I am also trying to study developments in terms of likely temples and future temple-related developments. I know I have been promising to post my updated estimated timeline for those future events, but I am trying to make the current version the most researched one that I have ever done.
In terms of these predictions for the October Conference, I know for sure that my research in recent days has led me to reconsider some of the temples I have listed. I am leaving the list untouched for now because I want to ensure that there is adequate time for feedback on what you, my readers, feel are more or less likely possibilities. As with anything, I try to take such insights into account when fine-tuning things. And if there are any comments any of you have on any of these other predictions, please share that as well. I look forward to the discussion.
I would also be interested to hear anyone who has thoughts as far as what the update regarding President Monson might mean in terms of whether or not he will speak in future General Conferences. While a prophet not speaking as much, if at all, is not uncommon, it is unclear whether or not his decision means he will not attend future General Conferences. It is also not clear how much longer he might live. It is almost certain he will live to see his 90th birthday in less than three months (though unclear whether or not the Church will do anything special to mark this milestone birthday), he would reach some other milestones regarding his tenure as prophet and his age, to say nothing of his First Presidency moving up on the list of the five longest continuously serving ones, so much is unknown about how his decision will impact things like his speaking in General Conference.
And, in one way, this situation is unprecedented. President Monson voluntarily stepped back from active service, unlike Presidents Kimball and Benson, who were older and had no choice. It is certain that, if he does speak at all in subsequent conferences, his addresses will continue to be 10 minutes or less total in length, and will be given at the top of those sessions. But I could see him stepping back from even that and letting his counselors and the other 12 apostles speak a bit longer instead.
Additionally, I should note that, because I wanted to see what it might look like, I have put together a hypothetical prediction for the April 2018 General Conference. But since that will be largely determined by what happens between now and then, and specifically during the October General Conference, I am not posting that now nor will I until I see how October pans out.
As always, I look forward to the discussion. Here are those predictions:
October 2017 General Conference Predictions
Speaking Order (Text in brackets indicated what actually
happened.)
Session
|
Conducting
|
Speaker
|
General Women’s
|
Joy D. Jones
|
Christina B. Franco
|
Sharon Eubank
|
||
Bonnie L. Oscarson
|
||
President Dieter F. Uchtdorf
|
||
Saturday Morning
|
President Henry B. Eyring
|
President Dieter F. Uchtdorf
|
Bishop W. Christopher Waddell
|
||
Jean B. Bingham
|
||
Elder David A. Bednar
|
||
Elder Massimo De Feo
|
||
Elder O. Vincent Haleck
|
||
Elder Jeffrey R. Holland
|
||
Saturday Afternoon
|
President Dieter F. Uchtdorf
|
President Henry B. Eyring
(Sustaining of Church Officers)
|
President Russell M. Nelson
|
||
Elder Dale G. Renlund
|
||
Elder Larry Y. Wilson
|
||
Elder Joni L. Koch
|
||
Elder Ian S. Ardern
|
||
Elder Quentin L. Cook
|
||
Elder Ronald A. Rasband
|
||
Saturday Priesthood
|
President Henry B. Eyring
|
President Thomas S. Monson
|
Elder D. Todd Christofferson
|
||
Elder Patrick Kearon
|
||
President Dieter F. Uchtdorf
|
||
President Henry B. Eyring
|
||
Sunday Morning
|
President Dieter F. Uchtdorf
|
President Thomas S. Monson
|
Elder Robert D. Hales
|
||
Elder Juan A. Uceda
|
||
Neill F. Marriott
|
||
Elder Gary E. Stevenson
|
||
Elder Adilson de Paula Parrella
|
||
Elder Brian K. Taylor
|
||
President Henry B. Eyring
|
||
Sunday Afternoon
|
President Henry B. Eyring
|
Elder Neil L. Andersen
|
Tad R. Callister
|
||
Elder David F. Evans
|
||
Elder M. Russell Ballard
|
||
Elder Taniela B. Wakolo
|
||
Elder Jose L. Alonso
|
||
Elder Dallin H. Oaks
|
Changes in General Church Leadership
Presidency of the Seventy: Elders Donald L. Hallstrom
and Richard J. Maynes released from the presidency, Elders Juan A. Uceda and
Patrick Kearon sustained.
NOTE: These changes, announced on May 3, became
effective on August 1. For that reason, they will likely be ratified by
sustaining vote.
|
General Authority Seventies: Elders Stanley G. Ellis,
Larry R. Lawrence, and W. Craig Zwick released as General Authority Seventies
and granted emeritus status.
NOTE: Elder Ellis turned 70 in January this year, just
as Elder Zwick did in June, and Elder Lawrence did in August, so it would
make sense if these men were released and granted emeritus status.
RESULT:
|
Area Seventies: Releases and sustainings.
NOTE: It has been customary for most changes in area
seventies to take place in April, when President Uchtdorf leads out in the
sustaining vote, and for only a few to take place in October, when President
Eyring leads out in the sustaining. Since we are talking about an October
General Conference, it would make sense if only a few changes happened this
go-round.
RESULT:
|
Temple Predictions:
3+ temples announced in any of
the following locations:
NOTE: Since it is difficult at
best to know where the Lord feels a need for a temple and temple locations are
not as cut-and-dried as I have originally believed them to be, I am doing a
preliminary list, which I will refine as the time for General Conference draws
closer. I will look forward to seeing what happens with those possibilities, if
any are announced at all. So far between 2015 and this year, the 12 newest temples
were announced during the April General Conference. If any temples are
announced, there will only be a few.
ADDITIONAL NOTE: As with the
previous conference, these temples are grouped first by geographical area of
the Church, then by likelihood within that area:
Africa West: Lagos Nigeria
Asia: Phnom Penh Cambodia;
Jakarta Indonesia
Brazil: Belo Horizonte;
Salvador
Central America: Managua
Nicaragua NOTE: This temple was publicly proposed by then-Elder Russell M.
Nelson in 2012, and land for this temple was reportedly purchased several years
ago. An official announcement will follow when membership and temple activity
in the area this temple district will cover warrant that. Nicaragua is also the
first of the top ten countries without a temple in any phase.
Europe: Budapest Hungary;
Vienna Austria
Mexico: Puebla Mexico
North America Central: Missoula
Montana; (NOTE: Land for this temple was purchased several years ago, and it
will be announced when membership and temple activity in the area this temple
district will cover warrant that.); Green Bay Wisconsin
North America Northeast:
Richmond Virginia
North America Northwest: Salem
Oregon
North America Southeast:
Bentonville Arkansas NOTE: Land for this temple was purchased several years ago,
and both will be announced when membership and temple activity in the area
these temple district will cover warrant that.
North America Southwest: Fort
Worth Texas
Pacific: Auckland New Zealand;
Port Moresby Papua New Guinea NOTE: Land for both of these temples was purchased
several years ago, and will be announced when membership and temple activity in
the area this temple district will cover warrant that. Of the two, Auckland is
more likely, but Papua New Guinea is the second of the top ten countries
without a temple in any phase.
South America Northwest: Santa
Cruz Bolivia
South America South: Neuquen
Argentina; Valparaiso Chile
Utah North: Layton Utah
Utah Salt Lake City: Tooele
Utah
ADDITIONAL TEMPLE NOTES: As growth has stagnated in the US, it is unclear how many (if any) additional US temples might be announced. I would not be opposed to removing all but the ones that are most likely. And in terms of a temple for Austria, it makes sense in terms of President Monson's goal to have every member within 200 miles of a temple, but it is not likely because Austria is retrogressing rather than progressing in the gospel. So that would be an easy removal as well. Other than those, any one of them is fair game to happen or to be removed as a possibility. And if I have omitted or overlooked any possibilities, let me know that too. Maybe no temples will be announced this go-round at all, which would be in line with the fact that the last 12 temples were announced during April General Conference. But I am still including them just in case. Thanks.
ADDITIONAL TEMPLE NOTES: As growth has stagnated in the US, it is unclear how many (if any) additional US temples might be announced. I would not be opposed to removing all but the ones that are most likely. And in terms of a temple for Austria, it makes sense in terms of President Monson's goal to have every member within 200 miles of a temple, but it is not likely because Austria is retrogressing rather than progressing in the gospel. So that would be an easy removal as well. Other than those, any one of them is fair game to happen or to be removed as a possibility. And if I have omitted or overlooked any possibilities, let me know that too. Maybe no temples will be announced this go-round at all, which would be in line with the fact that the last 12 temples were announced during April General Conference. But I am still including them just in case. Thanks.
No comments:
Post a Comment
In addition to my life-long love for the subjects which I cover in the posts of this blog, I have long held the belief that we can disagree without becoming disagreeable. Differences of opinion are natural, while being disagreeable in expressing those differences is not. And in that sense, I have no desire to close the door on anyone who earnestly desires to contribute to the ongoing dialogue on subjects covered in the posts on this blog.
At the same time, however, I recognize that we live in a time when incivility, discourtesy, unkindness, and even cyber-bullying has regrettably become part of online interactions. With that in mind, while anyone who wishes can comment on anything if they choose to do so, I hereby reserve the right to immediately delete any comments which are critical, unkind, lack civility, or promote prodcuts, services, and values contrary to either the Church, or to the rules of online etiquette.
I'd also like to remind all who comment here that I try to respond personally to each individual comment as I feel is appropriate. Such replies are not meant to end the conversation, but to acknowledge earnest feedback as it is submitted.
And in order to better preserve the spirit and pure intentions for which this blog was established, I also hereby request that anyone not commenting with a regular user name (particularly those whose comments appear under the "Unknown" or "Anonymous" monikers, give the rest of us a name to work with in addressing any replies. If such individuals do not wish to disclose their actual given names, a pseudonym or nickname would suffice.
Any comments made by individuals who opt to not give a name by which they can ber identified may, depending on the substance and tone of such comments, be subject to deletion as well. I would respectfully ask that all of us do all we can to keep the dialogue positive, polite, and without malice or ill-will. May the Lord bless us all in our discussion of these important matters.