For this update, I will first post my updated list of the changes that have happened or might yet happen, and follow up that posted list with my analysis of that. Here's the list.
Operating Temples whose president was changed earlier
this year:
1.
Calgary Alberta (president changed sometime
during March for an undisclosed reason, likely because the previous president
died or became incapacitated)
General Note #1: The president of the Tokyo Japan Temple
died during his active service in late April of this year. The Church will no
doubt be calling one of his counselors as the new president within the next few
days to ensure that the work of the temple presidency can move forward uninterrupted.
New Temples whose presidents will begin serving later
this year:
1.
Paris France (President announced in 2016; will
begin formal service on May 21)
2.
Cedar City Utah (President announced in March; will begin service on
December 10)
3.
Tucson Arizona (President announced in March;
will begin formal service on August 13)
4.
Meridian Idaho (President announced in April;
will begin formal service in November 19)
General Note #2: The presidents of the Freiberg Germany
Temple (closed for renovation in 2014 and rededicated last year) and Idaho
Falls Idaho Temple (closed for renovation in 2015 and scheduled for
rededication in June of this year) started serving in 2014, months before their
closures. If not for that, both would be marking the completion of their third
years of active service later this year. As it is, they only actively served
for a few months maximum. Therefore, it is possible that the Church may retain
him for a couple more years. I could see them calling a new president, but it
doesn’t seem probable.
General Note #3: Other operating temples, as has already
been announced, will be getting a new president later this year as well, and if
those changes take place as they did during my six-year service in the Mount
Timpanogos Utah Temple, the new presidents will start their service on the
first Monday or Tuesday of November, which fall this year on the 6th
and 7th. Those temples that will have a new president this year
include the following:
1.
Apia Samoa
2.
Logan Utah
3.
Vernal Utah
4.
Toronto Ontario
5.
Snowflake Arizona
6.
Phoenix Arizona
7.
Salt Lake
8.
Bern Switzerland
9.
Quetzaltenango Guatemala
10. Louisville
Kentucky
11. San
Diego California
12. Mount
Timpanogos Utah
13. Madrid
Spain
14. Bogota
Colombia
15. Edmonton
Alberta
16. Newport
Beach California
17. Adelaide
Australia
18. Kona
Hawaii
19. Caracas
Venezuela
20. Bismarck
North Dakota
21. Mesa
Arizona
22. Columbia
South Carolina
23. Ogden
Utah
24. Lubbock
Texas
25. Guayaquil
Ecuador
26. Fort
Lauderdale Florida
27. Los
Angeles California
Temple presidents generally serve for around three years.
With that in mind, I feel confident in predicting that the following temples
may also have a new president announced:
1.
Asuncion Paraguay
NOTE: The current president has
served since 2014, which means that this year would mark time for a charge. But
this temple will close for renovation in October, one month before usual
changes are made. As a subsequent rededication of this temple is anticipated
sometime in 2019, it is more than likely that the Church will hold off on
naming a new president until that time.
2.
Baton Rouge Louisiana
3.
Buenos Aires Argentina
NOTE: The current president has
been serving since this temple’s rededication in 2012. As that is well beyond
the standard 3 years of service, it seems reasonable to assume that there will
be such a change this year.
4.
Manila Philippines
5.
Oakland California
NOTE: Though this temple
president has served for three years this year, this temple will close for
renovation in February of next year. With that in mind, I could see the Church
calling a new president this year for a few months prior to that renovation, or
holding off on calling anyone until after the renovation is completed sometime
during 2019.
6.
San Salvador El Salvador
7.
Washington DC
NOTE: Though this temple
president will have marked three years of service later this year, the temple
will close for renovation next March. With that in mind, I could see the Church
calling a new president this year for a few months prior to that renovation, or
holding off on calling anyone until after the renovation is completed sometime
during 2020.
Temples that will most likely be dedicated during the
early or middle part of next year and might therefore have their first presidents
announced at some point during the fall of this year (since the first president
of the Paris France Temple had its’ first: president called during summer
2016):
1.
Rome Italy
2.
Kinshasa DR Congo
3.
Barranquilla Colombia
ADDITIONAL NOTES: The current president of the Jordan
River Utah Temple has been serving in that capacity since 2014, which would
have made his release possible this year, but as it has been undergoing
renovations since 2016, he has had less than two years of active service. It is
therefore highly probable that he will retain his presidency until sometime
during 2020, which would be two years of additional active service following
the rededication, for the total standard service period of three years. The
current president of the Frankfurt Germany temple has a slightly different but
similar situation, as he started serving in 2013, and had roughly two years of
active service prior to that temple’s renovation closure in 2015. We could
therefore see a change in that temple presidency sometime within the next two
years or so. Time will tell. In both cases, the Church might always decide to
make those changes sooner, but that seems unlikely. As far as I have been able
to ascertain, every other temple president whose active service has been interrupted
by a temple renovation has subsequently gone on to fill the remainder of his
three-year term.
That does it for the list. Now for the analysis: First, as noted above, in March, a new president was announced for the Calgary Alberta Temple. The previous one had only served since 2015, so that change caught me a little off guard. There are usually only two reasons a temple president is changed so abruptly: the death or incapacitation of the current president. There has also been a time or two when a temple president is disfellowshipped or excommunicated, but one of the perks of generally appointing older men to preside over temples is that they are able to devote their full energies to that calling and responsibility and are not very likely to be blown about by every wind of doctrine. So I feel safe in asserting that it was either the death or incapacitation of the previous president that lead to a change in this case.
I am anticipating that we will learn very soon about the identity of the new Tokyo Japan Temple president. The previous president died a few weeks ago. If the Church follows its usual practice in the wake of that death, they have put in one of that president's counselors as the new president. And it is not unreasonable to assume that, since that new president will only serve for about six months prior to that temple's closure in October for renovation, that the new president will be in place for 2-3 years following the rededication of that temple, which is anticipated sometime during 2020.
I have heard some rumors that the Freiberg Germany and Idaho Falls Idaho Temples could get new presidents at some point this year, but I don't think that is very likely. For Freiberg, which closed for renovation in 2014 and dedicated last year, the current president has yet to mark three years of active service. The same is true for the Idaho Falls Idaho Temple, closed for renovation in 2015, and scheduled for rededication in just under a month. It would not be unheard of for the Church to call new presidents for either or both of those temples, but it does not seem likely.
The announcement today of four new presidents brings the number of previously dedicated temples that will get a new president this year to 27. The announcement of other presidents is always possible. During my 6-year service period as a veil worker in the Mount Timpanogos Utah Temple, those changes always took place in November of the relevant year, and generally the new presidencies would begin their service on the first Monday or Tuesday of that month. If that holds true for each of these 27, that change will happen on November 6 or 7 this year. I have heard from others who have worked at other temples that it worked slightly differently for their temple presidencies, but doing it that way would ensure a smooth transition in the first full week of that month.
I have also noted through observation that the Church puts new presidents in place for roughly 1/3 of the total number of operating temples each year. Noting that, by August of next year, we could have a total of 162 operating temples, it would not be hard to believe that we could see as many as 54 temples total have new presidents announced during that year. Half of that number have been called already. So which other temples might get a new president? In the list above, I have noted seven other possibilities from those currently in operation. Of those seven, 1 (the Buenos Aires Argentina Temple) has not had a new president since its rededication in 2012, meaning that the current president will mark 5 years of service in September.
And of those same seven, three (the Asuncion Paraguay, Oakland California, and Washington DC temples) are scheduled to close for renovation within the next 10 months or less. So for those three, I could see the Church either calling a new president to service for a few months prior to those renovations, or retaining the current president until 2019 (for the first two) or 2020 (for the temple named for the US capital.)
There are also the three (Rome Italy, Kinshasa DR Congo, and Barranquilla Colombia) that might be dedicated early next year that could potential have their first presidents announced within the next 6 months or so. We might also see new presidents for the Jordan River Utah (where the current president was called in 2014, but a renovation has been taking place since 2016, so the Church might elect to retain him until 2020, which would make the standard 3 years of active service) and Frankfurt Germany Temples (where the current president started serving in 2013 and marked just under two years of active service before that temple closed for renovation in 2015, so the Church might elect to retain him for another year or two).
So there you have it. My updated list and my analysis of it. Please let me know if you have any feedback, and also if, by any chance, I have overlooked any possibilities on this list. I have tried to be as accurate as possible, but I am not infallible at all, so I welcome any corrections that point to something I neglected to consider. I believe that we could see at least 1/3 of all operating temples have a new president called this year, and I have done my best to consider all possibilities. I look forward to any and all such feedback any of you might care to offer. Thanks for your interest and support.
No comments:
Post a Comment
In addition to my life-long love for the subjects which I cover in the posts of this blog, I have long held the belief that we can disagree without becoming disagreeable. Differences of opinion are natural, while being disagreeable in expressing those differences is not. And in that sense, I have no desire to close the door on anyone who earnestly desires to contribute to the ongoing dialogue on subjects covered in the posts on this blog.
At the same time, however, I recognize that we live in a time when incivility, discourtesy, unkindness, and even cyber-bullying has regrettably become part of online interactions. With that in mind, while anyone who wishes can comment on anything if they choose to do so, I hereby reserve the right to immediately delete any comments which are critical, unkind, lack civility, or promote prodcuts, services, and values contrary to either the Church, or to the rules of online etiquette.
I'd also like to remind all who comment here that I try to respond personally to each individual comment as I feel is appropriate. Such replies are not meant to end the conversation, but to acknowledge earnest feedback as it is submitted.
And in order to better preserve the spirit and pure intentions for which this blog was established, I also hereby request that anyone not commenting with a regular user name (particularly those whose comments appear under the "Unknown" or "Anonymous" monikers, give the rest of us a name to work with in addressing any replies. If such individuals do not wish to disclose their actual given names, a pseudonym or nickname would suffice.
Any comments made by individuals who opt to not give a name by which they can ber identified may, depending on the substance and tone of such comments, be subject to deletion as well. I would respectfully ask that all of us do all we can to keep the dialogue positive, polite, and without malice or ill-will. May the Lord bless us all in our discussion of these important matters.