Stokes Sounds Off: BREAKING TEMPLE NEWS: Tokyo Japan Temple Annex Dedicated Last Month

Search This Blog

Top Leaderboard

Wednesday, February 3, 2021

BREAKING TEMPLE NEWS: Tokyo Japan Temple Annex Dedicated Last Month

Hello again, everyone! Based on the newest information for the Tokyo Japan Temple, I did some additional digging on my end. I found an article from the Japan Newsroom, dated January 27, which that the new annex for the Tokyo Japan Temple was dedicated 2.5 weeks earlier, on Sunday January 10. Elder Takashi Wada, the Asia North Area president, presided at that event, accompanied by both of his counselors, Elders James R. Rasband and John A. McCune.

Although only the apostles have the doctrinal authority to preside at and officiate in the dedication or rededication of any completed temple, as assigned to do so by the First Presidency and/or Quorum of the Twelve Apostles, area presidencies, other General Authority Seventies, area seventies, local congregational leaders, or (in the early days of the Church) temple building missionaries, have been able to preside at temple groundbreakings, the dedication of chapels, etc.

The reasoning behind dedicating the annex last month when the full rededication of the temple proper may not occur for at least 8 months was because parts of that annex will be used by local congregations for Sunday worship, and will also be used as office and meeting spaces for the president of the Tokyo Japan stake and some of the bishops serving in the same stake. and the headquarters offices for the Japan Tokyo Mission and the Asia North Area.

It was also noted that Elder McCune conducted the dedicatory services, with remarks being offered by Elders Rasband and Wada, and a video message of congratulations featuring Elder Gerrit W. Gong of the Quorum of the Twelve Apostles was also shown. Throughout the dedicatory services, it was frequently emphasized that the dedication of the annex would be a stepping stone to the eventual anticipated open house and rededication of the temple in its' entirety.

I would just add a few other observations here: Prior to the onset of COVID-19, the Church had originally planned to wrap up the renovation of the Tokyo Japan Temple and rededicate it last year in advance of the commencement of the 2020 Summer Olympics in mid-July. Conditions related to the global pandemic, along the decision to add the annex to the project, which had not been part of the original plan, delayed that process.

Given the information I have previously shared (indicating that the fall months in the Northern hemisphere are likely the soonest that any temple dedications or rededications may be held this year), the potential timing for any such events may be difficult to determine. That being said, there are parts of Asia and the Pacific, among other regions, that have kept the impact of COVID-19 to a relative minimum.

So whenever temple dedications and rededications do resume, I'd anticipate the Tokyo temple to be one of the first (but likely not the very first) to have an open house and (in Tokyo's case) a rededication. The second thing I wanted to mention is that both Elders Gary E. Stevenson and Gerrit W. Gong have connections to the Asian continent, with Elder Stevenson having served as a member of the Asia North Area Presidency for a few years prior to his call as the Presiding Bishop, which in turn preceded his call as an apostle.

Given the fact that both apostles have connections to Asia, it might be easy to surmise that either of the two apostles could be called upon to preside at the eventual rededication for this temple whenever that might happen. But despite Elder Stevenson's connections to Japan, he was not the one assigned to dedicate the Sapporo Japan Temple in 2016, although he did accompany President Russell M. Nelson, then President of the Quorum of the Twelve Apostles, to that dedication.

If that temple had been dedicated after President Nelson became the Church President, he might have opted to send Elder Stevenson to handle that dedication on his own. But that didn't occur.

In the interim, three years after the dedication of the Sapporo temple, President Nelson, who had since become Church President, started giving his fellow apostles opportunities to officiate at temple dedications and rededications. But for each temple rededicated that year, those were handled by 8 of the 9 most senior apostles (with President Nelson himself not rededicating any of those).

That to me suggests a potential precedent that Elder Christofferson may be the most junior apostle asked preside at a temple rededication. While the President of the Church is free to delegate any task to any other apostle as he is prompted or inclined to do so, until there is an established precedent for any of the 6 junior apostles to be assigned to rededicate a temple, it's my assumption (for the time being) that temple rededications may continue to be presided over by any member of the First Presidency, or any of the 6 most senior members of the Quorum of the Twelve Apostles.

I could, however, see a scenario where the senior apostle presiding takes either Elder Stevenson, Elder Gong, or both, with him to rededicate the Tokyo Japan Temple, whenever that might occur. I need to offer the standard disclaimer here: i do not have any inside track to any information that would corroborate that theory, nor is it within my prerogative or privilege to receive any revelation that would justify that theory.

President Nelson has proven to be a very non-traditional prophet in so many ways, including when it comes to deviating from anything that has been typically a long-time established status quo, and the President of the Church is free to do whatever he is inspired to do. It is his prerogative to determine who to assign to each temple dedication or rededication. So if he is prompted to do so, he could send any of the six junior apostles to rededicate a temple.

But since Elder Christofferson has been the most junior apostle thus far to rededicate a temple, I am not entirely convinced that anyone more junior than Elder Christofferson will be sent to rededicate a temple. The Lord has proven me wrong in the past, and it will surely happen again, but for the time being, my research on recent temple dedications and rededications point me towards that theory.

That does it for now. Any and all comments are, as always, welcome and appreciated, on any post at any time, as long as such comments are made in accordance with the established guidelines. Thank you for the privilege of your time. If you enjoyed what you read here and would like to stay informed of newly added content, please feel free to subscribe. Until my next post, I wish each one of you all the best and pray that the Lord will bless you all in everything you do.

7 comments:

  1. Hello again, everyone! The Newsroom and the Church News have both shared updated guidelines from the Utah Area Presidency relative to COVID-19. The updates released today mark a return to the guidelines as they were in September 2020:

    https://newsroom.churchofjesuschrist.org/article/utah-area-covid-19-udpate-november-2020

    https://www.thechurchnews.com/leaders-and-ministry/2021-02-04/utah-area-updates-covid-19-safety-guidelines-meetings-activities-203427

    Additionally, the Newsroom and the Church News both shared the newest video in the ongoing #HearHim series. This one features Sister Joy D. Jones, Primary General President, who shared her thoughts on the importance of acting when God speaks, and the blessings that come when we do so:

    https://newsroom.churchofjesuschrist.org/article/primary-president-joy-d-jones-shares-new-hearhim-video-blog

    https://www.thechurchnews.com/living-faith/2021-02-04/sister-jones-hear-him-video-blog-primary-203307

    The Newsroom also highlighted how 200 blood drives were recently completed in North America:

    https://newsroom.churchofjesuschrist.org/article/200-blood-drives-completed-in-north-central-us

    Meanwhile, the Church News has also shared insights on how faith, hope, and charity have fueled Church members in Central America following a couple of significantly severe hurricanes:

    https://www.thechurchnews.com/global/2021-02-04/central-america-hurricanes-pandemic-resilience-203292

    The Church News has also highlighted a recent report previously shared through the Newsroom, which described how Latter-day Saint Charities had provided 30 million meals for children in 9 developing nations:

    https://www.thechurchnews.com/global/2021-02-04/latter-day-saint-charities-convoy-of-hope-30-million-meals-203386

    And the Church News continues to highlight the biographies of new leaders called to serve in temples around the world. This week's article featured 8 more couples:

    https://www.thechurchnews.com/callings/2021-02-04/temple-president-matron-8-billings-argentina-brazil-palmyra-provo-mexico-chile-manaus-fortaleza-203160

    All new temple leaders are set to begin their service in August. Although each of the new temple leadership couples called this go-round have rendered extensive Church service (both individually and as couples), the following notes about the current or previous Church assignments of each temple president may be of interest to some of you: 3 formerly served as Area Seventies (1 of whom presently serves as president of the Hill Cumorah Pageant, while 1 other serves as a ward Sunday School President); 2 are current counselors in the presidencies of the same temple for which they will assume oversight (with 1 of those being a former area seventy); 1 is a former stake president (and current service mission leader); 1 is a temple sealer and Sunday School iinstructor; and is a temple sealer, current counselor in the Elders' Quorum Presidency, and a former counselor in the presidency of a different temple than the one over which he will now have oversight.

    The full list on which I am tracking the list of temples for which a new president has been called can be found in the following document:

    https://docs.google.com/document/d/1MpJO3ESKh0h0fvU93GcYOn1M6dIFmY7QnJ67sIeij_A/edit?usp=sharing

    My thanks once again to you all.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. It appears that, while I was preparing the above comment, the Church News shared a new announcement made through a letter from the temple department. Senior missionary couples may now be assigned to serve in temples, taking on the same responsibilities that have, up to this point, been carried out mostly by volunteers who are not set apart as ordinances workers in the temple:

      https://www.thechurchnews.com/temples/2021-02-04/senior-service-missionaries-temple-assignments-203416

      My thanks once again to you all.

      Delete
    2. The Church News has also shared their own article detailing the blood drive to which I referred in my comment at the top of this subthread:

      https://www.thechurchnews.com/living-faith/2021-02-04/the-church-completes-200-blood-drives-in-the-central-u-s-during-2020-blood-shortage-203440

      My thanks once again to you all.

      Delete
  2. With the weekend arriving soon, the Church News and the Neewsroom have each shared one article of unique content:

    https://www.thechurchnews.com/leaders-and-ministry/2021-02-05/college-devotionals-church-leaders-issues-concerns-203286

    https://newsroom.churchofjesuschrist.org/article/salt-lake-temple-renovation-project-updates-february-2021

    If there are any other updates or new temple developments to report, I will be sharing those later. For now, my thanks once again to you all.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Not long after the Newsroom report on the Salt Lake Temple was published, the Church News published its' own article covering that same subject:

      https://www.thechurchnews.com/temples/2021-02-05/salt-lake-temple-renovation-update-january-2021-stones-tunnel-203498

      And a new data set from BYU provides context on the casulaies that occurred during the last global pandemic (the flu) in 1918:

      https://www.thechurchnews.com/history-revisited/2021-02-05/1918-pandemic-death-records-byu-record-linking-lab-familysearch-203465

      My thanks once again to you all.

      Delete
  3. Elder Gay and Elder Vinson both turn 70 this year and if they are released, as expected, there will be two openings in the Presidency of the Seventy. Patzicia.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Patzicia, thanks for taking time to comment. You are correct about Elder Gay and Elder Vinson turning 70 this year. But they are just 2 of 7 total who will be turning 70 at some point this year, as shown in the following document I put together:

      https://docs.google.com/document/d/1R0XG0t36oR2MTm4lt4cR2XptiEN4Z-pYPF06kiVzMao/edit

      So, a couple of thoughts on General Authorities being granted emeritus status. First, it has been a longstanding tradition for new General Authority Seventies to be sustained every April, with current general authorities being granted emeritus status each October.

      There have been a handful of times when a General Authority was granted emeritus status in April. The last time that happened was April 2012, when the entire Presiding Bishopric (Bishops H. David Burton, Richard C. Edgley, and Keith B. McMullin) became both the first Presiding Bishopric to be granted emeritus status and also the first general Church leaders to receive emeritus status without first having served as General Authority Seventies.

      And the last time a new General Authority was sustained in October was a couple of years ago. In October 2018, First Presidency Secretary Brook P. Hales was sustained as a General Authority Seventy, with his call as such having previously been announced roughly six weeks after the April 2019 General Conference.

      That brings me to some thoughts about the Presidency of the Seventy. In April 2018, with Elders Gerrit W. Gong and Ulisses Soares released from that Presidency immediately due to their new calls as apostles, 2 new members of that Presidency were sustained to begin serving immediately.

      But additionally, during that conference, the Church did something it had not previously done by presenting 3 new members of that Presidency for sustaining vote in advance of their new assignments beginning in August.

      Fast forward to last year. Elder L. Whitney Clayton had turned 70 in February, and was serving as Senior President of the Seventy. In April, I had anticipated (and predicted) that a change in the Presidency of the Seventy that would be effective in August would also be sustained in advance during last April's General Conference.

      As we now know, that did not occur. The Church instead announced the change when announcing the area leadership assignments later that month, prior to those going into effect in August. And it wasn't until the October General Conference that the previously-announced change was presented for sustaining vote.

      Since it seems as though 2018 was the exception to the general rule of sustaining such changes to the Presidency of the Seventy after they go into effect, I anticipate that the Church will announce the 2021 area leadership changes in mid-to-late April, and that the new members of the Presidency of the Seventy will be noted in conjunction with that announcement, and that those changes will not be presented for a sustaining vote until the October General Conference. I believe I made note of that theory in my General Conference predictions. Speaking of those predictions, if anyone is wanting to review or comment on those, they can do so in the threads of the following psst:

      https://stokessoundsoff.blogspot.com/2021/02/initial-predictions-for-april-2021.html

      Hope this information is helpful to you, Patzicia, and to anyone else reading this comment. Thanks for taking time to weigh in here. I always appreciate hearing from you.

      Delete

In addition to my life-long love for the subjects which I cover in the posts of this blog, I have long held the belief that we can disagree without becoming disagreeable. Differences of opinion are natural, while being disagreeable in expressing those differences is not. And in that sense, I have no desire to close the door on anyone who earnestly desires to contribute to the ongoing dialogue on subjects covered in the posts on this blog.

At the same time, however, I recognize that we live in a time when incivility, discourtesy, unkindness, and even cyber-bullying has regrettably become part of online interactions. With that in mind, while anyone who wishes can comment on anything if they choose to do so, I hereby reserve the right to immediately delete any comments which are critical, unkind, lack civility, or promote prodcuts, services, and values contrary to either the Church, or to the rules of online etiquette.

I'd also like to remind all who comment here that I try to respond personally to each individual comment as I feel is appropriate. Such replies are not meant to end the conversation, but to acknowledge earnest feedback as it is submitted.

And in order to better preserve the spirit and pure intentions for which this blog was established, I also hereby request that anyone not commenting with a regular user name (particularly those whose comments appear under the "Unknown" or "Anonymous" monikers, give the rest of us a name to work with in addressing any replies. If such individuals do not wish to disclose their actual given names, a pseudonym or nickname would suffice.

Any comments made by individuals who opt to not give a name by which they can ber identified may, depending on the substance and tone of such comments, be subject to deletion as well. I would respectfully ask that all of us do all we can to keep the dialogue positive, polite, and without malice or ill-will. May the Lord bless us all in our discussion of these important matters.