Temple Predictions:
3+ temples announced in any of
the following locations:
NOTE: Since it is difficult at
best to know where the Lord feels a need for a temple and temple locations are
not as cut-and-dried as I have originally believed them to be, I am doing a
preliminary list, which I will refine as the time for General Conference draws
closer. I will look forward to seeing what happens with those possibilities, if
any are announced at all. So far between 2015 and this year, the 12 newest
temples were announced during the April General Conference. If any temples are
announced, there will only be a few.
ADDITIONAL NOTE: After thinking
further about those temples I feel are most likely in the near future, I have
felt to narrow my choices down considerably. I am now listing them by nation
and then by likelihood within that nation.
Africa: Lagos Nigeria; Kumasi
Ghana; Freetown Sierra Leone
!Central & South America
(including Brazil and Mexico): Managua Nicaragua; Puebla Mexico; Valparaiso Chile; Belo Horizonte/Salvador
Brazil; Neuquen Argentina
Pacific: Auckland New Zealand;
Port Moresby Papua New Guinea
United States: Bentonville
Arkansas Missoula Montana; Layton Utah; Tooele Utah
Notes about potential temple
sites:
1.
Africa has seen one temple announced per year
for the last three years, and the Church is growing rapidly wherever it is
established. While those I listed above seem most likely, I am not ruling out
other possibilities from happening first. These three just seem most likely
based on the information I now have available.
2.
Within the wide region of Central & South
America (including Brazil and Mexico), unprecedented growth continues. Those
possibilities mentioned above seem most likely for that region. Managua has had
a temple proposed and a site awaiting for quite a while now. While growth may
not be happening as swiftly in Mexico, Puebla has long been considered as the
city that will be home to Mexico’s next temple. And while the next temples for
Chile, Brazil, and Argentina may not be announced for a while, the sites noted
above do seem to be most likely.
3.
While European temples are always possible, and
while I have heard that Hungary and Austria might be the next European nations
to get a temple, and while those cities make sense in terms of President Monson’s
expressed desire to ensure that every member is within 200 miles of a temple,
the Church may be waiting to see how the dedication of the Paris France (last
May) and Rome Italy temples (set to open sometime during 2018) and the rededication
of the Frankfurt Germany Temple (which may take place around that same time)
might affect the European saints prior to any new announcements. If these
temples are kept busy enough, then the Church might announce other temples
there. Until more is known, that seems to be a fair assessment.
4.
In the Pacific area of the Church, I have heard
that sites have been purchased in both Auckland New Zealand and Port Moresby
Papua New Guinea and have been held in reserve until they are needed. Of the
two, Auckland seems to be the most likely possibility.
5.
In previous versions of this list, I had also
had several more possibilities listed for potential temples within the United
States, but since growth has been stagnating of late, I don’t think it likely
that we will see all that many new temples announced announced unless and until
regular growth resumes on a larger scale. That said, I have received reports of
sites having been procured for both Arkansas’s first temple and for Montana’s
second in the cities listed above, and that those temples will be announced
whenever unit growth and attendance at other temples within those areas warrant
that happening.
6.
Within Utah, temple attendance has always been high.
Layton and Tooele are two cities I have heard mentioned extensively as
potential sites for Utah’s 19th temple I also know that President
Hinckley indicated in 2005 that a temple site had been procured in the
southwestern part of the Salt Lake Valley, and that a subsequent announcement
would follow once membership and Church growth in the valley required it. Some
have tried to assert that this temple has already been announced, but every
source I have found indicates that that notion is incorrect. Until that site
announcement is made, Layton and Tooele appear to be the best candidates for
Utah’s next temples.
Final note:
As with everything else I put together, these are no more than my own thoughts,
feelings, and observations based on the research I have done and the reports I
have received. I hope that is absolutely understood and accepted. No one can
know the mind of the Lord relating to His Church except those authorized to
receive revelation regarding their own spheres of responsibility. While I am
always gratified when my predictions turn out to be correct, I am even more
appreciative of the many times developments do not take place as I project they
will. At the end of the day, the Lord is the only one who can determine best
how to further His work, and He manifests His will to those authorized to lead
the Church and make decisions. Just wanted to end on that note.
No comments:
Post a Comment
In addition to my life-long love for the subjects which I cover in the posts of this blog, I have long held the belief that we can disagree without becoming disagreeable. Differences of opinion are natural, while being disagreeable in expressing those differences is not. And in that sense, I have no desire to close the door on anyone who earnestly desires to contribute to the ongoing dialogue on subjects covered in the posts on this blog.
At the same time, however, I recognize that we live in a time when incivility, discourtesy, unkindness, and even cyber-bullying has regrettably become part of online interactions. With that in mind, while anyone who wishes can comment on anything if they choose to do so, I hereby reserve the right to immediately delete any comments which are critical, unkind, lack civility, or promote prodcuts, services, and values contrary to either the Church, or to the rules of online etiquette.
I'd also like to remind all who comment here that I try to respond personally to each individual comment as I feel is appropriate. Such replies are not meant to end the conversation, but to acknowledge earnest feedback as it is submitted.
And in order to better preserve the spirit and pure intentions for which this blog was established, I also hereby request that anyone not commenting with a regular user name (particularly those whose comments appear under the "Unknown" or "Anonymous" monikers, give the rest of us a name to work with in addressing any replies. If such individuals do not wish to disclose their actual given names, a pseudonym or nickname would suffice.
Any comments made by individuals who opt to not give a name by which they can ber identified may, depending on the substance and tone of such comments, be subject to deletion as well. I would respectfully ask that all of us do all we can to keep the dialogue positive, polite, and without malice or ill-will. May the Lord bless us all in our discussion of these important matters.