Blog

Friday, August 12, 2016

Major revamp and priority changes to list of temples that may be announced soon

I haven't been satisfied with my list of temples that may be announced soon. So I took a long look at my list and reordered some things. I now have the list split into three categories: Temples that may be announced soon (35); alternate locations (2); and dark horse candidates (13), for a grand total of 50. Let me know what you think of this new list. Here it is:

Temple Predictions:
3+ temples announced in any of the following cities and states:
1.      Managua Nicaragua: Proposed in 2012 by Elder Russell M. Nelson; land has already been purchased for it and an announcement is imminent there when membership warrants it. Please also note that it is the #1 city in terms of church presence that does not have a temple in some phase.
2.      Port Moresby Papua New Guinea: Land has been purchased for it and an announcement is imminent there when membership warrants it. Please also note that it is the #2 city in terms of church presence that doesn’t have a temple in some phase.
3.      Bentonville Arkansas: Land has been purchased for it and an announcement is imminent there when membership warrants it; please also note it is the strongest contender for a temple in the United States. I favor this location because a good friend served his mission there.
4.      2nd Southwest Salt Lake Valley Utah: Proposed in 2005 by Gordon B. Hinckley; more than likely because land has already been purchased for it.
5.      San Juan Puerto Rico: Please note that this is the #3 world city in terms of church presence that doesn’t have a temple in some phase.
6.      Tarawa Kiribati: Please note that this is the #5 world city in terms of Church presence that doesn’t have a temple in some phase.
7.      Freetown Sierra Leone: Please note that this is the #6 world city in terms of Church presence that doesn’t have a temple in some phase. May be needed due to extensive growth in Africa
8.      Kampala Uganda: Please note that this is the #7 world city in terms of Church presence that doesn’t have a temple in some phase. May be needed due to extensive growth in Africa.
9.      Nairobi Kenya: Publicly proposed by President Gordon B. Hinckley in 1999; please note that this is the #10 world city in terms of Church presence that does not have a temple in any phase. May be needed due to extensive growth in Africa.
10.  Phnom Penh Cambodia: Please note that this is the #9 world city in terms of Church presence that doesn’t have a temple in any phase; I favor this location because my brother-in-law served a mission there.
11.  Missoula Montana: Publicly proposed in 2016 by Elder David A. Bednar.
12.  Lehi Utah: I favor this location because it is my wife's hometown.
13.  Layton Utah
14.  Budapest Hungary
15.  Pocatello Idaho
16.  Auckland New Zealand
17.  La Paz Bolivia: I favor this location because my favorite bishop and good friend served a mission there.
18.  Rapid City South Dakota: I favor this location because my dad served his mission there. 
19.  Richmond Virginia
20. Lagos Nigeria (may be needed due to extensive Church growth in Africa)
21.  Tacoma Washington
22.  El Paso Texas
23.  Ulaanbaatar Mongolia: I favor this location because a good friend served his mission there.
24.  Barcelona Spain
25.  Puebla Mexico
26.  Valparaiso Chile
27.  Davao Philippines
28.  Maracaibo Venezuela: Publicly proposed in 1999 by Gordon B. Hinckley.
29.  Singapore: Publicly proposed in 2000 by Gordon B. Hinckley/
30.  Edinburgh Scotland
31.  Cody Wyoming
32.  Jacksonville/Miami Florida
33.  Brasilia/Belo Horizonte Brazil
34.  Ghana (Kumasi).
35.  Neuquen Argentina

Alternative locations:
1.      Ivory Coast (2nd and possibly 3rd temples; may be needed due to extreme growth in the area)
2.      Kasai or other DR Congo region (Kasai proposed in 2016 by Neil L. Andersen; may be needed due to extreme growth in the area);

Dark horse candidates:
1.      Vilnius Lithuania (proposed in 1993 by M. Russell Ballard)
2.      Ipswich Australia
3.      Farbanks/Juneau Alaska
4.      Kaysville Utah
5.      Sandy Utah
6.      Orem Utah (I favor this location because it's where I'm living now, and when I worked at the Mount Timpanogos Temple for six years, a majority of my colleagues were from Orem, so the LDS presence is strong here.)
7.      Heber Utah
8.      Pago Pago American Samoa: Please note that this is the #9 world city in terms of Church presence that does not have a temple in any phase.
9.  Maputo Mozambique
10.  Oslo Norway
11.  Antananarivo Madagascar
      12.  Neuquen Argentina
      13. Jakarta Indonesia (I favor this location because a good friend served his mission there.)

6 comments:

  1. I think Henderson is out because the Las Vegas temple is practically in the City of Henderson, and it's also not overwhelmed.

    Chandler AZ is definitely out, as the Gilbert temple is less than 10 minutes away, and the Mesa temple is 20 minutes away. Both existing temples in the East Valley area have huge capacity, and are underused. I was present at the dedication of the Phoenix temple in 2014, and Elder Richards said that with the eventual completion of the temple in Tucson, Arizona's temple needs would be served for a long time. Should there be another temple in the Phoenix area, my money is on a second temple in Mesa near the intersection of Val Vista and McKellips. The Church owns a big area of land, including two neighboring ward houses, a ball field, and a sizable orange grove. That area is also the epicenter of Mesa Mormons, and has easy access to a freeway (much easier than the current Mesa temple). This is probably wishful thinking on my part, because the Mesa temple is currently severely underused. There's also a possibility of a temple in the San Tan Valley, as membership is growing and the Gilbert temple is 20-45 minutes away from the centers of population... but the number of stakes will have to triple (which isn't impossible in the next 20 years) before that will happen.

    I'd love to see a temple in Port Morseby! Bentonville would be great as well -- those Walmart employees are loyal, pay large amounts of tithing, and have to travel 3 hours currently. And of course, more temples in Africa would be a wonderful blessing for the Saints there. The future growth of the Church will be in Africa, and it would be great to get ahead of the curve!

    ReplyDelete
  2. Thanks for your thoughts. I wasn't aware of the Las Vegas temple being in Henderson. I was also not aware of Elder Richards' statement about Arizona. Guess I will remove those from the list then.

    As for Port Moresby and Bentonville, my inside information from Rick Satterfield (Port Moresby) and my former TL at work (Bentonville) land has been purchased for temples there, and it is only a matter of time before those temples happen. I won't be surprised if these temples are announced, along with others, in October, nor will I be surprised if no new temples are announced.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. As far as Africa, these nations mentioned are among the most populous LDS cities in terms of Church presence without a temple. So if any new temples are announced this go-round, those seem like the most likely possibilities.

      Delete
    2. I deleted the Henderson and Chandler temples and added a temple for Lagos, Nigeria in the main list and Jakarta Indonesia as a dark horse candidate. THoughts?

      Delete
    3. This comment has been removed by the author.

      Delete
  3. I definitely think Lagos could have a shot in the next few years! Membership is growing like crazy, it's a major city with lots of transportation links, and it's just a matter of time.

    Jakarta sounds interesting... but I'd put my money on Singapore first, as it's a much bigger transportation hub. It's also a more developed country, and I am sure that temple presidents, temple missionaries, and visiting members of the Temple Department would rather be able to drink the water and avoid the violence Jakarta is infamous for having. Singapore is not that far from Jakarta, and is much closer to (non-Muslim) centers of growth in Malaysia. Still, in 20 years Jakarta would be a great candidate for a temple!

    ReplyDelete

In addition to my life-long love for the subjects which I cover in the posts of this blog, I have long held the belief that we can disagree without becoming disagreeable. Differences of opinion are natural, while being disagreeable in expressing those differences is not. And in that sense, I have no desire to close the door on anyone who earnestly desires to contribute to the ongoing dialogue on subjects covered in the posts on this blog.

At the same time, however, I recognize that we live in a time when incivility, discourtesy, unkindness, and even cyber-bullying has regrettably become part of online interactions. With that in mind, while anyone who wishes can comment on anything if they choose to do so, I hereby reserve the right to immediately delete any comments which are critical, unkind, lack civility, or promote prodcuts, services, and values contrary to either the Church, or to the rules of online etiquette.

I'd also like to remind all who comment here that I try to respond personally to each individual comment as I feel is appropriate. Such replies are not meant to end the conversation, but to acknowledge earnest feedback as it is submitted.

And in order to better preserve the spirit and pure intentions for which this blog was established, I also hereby request that anyone not commenting with a regular user name (particularly those whose comments appear under the "Unknown" or "Anonymous" monikers, give the rest of us a name to work with in addressing any replies. If such individuals do not wish to disclose their actual given names, a pseudonym or nickname would suffice.

Any comments made by individuals who opt to not give a name by which they can ber identified may, depending on the substance and tone of such comments, be subject to deletion as well. I would respectfully ask that all of us do all we can to keep the dialogue positive, polite, and without malice or ill-will. May the Lord bless us all in our discussion of these important matters.