I could also see presidents being called for as many as 12 other operating temples. There are three others which will probably be dedicated in the early months of next year that might also have their first presidents announced soon. As I observed from my own six-year service as a temple worker, temple presidents generally usually serve for three years or so. So in that regard, there is one temple whose president has been serving for around 5 years, which is a comparatively longer period of time than temple presidents usually serve.
And there are other temples that have had presidents in place for several years as well, but in those cases, their active service time was interrupted at some point by a renovation. I was elated to find that the new president of the Mount Timpanogos Temple has been a counselor in the temple presidency for several years, and also happened to be someone I knew personally who had been in my parents' ward. He is a very good man whom I respect a lot. That was great to learn about. It made my day. I enjoy following the calling of new presidents, and I hope that some of you will find this list of mine to be informative and interesting. If any of you have any feedback, please let me know.
Here is that list of new presidents:
Operating Temples whose president was changed earlier
this year:
1.
Calgary Alberta (president changed sometime
during March for an undisclosed reason, likely because the previous president
died or became incapacitated)
General Note #1: The president of the Tokyo Japan Temple
died during his active service in late April of this year. The Church will no
doubt be calling one of his counselors as the new president within the next few
days to ensure that the work of the temple presidency can move forward uninterrupted.
New Temples whose presidents will begin serving later
this year:
1.
Paris France (President announced in 2016; will
begin formal service on May 21)
2.
Cedar City Utah (President announced in March; will begin service on
December 10)
3.
Tucson Arizona (President announced in March;
will begin formal service on August 13)
4.
Meridian Idaho (President announced in April;
will begin formal service in November 19)
General Note #2: The presidents of the Freiberg Germany
Temple (closed for renovation in 2014 and rededicated last year) and Idaho
Falls Idaho Temple (closed for renovation in 2015 and scheduled for
rededication in June of this year) started serving in 2014, months before their
closures. If not for that, both would be marking the completion of their third
years of active service later this year. As it is, they only actively served
for a few months maximum. Therefore, it is possible that the Church may retain
him for a couple more years. I could see them calling a new president, but it
doesn’t seem probable.
General Note #3: Other operating temples, as has already
been announced, will be getting a new president later this year as well, and if
those changes take place as they did during my six-year service in the Mount
Timpanogos Utah Temple, the new presidents will start their service on the
first Monday or Tuesday of November, which fall this year on the 6th
and 7th. Those temples that will have a new president this year
include the following:
1.
Apia Samoa
2.
Logan Utah
3.
Vernal Utah
4.
Toronto Ontario
5.
Snowflake Arizona
6.
Phoenix Arizona
7.
Salt Lake
8.
Bern Switzerland
9.
Quetzaltenango Guatemala
10. Louisville
Kentucky
11. San
Diego California
12. Mount
Timpanogos Utah
13. Madrid
Spain
14. Bogota
Colombia
15. Edmonton
Alberta
16. Newport
Beach California
17. Adelaide
Australia
18. Kona
Hawaii
19. Caracas
Venezuela
20. Bismarck
North Dakota
21. Mesa
Arizona
22. Columbia
South Carolina
23. Ogden
Utah
Temple presidents generally serve for around three years.
With that in mind, I feel confident in predicti.ng that the following temples
may also have a new president announced:
1.
Asuncion Paraguay
NOTE: The current president has
served since 2014, which means that this year would mark time for a charge. But
this temple will close for renovation in October, one month before usual
changes are made. As a subsequent rededication of this temple is anticipated
sometime in 2019, it is more than likely that the Church will hold off on
naming a new president until that time.
2.
Baton Rouge Louisiana
3.
Buenos Aires Argentina
4.
NOTE: The current president has been serving
since this temple’s rededication in 2012. As that is well beyond the standard 3
years of service, it seems reasonable to assume that there will be such a
change this year.
5.
Fort Lauderdale Florida
6.
Guayaquil Ecuador
7.
Los Angeles California
8.
Lubbock Texas
9.
Manila Philippines
10. Oakland
California
11. San
Salvador El Salvador
12. Washington
DC
NOTE: Though this temple
president will have marked three years of service later this year, the temple
will close for renovation next March. With that in mind, I could see the Church
calling a new president this year for a few months prior to that renovation, or
holding off on calling anyone until after the renovation is completed sometime
during 2020.
Temples that will most likely be dedicated during the
early or middle part of next year and might therefore have their first presidents
announced at some point during the fall of this year (since the first president
of the Paris France Temple had its’ first: president called during summer
2016):
1.
Rome Italy
2.
Kinshasa DR Congo
3.
Barranquilla Colombia
ADDITIONAL NOTES: The current president of the Jordan River Utah
Temple has been serving in that capacity since 2014, which would have made his
release possible this year, but as it has been undergoing renovations since
2016, he has had less than two years of active service. It is therefore highly
probable that he will retain his presidency until sometime during 2020, which
would be two years of additional active service following the rededication, for
the total standard service period of three years. The current president of the
Frankfurt Germany temple has a slightly different but similar situation, as he
started serving in 2013, and had roughly two years of active service prior to
that temple’s renovation closure in 2015. We could therefore see a change in
that temple presidency sometime within the next two years or so. Time will
tell. In both cases, the Church might always decide to make those changes
sooner, but that seems unlikely. As far as I have been able to ascertain, every
other temple president whose active service has been interrupted by a temple
renovation has subsequently gone on to fill the remainder of his three-year
term.
No comments:
Post a Comment
In addition to my life-long love for the subjects which I cover in the posts of this blog, I have long held the belief that we can disagree without becoming disagreeable. Differences of opinion are natural, while being disagreeable in expressing those differences is not. And in that sense, I have no desire to close the door on anyone who earnestly desires to contribute to the ongoing dialogue on subjects covered in the posts on this blog.
At the same time, however, I recognize that we live in a time when incivility, discourtesy, unkindness, and even cyber-bullying has regrettably become part of online interactions. With that in mind, while anyone who wishes can comment on anything if they choose to do so, I hereby reserve the right to immediately delete any comments which are critical, unkind, lack civility, or promote prodcuts, services, and values contrary to either the Church, or to the rules of online etiquette.
I'd also like to remind all who comment here that I try to respond personally to each individual comment as I feel is appropriate. Such replies are not meant to end the conversation, but to acknowledge earnest feedback as it is submitted.
And in order to better preserve the spirit and pure intentions for which this blog was established, I also hereby request that anyone not commenting with a regular user name (particularly those whose comments appear under the "Unknown" or "Anonymous" monikers, give the rest of us a name to work with in addressing any replies. If such individuals do not wish to disclose their actual given names, a pseudonym or nickname would suffice.
Any comments made by individuals who opt to not give a name by which they can ber identified may, depending on the substance and tone of such comments, be subject to deletion as well. I would respectfully ask that all of us do all we can to keep the dialogue positive, polite, and without malice or ill-will. May the Lord bless us all in our discussion of these important matters.