Hello again, everyone! Several weeks later than I'd planned, I am pleased to now share the results of my April 2026 General Conference predictions. So here are my updated speaker lineup (with what actually happened noted in brackets of the appropriate fields); my updated predictions for Church leadership changes (and the statistical report figures), and my masterlist of the most likely candidate cities to get a temple.
I am pleased to also present at this time a scorecard for those predictions, based on the 3-point scoring system I mentioned for each element. If any of you have any questions on the scoring listed therein, please let me know, and I would behappy to address those. I would like tonote that I am including in that scring a score for the new locatioins that had temples announced between President Oaks' October 14 ordination as the Church President and the weekend of the April 2026 General Conference. Therefore, with only two temples announced, the maximum possible score there is 6.
My analysis of the results led me to score the accuracy of these predictions at 56.5%, slightly lower than my average accuracy rate of 60-80%. So that's it for the results of the preditctions. But I also wanted to share how my mock-up of potential table of contents for the May 2026 Liahona compared with the actual thing, in addition to my document showing the lengths of apostolic addresses, each of which was at least a few minutes shorter than they usually have run, and my updated document showing the total number of General Conference talks given by apostles.
Each apostle spoke at least once, with both Presidents Oaks and Christofferson giving 3 addresses apiece. For President Oaks, that includes his opening and closing remarks and his Sunday Morning Session address. For President Christofferson, that includes his Sunday Afternoon Session address and his two opprotuniteies to conduct Church business. Some sources count those, while others don't. But I am choosing to do so for my purpsoes.
Well, that's a wrap on my General Conference postmortem. I invite you all to stay tuned here for my coverage of the latest updates from the Church News, Newsroom, and Church of Jesus Christ Temples sites. I’ll be sure to pass word of those along to you all as soon as I learn about them. In the meantime, that does it for now.
All comments are, as always, welcome and appreciated on any post at any time, as long as all such feedback is made per the established guidelines. I hope any of you who would like to share anything will take your opportunity to “sound off” in the comments below. If you liked what you read here and would like to stay informed of newly added posts and comments, please subscribe to receive the applicable updates.
Thank you for the privilege of your time. Until my next post, I wish you all the best and pray that the Lord will bless you all in everything you do.
No comments:
Post a Comment
In addition to my life-long love for the subjects which I cover in the posts of this blog, I have long held the belief that we can disagree without becoming disagreeable. Differences of opinion are natural, while being disagreeable in expressing those differences is not. And in that sense, I have no desire to close the door on anyone who earnestly desires to contribute to the ongoing dialogue on subjects covered in the posts on this blog.
At the same time, however, I recognize that we live in a time when incivility, discourtesy, unkindness, and even cyber-bullying has regrettably become part of online interactions. With that in mind, while anyone who wishes can comment on anything if they choose to do so, I hereby reserve the right to immediately delete any comments which are critical, unkind, lack civility, or promote prodcuts, services, and values contrary to either the Church, or to the rules of online etiquette.
I'd also like to remind all who comment here that I try to respond personally to each individual comment as I feel is appropriate. Such replies are not meant to end the conversation, but to acknowledge earnest feedback as it is submitted.
And in order to better preserve the spirit and pure intentions for which this blog was established, I also hereby request that anyone not commenting with a regular user name (particularly those whose comments appear under the "Unknown" or "Anonymous" monikers, give the rest of us a name to work with in addressing any replies. If such individuals do not wish to disclose their actual given names, a pseudonym or nickname would suffice.
Any comments made by individuals who opt to not give a name by which they can ber identified may, depending on the substance and tone of such comments, be subject to deletion as well. I would respectfully ask that all of us do all we can to keep the dialogue positive, polite, and without malice or ill-will. May the Lord bless us all in our discussion of these important matters.