Hello, all! As anticipated, funeral services were held today for
General Authority Seventy Elder Bruce D. Porter. Also as anticipated, the
Deseret News gave a report on that commemoration of his life. But what was not
expected was the difference between the report of the services honoring Elder
Rudd yesterday and the same today for Elder Porter. Rather than listing
specific General Authority attendees, as was done in the article about Elder
Rudd the article about Elder Porter only vaguely made mention of those in
attendance. I am sure those specifics may be added given time, if they become
available, but for now, the article is not clear in that regard.
That being said,
the General Authorities of the Church appear to have been well represented in
terms of the number of them in attendance, even though specific attendees were
not known. President Eyring represented the First Presidency. 75% (9 members)
of the Quorum of the Twelve were also in attendance, as were four members (a
clear majority) of the Presidency of the Seventy and many other unnamed General
Authorities and general officers of the Church.
The most weird
thing about the article reporting the services, in my opinion, was the fact
that the article, written earlier today, was nowhere to be found on the main
LDS Church News website. I only found it by running a search for it. Also, it
is indicated in the article that the article itself was put together as press
time approached and that a more full report would be contained in the next
print edition of the Church News (though it indicated that the full report
would be available instantly on the Church News website). For now, if any of
you would like to read the version to which I am referring, click
here. I will post the more complete report as soon as I am able to find it.
Well, with how
very busy it has been at work today, it's time for me to go home. Depending on
what I might learn in terms of other Church news and developments, I may be
posting again as needed once I get there. Thanks, as always, for your kind
readership and attention. Any and all comments continue to be welcome and
appreciated.
(Added from home
about 75 minutes later) Click
here for the more extensive report I referenced above. Still no
specific list of attendees from the various leadership groups mentioned in the
article. But perhaps the numbers mentioned above are more indicative of Elder
Porter's scope of influence than an actual list of participants would be. Hope
this additional information is helpful to you.
(Still later) We
have yet another source available to us in regard to Elder Porter's funeral
services. This
article from the Mormon Newsroom on lds.org, goes into greater detail
than that which has been provided by the Church News. Still no official list of
participants, but another amazing read nonetheless. Another great report of the
events commemorating the life of this amazing spiritual giant. Stay tuned for
more on all Church news and developments as I hear of them. Thanks again.
No comments:
Post a Comment
In addition to my life-long love for the subjects which I cover in the posts of this blog, I have long held the belief that we can disagree without becoming disagreeable. Differences of opinion are natural, while being disagreeable in expressing those differences is not. And in that sense, I have no desire to close the door on anyone who earnestly desires to contribute to the ongoing dialogue on subjects covered in the posts on this blog.
At the same time, however, I recognize that we live in a time when incivility, discourtesy, unkindness, and even cyber-bullying has regrettably become part of online interactions. With that in mind, while anyone who wishes can comment on anything if they choose to do so, I hereby reserve the right to immediately delete any comments which are critical, unkind, lack civility, or promote prodcuts, services, and values contrary to either the Church, or to the rules of online etiquette.
I'd also like to remind all who comment here that I try to respond personally to each individual comment as I feel is appropriate. Such replies are not meant to end the conversation, but to acknowledge earnest feedback as it is submitted.
And in order to better preserve the spirit and pure intentions for which this blog was established, I also hereby request that anyone not commenting with a regular user name (particularly those whose comments appear under the "Unknown" or "Anonymous" monikers, give the rest of us a name to work with in addressing any replies. If such individuals do not wish to disclose their actual given names, a pseudonym or nickname would suffice.
Any comments made by individuals who opt to not give a name by which they can ber identified may, depending on the substance and tone of such comments, be subject to deletion as well. I would respectfully ask that all of us do all we can to keep the dialogue positive, polite, and without malice or ill-will. May the Lord bless us all in our discussion of these important matters.