I hope none of you who read any of my predictions are taking them as gospel or as being a sure and definite thing. The beauty of the Lord's Church is that it is directed by modern revelation. Many potential sites can be predicted accurately because of information supporting such sites. Others are no more than wild hopes or a best-guess effort that may or may not be in line with where the Lord needs new temples to be built. Since any theories about future site locations or a possible time-frame for temple-related events are subject to so many factors, some of which none but the leading brethren and the Lord may be aware, nothing is official until it is made so through the proper channels. I just wanted to make that clear.
And though I have trimmed this latest list as much as I can, I recognize that there are more than likely some that I've eliminated that should have stayed on there, or some that remained that should have been removed. That is why I request as much feedback as I do: I want to know what people who read my thoughts on the matter think of them. I have no issues with adding or deleting other possibilities.
A couple of additional notes: First, I have provided notes at the bottom of this list of potential temple locations that explain my rationale behind each choice, in addition to some explaining why I have eliminated certain possibilities. Let me know your thoughts, whether in agreement or not. I look forward to the continuing discussion. Thanks!
Here's the list:
Temple Predictions:
3+ temples announced in any of
the following locations:
PRELIMINARY NOTE: Since it is difficult at
best to know where the Lord feels a need for a temple and temple locations are
not as cut-and-dried as I have originally believed them to be, I am doing a
preliminary list, which I will refine as the time for General Conference draws
closer. I will look forward to seeing what happens with those possibilities, if
any are announced at all. So far between 2015 and this year, the 12 newest temples
were announced during the April General Conference. If any temples are
announced, there will only be a few.
ADDITIONAL NOTE: After thinking
further about those temples I feel are most likely in the near future, I have
felt to narrow my choices down considerably. I am now listing them by nation
and then by likelihood within that nation.
Africa: Lagos Nigeria; Kumasi
Ghana; Freetown Sierra Leone
Brazil: Belo Horizonte;
Salvador
Central America: Managua
Nicaragua
Mexico: Puebla Mexico
Pacific: Auckland New Zealand;
Port Moresby Papua New Guinea
South America: Neuquen
Argentina; Valparaiso Chile; Santa Cruz Bolivia
United States: Bentonville
Arkansas Missoula Montana; Layton Utah; Tooele Utah
NOTE: The following (# of
temples, if any, goes here) temples were announced, much to my great delight:
Temple Predictions:
3+ temples announced in any of
the following locations:
NOTE: Since it is difficult at
best to know where the Lord feels a need for a temple and temple locations are
not as cut-and-dried as I have originally believed them to be, I am doing a
preliminary list, which I will refine as the time for General Conference draws
closer. I will look forward to seeing what happens with those possibilities, if
any are announced at all. So far between 2015 and this year, the 12 newest temples
were announced during the April General Conference. If any temples are
announced, there will only be a few.
ADDITIONAL NOTE: After thinking
further about those temples I feel are most likely in the near future, I have
felt to narrow my choices down considerably. I am now listing them by nation
and then by likelihood within that nation.
Africa: Lagos Nigeria; Kumasi
Ghana; Freetown Sierra Leone
*Brazil: Belo Horizonte;
Salvador
!Central America: Managua
Nicaragua
Mexico: Puebla Mexico
Pacific: Auckland New Zealand;
Port Moresby Papua New Guinea
South America: Neuquen
Argentina; Valparaiso Chile; Santa Cruz Bolivia
United States: Bentonville
Arkansas Missoula Montana; Layton Utah; Tooele Utah
NOTE: The following (# of
temples, if any, goes here) temples were announced, much to my great delight:
Notes about potential temple
sites:
1.
Africa has seen one temple announced per year
for the last three years, and the Church is growing rapidly wherever it is
established. While those I listed above seem most likely, I am not ruling out
other possibilities from happening first. These three just seem most likely
based on the information I now have available.
2.
Between the two temples currently under
construction in Brazil, and the two others announced, the focus for that nation
may shift to getting those completed before any others are announced. Whenever
Brazil does get another temple, the two cities I listed above seem to be the
most likely candidates, and may be interchangeable in terms of their future likelihood.
3.
Central America’s next temple will be the one in
Managua, whenever that happens, as there has been both a public proposal by
then-Elder Nelson in 2012, and a site held in reserve until it is needed. Additionally,
Managua is the first in the top ten of those cities that have the strongest
Church presence without a temple, so that is only a matter of time.
4.
In thinking over my list above, the two temples I
had for Europe (in Budapest Hungary and Vienna Austria) make sense logistically
in view of President Monson’s expressed intention to ensure that every Church
member lives within 200 miles of a temple, but don’t seem to be possible in the
near future. As the Paris France temple was dedicated earlier this year, and
the Rome Italy temple is sure to be dedicated in the early months of next year,
the Church might hold off on announcing any other European temples until the
impact of these new temples on that continent is known. Of the two, Budapest is
more likely, but I don’t see that happening in the near future.
5.
The last temple dedication in Mexico happened in
2015, and since that time, only one district has been created. But I have
received feedback indicating that Puebla is the most likely city for Mexico’s
next temple, whether or not that happens anytime soon.
6.
In the Pacific area of the Church, I have heard
that sites have been purchased in both Auckland New Zealand and Port Moresby
Papua New Guinea and have been held in reserve until they are needed. Of the
two, Auckland seems to be the most likely possibility.
7.
For South American nations besides Brazil, the
research I have done has pinpointed the three cities above as the most likely
possibilities. In total, 5 temples have been announced for South America within
the last two years (Brazil included). If this trend continues, I have felt it
very likely that many more temples will be announced for South America over the
next several years.
8.
In previous versions of this list, I had also
had several more possibilities listed for potential temples within the United
States, but since growth has been stagnating here lately, I don’t think it
likely that we will see very many temples announced unless and until regular
growth resumes on a larger scale. That said, I have received reports of sites having
been procured for both Arkansas’s first temple and for Montana’s second in the
cities listed above, and that those temples will be announced whenever
conditions warrant that happening.
9.
Within Utah, temple attendance has always been high.
Layton and Tooele are two cities I have heard mentioned extensively as
potential sites for Utah’s 19th temple I also know that President
Hinckley indicated in 2005 that a temple site had been procured in the
southwestern part of the Salt Lake Valley, and that a subsequent announcement
would follow once membership and Church growth in the valley required it. Some
have tried to assert that this temple has already been announced, but every
source I have found indicates that that notion is incorrect. Until that site
announcement is made, Layton and Tooele appear to be the best candidates for
Utah’s next temples.
Final note:
As with everything else I put together, these are no more than my own thoughts,
feelings, and observations based on the research I have done and the reports I
have received. I hope that is absolutely understood and accepted. No one can
know the mind of the Lord relating to His Church except those authorized to
receive revelation regarding their own spheres of responsibility. While I am
always gratified when my predictions turn out to be correct, I am even more
appreciative of the many times developments do not take place as I project they
will. At the end of the day, the Lord is the only one who can determine best
how to further His work, and He manifests His will to those authorized to lead
the Church and make decisions. Just wanted to end on that note.
No comments:
Post a Comment
In addition to my life-long love for the subjects which I cover in the posts of this blog, I have long held the belief that we can disagree without becoming disagreeable. Differences of opinion are natural, while being disagreeable in expressing those differences is not. And in that sense, I have no desire to close the door on anyone who earnestly desires to contribute to the ongoing dialogue on subjects covered in the posts on this blog.
At the same time, however, I recognize that we live in a time when incivility, discourtesy, unkindness, and even cyber-bullying has regrettably become part of online interactions. With that in mind, while anyone who wishes can comment on anything if they choose to do so, I hereby reserve the right to immediately delete any comments which are critical, unkind, lack civility, or promote prodcuts, services, and values contrary to either the Church, or to the rules of online etiquette.
I'd also like to remind all who comment here that I try to respond personally to each individual comment as I feel is appropriate. Such replies are not meant to end the conversation, but to acknowledge earnest feedback as it is submitted.
And in order to better preserve the spirit and pure intentions for which this blog was established, I also hereby request that anyone not commenting with a regular user name (particularly those whose comments appear under the "Unknown" or "Anonymous" monikers, give the rest of us a name to work with in addressing any replies. If such individuals do not wish to disclose their actual given names, a pseudonym or nickname would suffice.
Any comments made by individuals who opt to not give a name by which they can ber identified may, depending on the substance and tone of such comments, be subject to deletion as well. I would respectfully ask that all of us do all we can to keep the dialogue positive, polite, and without malice or ill-will. May the Lord bless us all in our discussion of these important matters.