Stokes Sounds Off: Temple Site Possibilities: Asia Area--Part One: Current Temples

Search This Blog

Leaderboard

Saturday, November 25, 2017

Temple Site Possibilities: Asia Area--Part One: Current Temples

Hello again, everyone! As many of you know, around a month ago, I began a new series of posts to share my thoughts about future temple site possibilities within each of the Church's geographical areas and to ask for your input on those locations or any others I may have missed, with a view to refining that list prior to the next General Conference in April. Because of all I have been dealing with personally, and because of all the Church and temple news I felt needed to be more of a priority, my last post in that series was done on October 30.

I apologize that I have taken so long to continue the series. This post will discuss the current temples within the Asia Area of the Church. Due to the sheer volume of data I will be presenting about this area, I will be devoting this post to discussing current temples in the area, and will do a second post later on detailing the possibilities I have put together.

Just a preliminary note before I begin my analysis of those possibilities: the Asia Area was one where I had only listed a few possibilities initially for quite a long time. It was not until I received some advice from a few experts on temple-related matters (in which I was encouraged to expand my net) that I realized just how many great potential sites exist within the Asia Area of the Church. So, which temples currently cover the area? Let's dive right into that subject.

The main reason I have felt so strongly that the Asia Area may need many new temples is that there are currently only 2 operating temples within that area (in Hong Kong China and Taipei Taiwan). One other has been announced for Bangkok Thailand, and if member speculation is correct, an existing building housing Church offices will be rebuilt and renovated into a multi-purpose edifice that will continue to have Church offices, but will also serve as a meetinghouse and the temple, in the mold of existing temples in Hong Kong China and Manhattan New York. Depending on if and when that is confirmed, we could potentially see the Bangkok Temple dedicated within the next 3-5 years or less. I am keeping my eye on that and will pass along any new information as I have it.

For now, let's turn our attention to the size of the current temple districts in the Asia Area. First, I want to talk about the Taipei Taiwan Temple. That district  currently serves the 17 stakes that have been established in that nation, where there are also a total of 2 missions (in Taipei and Taichung) and where the 17 stakes break down further into 108 wards and 9 branches. That one temple may or may not be sufficient for the Taiwanese Saints, especially those living a fair distance from Taipei. So I have my eye on a candidate for Taiwan's second temple, for which I will be sharing my thoughts in my next post about this area.

In the meantime, once the Bangkok Thailand Temple is constructed and dedicated, that will split the Hong Kong China Temple District. How will that happen? Let me answer that by sharing some data about the current units comprising that district, and which of those units will likely be transferred when the Bangkok Thailand Temple is dedicated.

Currently, the Hong Kong China Temple District is comprised of the following countries, which have the following number of Church units at present.

Hong Kong: 1 mission; 6 stakes; 1 district (which break down into 33 wards and 9 branches, or a total of 42 congregations)
India: 2 missions; 4 stakes; 2 districts (which break down into 21 wards and 22 branches, or a total of 43 congregations)
Thailand: 1 mission; 4 stakes; 2 districts (which break down into 22 wards and 19 branches, or a total of 41 congregations)
Cambodia: 1 mission; 2 stakes; 4 districts (which break down into 10 wards and 19 branches, or a total of 29 congregations)
Indonesia: 1 mission; 2 stakes; 1 district (which break down into 15 wards and 9 branches, or a total of 24 congregations)
Mongolia: 1 mission; 2 stakes; 1 district (which break down into 12 wards and 13 branches, or a total of 25 congregations)
China: No missions; 4 districts; 16 congregations total (all branches)
Vietnam: 1 mission; 2 districts; 10 congregations total (all branches)
Macau: No missions; 1 district; 3 congregations total (all branches)
Sri Lanka: No missions; 1 district; 4 congregations total (all branches)

Total units in the Hong Kong China Temple district: 9 missions; 21 stakes; 25 districts (which in turn make up 123 wards and 153 branches (a grand total of 276 congregations)

When the Bangkok Thailand Temple is dedicated, that district, which is anticipated to include Thailand, Cambodia, India, Indonesia, Singapore and Malaysia, will take in 6 missions; 13 stakes and 15 districts, which currently break down further into 78 wards and 102 branches, for a total of 180 congregations.

Removing those units from the Hong Kong China Temple district will leave Hong Kong to cover the remaining 3 missions; 8 stakes; 10 districts, which in turn will be comprised of 45 wards and 51 branches, for a total of 96 congregations.

Having shared that data, I also wanted to note that the one problem in the Asia Area is that because Asia is the largest of the seven continents, the nations within it are also substantially larger than anywhere else, and the distance between each of those nations and their assigned temples is fairly substantial. By that fact alone, the Asia Area is prime for many potential future temple locations. Where might those be? Stay tuned for my next post in which I will share my thoughts on that.

That does it for this post. Any comments are, as always, welcome and appreciated. Thank you for the privilege of your time. Until my next post, I wish each one of you all the best and pray that the Lord will bless you all in everything you do.

9 comments:

  1. Another fact on the Taipei temple is that it is one of the smallest temples of the church and is on a small lot, so empanding may not be an option. With 17 stakes, it is very possible a second temple will be built, I think most likely in Taichung. There is also a temple in Soule Korea. I wonder if a second temple could be there in the coming years. I look towards the day temples will be built in Cambodia, India, Mongolia, and Indonesia. Other options will be Singapore, Malaysia, and Paupa New Guinea.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Thank you for that comment, Chris! As I'm sure you know by now, I did another post today discussing specifics for the Asia Area, and I mentioned Taichung, Cambodia, India, Mongolia, Indonesia, and Singapore. As for Papua New Guinea, I do think we will see one there sooner rather than later (it's been on my personal list for as long as I have considered such options) and I will go more into the specifics on why I feel that way when I cover the temple possibilities in the Central America Area. Thanks again

      Delete
    2. This comment has been removed by the author.

      Delete
    3. I think Papua New Guinea is in the Pacific area, but very close to Asia and part of the same island chain as Indonesia. I am curious why you will cover it with Central America. Also last week there was an interesting article on the church in Indonesia in the SL Trib.

      Delete
    4. Good catch, Chris! TNew Guinea is in the Pacific Area, and I will be covering that when I get to the areas of the Church beginning with P. I don't know why I was thinking Central America on that one. Probably just got confused. Sorry about that. Thanks again.

      Delete
  2. In addition to the 16 branches in China that are for foreigners or non-Chinease, there are many branches for naitve Chinese members throughout the country. The church has a great website called Mormonsandchina.org that explains a lot about this. It includes the laws and rules for members in China.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Thanks for this comment as well, Chris! I am more than a little familiar with the situation of the Church in China. Members of a prominent Chinese family are good friends of my mom's side of the family, and we have watched with great interest how they and their two children have navigated the laws and regulations of that nation with their belief in and testimony of the Gospel. I think we will definitely see the day when the political climate in China calms sufficiently enough for the Church to prosper. How soon that might be is anyone's guess. Thanks again, Chris!

      Delete
    2. I think China is Prosperina well in recent years. Although we can't actively proselyte there, many join the church overseas, return home, attend church, and can teach their immidiate family members.

      Delete
    3. The situation of the Church in China is difficult to navigate around, that is certain. But it is also true that it is easy for the Church to do so because of their guidelines about honoring the laws, ordinances, and regulations of any government in which the Church has a presence. I fully believe that, at some point, the Church in China will prosper, including allowing missionary work to move forward and other temples to be built there. China comprises the largest part of the Asia Area of the Church, and I can't wait to see what the Lord has in store for the gospel to progress in that nation. Thanks again, Chris!

      Delete

In addition to my life-long love for the subjects which I cover in the posts of this blog, I have long held the belief that we can disagree without becoming disagreeable. Differences of opinion are natural, while being disagreeable in expressing those differences is not. And in that sense, I have no desire to close the door on anyone who earnestly desires to contribute to the ongoing dialogue on subjects covered in the posts on this blog.

At the same time, however, I recognize that we live in a time when incivility, discourtesy, unkindness, and even cyber-bullying has regrettably become part of online interactions. With that in mind, while anyone who wishes can comment on anything if they choose to do so, I hereby reserve the right to immediately delete any comments which are critical, unkind, lack civility, or promote prodcuts, services, and values contrary to either the Church, or to the rules of online etiquette.

I'd also like to remind all who comment here that I try to respond personally to each individual comment as I feel is appropriate. Such replies are not meant to end the conversation, but to acknowledge earnest feedback as it is submitted.

And in order to better preserve the spirit and pure intentions for which this blog was established, I also hereby request that anyone not commenting with a regular user name (particularly those whose comments appear under the "Unknown" or "Anonymous" monikers, give the rest of us a name to work with in addressing any replies. If such individuals do not wish to disclose their actual given names, a pseudonym or nickname would suffice.

Any comments made by individuals who opt to not give a name by which they can ber identified may, depending on the substance and tone of such comments, be subject to deletion as well. I would respectfully ask that all of us do all we can to keep the dialogue positive, polite, and without malice or ill-will. May the Lord bless us all in our discussion of these important matters.