Stokes Sounds Off: BREAKING NEWS: Church Releases Official Statement on Alleged Abuse Accusations Against a Former Mission President

Search This Blog

Leaderboard

Tuesday, March 20, 2018

BREAKING NEWS: Church Releases Official Statement on Alleged Abuse Accusations Against a Former Mission President

Hello again, everyone! I wanted to post now with some breaking news from the Church. In response to a request for comment about an ongoing police investigation of charges that a former MTC president may have abused one of the missionaries under his stewardship, the First Presidency has released this statement.

What impressed me as I read it was how balanced it was, making it clear that abuse of any kind by anyone is cause for immediate disciplinary action if the allegations are subsequently verified, but also making it clear that since the recollection of the two people involved (the accuser and the accused) differ so much, and since the police continue to investigate, there is not much Church leadership can do unless and until this is settled one way or the other.

And I for one appreciate the balance. While this may not be true in other nations, in the US, someone is believed innocent until proven guilty. So for that reason, until the allegations are verified as true or false, the situation needs to be in the hands of the law enforcement members involved in the investigation, and if and when the claims are verified as factual, the Church would, of course, take the necessary action on their part.

This measured response from the First Presidency shows clearly how much they intend to keep the balance between the love of the Lord and the law of the Lord, as they mentioned in the press conference on January 16. In my opinion, this is the best approach they could have taken to responding about this issue.

If and when more details are determined about the case, subsequent releases will follow, I am sure. In the meantime, for any of my readers who may have been or are currently being subjected to abuse of any kind, I wanted to post some links to official Church resources on that subject.

You can find resources on that subject, among others, from the Church's page on that subject from the gospel topics section, from Mormon Newsroom's additional resource page covering the subject, and these General Conference talks as well.

Perhaps my all-time favorite among those is the most recent one, given in April 2008 by Elder Richard G. Scott, who, as some of you might recall, committed his talks to memory so he could focus on making sure he was always looking right into whatever camera was covering him. And since the Church has released this statement today, perhaps another talk or two from this next General Conference may be added to that list.

That does it for this post. Any and all comments are, as always, welcome and appreciated. Thank you for the privilege of your time. Until my next post, I wish each one of you all the best and pray that the Lord will bless you all in everything you do.

3 comments:

  1. After additional information was disclosed to Church leaders by police investigating the matter, the Church published an addendum to the statement cited above, reiterating the Church's "no tolerance" policy in matters of abuse and confirming that they will take the next necessary steps on this issue. Just wanted to note this update. Thanks

    ReplyDelete
  2. Unfortunate that a priesthood leader in this position was that weak. Bad stuff can happen everywhere, but it is worse when a church official messes up to this degree.
    Ed Pinegar was my MTC President in 1989. His influence on us was infectious and positive. He would come on the intercom about once per day, and his bubbly happy attitude and words inpired and lifted us constantly. I can't imagine him or any other such figure being like this guy in 1984. Glad those that worked with him are probably gone or dead, but then again a few general authorities now living may have known him then.
    I hope the victim does bot sue the Church for this guy's gross stupidity.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Funny you should mention Ed Pinegar, Eduardo. At one point (if memory serves and if he is the same man), he was one of many sealers at the Mount Timpanogos Temple with whom I worked during my six years there. If he is the same Ed Pinegar, then I too can attest to his goodness.

    That said, I share your disgust about the conduct of this former MTC President, and your concern for those who were victimized and likewise hope the Church won't face trouble over this. Of the two incidents in question, my local news noted that the statute of limitations had expired on the first, so legally only the second could be prosecuted. But I am comforted to know there are no such limitations in Church disciplinary practices. It is tragic when we hear of cases such as this when trusted leaders use their positions of authority in a way that constitutes unrighteous dominion. The Lord and our leaders have clearly stated how they feel about such issues, and even if this man escapes justice in this life, he cannot do so hereafter.

    That is why I so appreciated the measured, impartial response the Church first provided, followed by stronger wording once more was known. That was the best way to handle this, in my opinion. Thanks for your comment, Eduardo.

    ReplyDelete

In addition to my life-long love for the subjects which I cover in the posts of this blog, I have long held the belief that we can disagree without becoming disagreeable. Differences of opinion are natural, while being disagreeable in expressing those differences is not. And in that sense, I have no desire to close the door on anyone who earnestly desires to contribute to the ongoing dialogue on subjects covered in the posts on this blog.

At the same time, however, I recognize that we live in a time when incivility, discourtesy, unkindness, and even cyber-bullying has regrettably become part of online interactions. With that in mind, while anyone who wishes can comment on anything if they choose to do so, I hereby reserve the right to immediately delete any comments which are critical, unkind, lack civility, or promote prodcuts, services, and values contrary to either the Church, or to the rules of online etiquette.

I'd also like to remind all who comment here that I try to respond personally to each individual comment as I feel is appropriate. Such replies are not meant to end the conversation, but to acknowledge earnest feedback as it is submitted.

And in order to better preserve the spirit and pure intentions for which this blog was established, I also hereby request that anyone not commenting with a regular user name (particularly those whose comments appear under the "Unknown" or "Anonymous" monikers, give the rest of us a name to work with in addressing any replies. If such individuals do not wish to disclose their actual given names, a pseudonym or nickname would suffice.

Any comments made by individuals who opt to not give a name by which they can ber identified may, depending on the substance and tone of such comments, be subject to deletion as well. I would respectfully ask that all of us do all we can to keep the dialogue positive, polite, and without malice or ill-will. May the Lord bless us all in our discussion of these important matters.