Scenario #1
|
SAM
|
SAA
|
PH
|
SUM
|
SUA
|
Ballard
|
Apr 2018
|
Apr 2017
|
Apr 2015
|
Oct 2016
|
Oct 2017*
|
Holland
|
Oct 2017
|
Apr 2017*
|
Oct 2016
|
Apr 2015
|
Apr 2018
|
Uchtdorf
|
Oct 2017 (FP)
|
Apr 2017 (FP; Church
Officer Sustaining)*
|
Oct 2017 (FP; both)
|
Apr 2017 (FP)
|
Apr 2018
|
Bednar
|
Oct 2013*
|
Apr 2018
|
Apr 2017
|
Oct 2017
|
Oct 2016
|
Cook
|
Oct 2015
|
Oct 2017
|
Oct 2014
|
Apr 2016*
|
Apr 2018
|
Christofferson
|
Oct 2017
|
Oct 2016*
|
Apr 2018
|
Apr 2016
|
Apr 2017
|
Andersen
|
Apr 2018
|
Apr 2017
|
Oct 2015
|
Apr 2013*
|
Oct 2017
|
Rasband
|
Apr 2014 (70 Pres)*
|
Oct 2017
|
Apr 2018
|
Apr 2017
|
Oct 2016
|
Stevenson
|
Apr 2018
|
Oct 2017
|
Oct 2012 (PB)
|
Oct 2015
|
Apr 2017*
|
Renlund
|
Apr 2017
|
Apr 2018
|
Oct 2017
|
Oct 2015
|
Oct 2016*
|
Gong
|
N/A*
|
Oct 2010 (GA Seventy)
|
N/A
|
N/A
|
Apr 2018
|
Soares
|
Apr 2017 (70 Pres)
|
Apr 2012 (GA Seventy)*
|
Apr 2015 (70 Pres)
|
N/A
|
Apr 2018
|
Ballard
|
SUA1
|
SAM
|
Bednar (4 is 1)
|
Holland
|
SAA4
|
|
Gong (11 is 2)
|
Uchtdorf
|
SAA1
|
|
Rasband (8 is 3)
|
Bednar
|
SUA3
|
SAA
|
Christofferson (6 is 4)
|
Cook
|
SAM1
|
|
Soares (11 is 5)
|
Christofferson
|
SAA3
|
|
Uchtdorf (3 is 6)
|
Andersen
|
SUM2
|
|
Holland (2 is 7)
|
Rasband
|
SAM3
|
SUM
|
Andersen (7 is 8)
|
Stevenson
|
SAA2
|
|
Cook (5 is 9)
|
Renlund
|
SUA2
|
SUA
|
Ballard (1 is 10)
|
Gong
|
SAM2
|
|
Renlund (10 is 11)
|
Soares
|
SUM1
|
|
Stevenson (9 is 12)
|
Additionally, another thing I like about this scenario is that the three speakers in the Sunday Afternoon Session all spoke in this session in different General Conferences, which has been a somewhat common occurrence for that session. And although I can see why the Church might prefer to have one of the two newest apostles speak in the Sunday Morning Session for the first time, this scenario would enable both new apostles to speak during the Saturday sessions after both spoke on Sunday last April.
My final argument in favor of this scenario is that I looked ahead to what might happen in future General Conferences if this scenario occurs, and, compared to the other scenario, this one did not create nearly as many potential problems for future General Conferences. This concludes my notes on scenario #1.
Scenario #2
|
SAM
|
SAA
|
PH
|
SUM
|
SUA
|
Ballard
|
Apr 2018
|
Apr 2017
|
Apr 2015
|
Oct 2016
|
Oct 2017*
|
Holland
|
Oct 2017
|
Apr 2017*
|
Oct 2016
|
Apr 2015
|
Apr 2018
|
Uchtdorf
|
Oct 2017 (FP)
|
Apr 2017 (FP; Church
Officer Sustaining)*
|
Oct 2017 (FP; both)
|
Apr 2017 (FP)
|
Apr 2018
|
Bednar
|
Oct 2013
|
Apr 2018
|
Apr 2017
|
Oct 2017
|
Oct 2016*
|
Cook
|
Oct 2015*
|
Oct 2017
|
Oct 2014
|
Apr 2016
|
Apr 2018
|
Christofferson
|
Oct 2017
|
Oct 2016*
|
Apr 2018
|
Apr 2016
|
Apr 2017
|
Andersen
|
Apr 2018
|
Apr 2017
|
Oct 2015
|
Apr 2013*
|
Oct 2017
|
Rasband
|
Apr 2014 (70 Pres)*
|
Oct 2017
|
Apr 2018
|
Apr 2017
|
Oct 2016
|
Stevenson
|
Apr 2018
|
Oct 2017*
|
Oct 2012 (PB)
|
Oct 2015
|
Apr 2017
|
Renlund
|
Apr 2017
|
Apr 2018
|
Oct 2017
|
Oct 2015
|
Oct 2016*
|
Gong
|
N/A*
|
Oct 2010 (GA Seventy)
|
N/A
|
N/A
|
Apr 2018
|
Soares
|
Apr 2017 (70 Pres)
|
Apr 2012 (GA Seventy)
|
Apr 2015 (70 Pres)
|
N/A*
|
Apr 2018
|
Ballard
|
SUA1
|
SAM
|
Cook (5 is 1)
|
Holland
|
SAA4
|
|
Gong (11 is 2)
|
Uchtdorf
|
SAA1
|
|
Rasband (8 is 3)
|
Bednar
|
SUA3
|
SAA
|
Uchtdorf (3 is 4)
|
Cook
|
SAM1
|
|
Stevenson (8 is 5)
|
Christofferson
|
SAA3
|
|
Christofferson (6 is 6)
|
Andersen
|
SUM2
|
|
Holland (2 is 7)
|
Rasband
|
SAM3
|
SUM
|
Soares (12 is 8)
|
Stevenson
|
SAA2
|
|
Andersen (7 is 9)
|
Renlund
|
SUA2
|
SUA
|
Ballard (1 is 10)
|
Gong
|
SAM2
|
|
Renlund (10 is 11)
|
Soares
|
SUM1
|
|
Bednar (4 is 12)
|
Pertinent notes: This scenario is good in that it allows our three international apostles to speak in three separate sessions. I also like the fact that this scenario allows the five apostles who spoke in the Sunday Afternoon Session to be split up further than they were with the other scenario. I also like the fact that this scenario features one of the two new apostles speaking in the Sunday Morning Session (which neither has done yet), and I likewise appreciate that this scenario features all three of the Quorum members called in October 2015 speaking in different sessions.
Although it is not uncommon for seatmates in the apostleship to speak in the same session (which happens a lot), there is only one set of apostolic seatmates speaking in the same session in this scenario. A few downsides of this scenario are that Elder Bednar would have to wait until April 2019 at earliest for his next opportunity to speak in the Saturday Morning Session, which he has not done in the last 5 years.
Also, two of the three apostles in the Sunday Afternoon Session in this scenario (Elders Bednar and Renlund) spoke together in this same session in October 2016, and they also spoke together again in the Saturday Afternoon Session last April. Although it is not uncommon for two Quorum members to speak in the same session for two or more conferences in a row, the general rotation has seen Quorum members more spread out than that (meaning that if two apostles speak in the same session one conference, they are more likely to speak in different sessions in the next General Conference.
Now, if I may, some general observations about identical elements in both scenarios. Unless the First Presidency does wind up assigning one of the apostles to speak during the Women's Session (which is not out of the question or impossible), then that will most likely result in only two Quorum members speaking in the Saturday Morning Session.
Next, although it is a general rule that two apostolic seatmates do not generally speak in the same session more than one General Conference in a row, there have been exceptions to that. And in all of the many test scenarios I ran in preparation for posting on this subject, the scenarios that worked most effectively were these two, which both feature Elders Holland and Uchtdorf speaking during the Saturday Afternoon Session.
Other similar elements between the two scenarios are the fact that, in both, Elders Gong and Rasband speak during the Saturday Morning Session, Elder Christofferson (who has not spoken in the Saturday Afternoon Session within the two years previous to October 2018) would have the chance to do so here, Elder Andersen will speak in the Sunday Morning Session, since he last did so in April 2013 (and it is rare for a member of the Quorum of the Twelve to have not spoken in any given session within a four-year period, the Priesthood Session being the exception for obvious reasons). And finally, both scenarios see Elders Ballard and Renlund speaking during the Sunday Afternoon Session.
Now that I have presented my thoughts about the merits and downsides of both scenarios, I look forward to hearing from you all about which of the two scenarios you might prefer, or if I have overlooked or failed to consider anything in putting the two together. I will take such feedback into account when finalizing my predictions for the October 2018 General Conference, and I welcome comments on this issue until the week before the conference begins. Your feedback is, as always, welcome and appreciated.
That does it for this post. Thank you for the privilege of your time. Until my next post, I wish each one of you all the best and pray that the Lord will bless you all in everything you do.
No comments:
Post a Comment
In addition to my life-long love for the subjects which I cover in the posts of this blog, I have long held the belief that we can disagree without becoming disagreeable. Differences of opinion are natural, while being disagreeable in expressing those differences is not. And in that sense, I have no desire to close the door on anyone who earnestly desires to contribute to the ongoing dialogue on subjects covered in the posts on this blog.
At the same time, however, I recognize that we live in a time when incivility, discourtesy, unkindness, and even cyber-bullying has regrettably become part of online interactions. With that in mind, while anyone who wishes can comment on anything if they choose to do so, I hereby reserve the right to immediately delete any comments which are critical, unkind, lack civility, or promote prodcuts, services, and values contrary to either the Church, or to the rules of online etiquette.
I'd also like to remind all who comment here that I try to respond personally to each individual comment as I feel is appropriate. Such replies are not meant to end the conversation, but to acknowledge earnest feedback as it is submitted.
And in order to better preserve the spirit and pure intentions for which this blog was established, I also hereby request that anyone not commenting with a regular user name (particularly those whose comments appear under the "Unknown" or "Anonymous" monikers, give the rest of us a name to work with in addressing any replies. If such individuals do not wish to disclose their actual given names, a pseudonym or nickname would suffice.
Any comments made by individuals who opt to not give a name by which they can ber identified may, depending on the substance and tone of such comments, be subject to deletion as well. I would respectfully ask that all of us do all we can to keep the dialogue positive, polite, and without malice or ill-will. May the Lord bless us all in our discussion of these important matters.