Given the progress I reported in the blog post below, it has
become necessary to revise my projections and predictions for when future
temple-related events might be announced and scheduled. I am excited to be able
to do this again, just three weeks after the last edition. In view of the fact
that the newest temple construction progress report appears in the post below,
this post will mainly serve as a summary of the changes I have felt are
necessary.
The next temple-related event will be the announced groundbreaking
in Rio de Janeiro Brazil on March 4. That groundbreaking will be done by Elder
Claudio R. M. Costa, the most senior General Authority Seventy who has served
for almost six years as president of the Church’s Brazil Area. So little is
known as yet in terms of the design for the temple and how long construction
might take. But I will venture a guess about that timetable below.
It is also more than likely that we will very shortly have an
announcement of the groundbreaking for the Arequipa Peru temple. I could see
that happening before the dedication of the Paris France Temple on May 20. Not
sure what to make of the report that we might hear of a site announcement and
groundbreaking for Harare Zimbabwe within the next short while. It may very
well be that all that could also take place before the Paris France dedication.
Stay tuned for more on that as I hear of it.
I have spoken before of how the construction commencement in Harare might prove to be historically significant for several reasons. I will not rehash that now, but I will post more information on this as I am able to.
In addition to the Paris France dedication on May 20, we also have
the rededication on June 4 for the Idaho Falls Idaho Temple. It will be amazing
to see those events happen. I am especially excited for the Paris temple dedication
for the reasons I have before explained.
Because of the progress made in Tucson Arizona, it seems on track
to be the next one scheduled for dedication. I could see such an announcement
being made in the early months of this year, perhaps before the Paris dedication
happens, with the Tucson dedication itself happening in early August.
As for the dedication date for the Meridian Idaho Temple is likely
to be announced within the next 3 or 4 months, and the dedication itself will
likely happen in late August or early September.
With the Cedar City Utah Temple, there is still reason to believe
that the dedication could be announced within the next six months, if not
sooner, and might take place in late August or early September as well.
I could also see the renovation of the Jordan River Utah Temple being
completed around August, with the rededication being announced about a month
later and scheduled for either late November or early December 2017. I wouldn’t
be surprised at all if things speed up somehow and that rededication takes
place around the events of the Meridian and Cedar City temples. Stay tuned for
more on that as I learn of it.
I am still of the belief that the dedication in Kinshasa will precede the dedication in Rome. I wouldn’t be surprised if a dedication for Kinshasa was announced during the spring of 2018, with the actual dedication to follow, perhaps sometime in May or June.
In terms of the Frankfurt Germany Temple, I feel sure that that
renovation will be completed within the same timeframe as that of the Kinshasa
dedication. Rome might be the next one completed, but a dedication might not
take place until August or September, after the annual July recess for General
Authorities. That estimation is me speaking optimistically based on my
observation of the completion progress in Rome.
Concepcion is still likely, in my opinion, to have a dedication
announcement within the first half of 2018, with the dedication itself to
follow sometime in either August or September, but it wouldn’t surprise me at
all if it was to even precede Rome in that milestone.
In spite of the delays I always believed would prevail in the
construction of the Durban South Africa Temple (this belief was fueled by the
report my mother, a South African native, gave me regarding the prevailing work
ethic of South Africans, especially those in the construction business), that
construction still seems to be on schedule. I feel confident that the temple
will be completed within a similar time frame to that which is almost certain
for Concepcion and Rome, with an announcement for the dedication made within
the first half of 2018, and the dedication actually scheduled for August or
September as well.
The temple in Winnipeg has yet to progress beyond the
groundbreaking. However, given its size (very small), it seems that
construction might be completed by around August 2018, with the dedication
taking place in either late November or else early December 2018. It wouldn’t
surprise me if a similar timeline held true for the temple in Barranquilla
Colombia, which is further along in terms of construction, but will be a much
larger edifice.
In the meantime, for the first time in doing such predictions, I
feel bold enough to project completion dates for the two temples anticipated to
be completed sometime around 2019. Despite the five-year span between the
groundbreaking and the actual commencement of construction in Fortaleza Brazil,
that construction is progressing rapidly. I reiterate my feelings that construction
will be completed there within the early months of 2019, with the actual
dedication taking place in either April or perhaps possibly May.
The Lisbon Portugal Temple is at a point that solidifies my belief
that a similar time frame may be very likely to prevail as that which I have
proposed above for the Fortaleza temple. It would not surprise me if these two
traded spots a couple of times in terms of future completion. But right now, it
seems safe to say that.
While so little is currently know regarding the design, size or
estimated construction timeframe for the Rio de Janeiro Temple, I would love to
see it completed around the same time as the Fortaleza temple. If that happens,
it would be the first time since 2000 that two Brazilian temples will be
dedicated in such close proximity. (The Recife and Porto Alegre Brazil Temples
were both dedicated in December of that year, on the 15th and 17th
respectively.)
It is not unreasonable to believe that the temples in Arequipa
Peru and Harare Zimbabwe might also be completed before the end of 2019. And
depending on how many temples might additionally have a groundbreaking this
year, the number to be completed might increase further.
As I have stated before, the Church is well on track to add 4 new
operating temples by the end of 2017, and six more in 2018. Two temples may be
rededicated this year, with the only other one currently undergoing renovation
on track to be completed next year. In the meantime, there are many others that
could potentially have renovations starting either this year or next year. There
is not any solid way to tell which temples might be so renovated. But there are
a number of our earlier temples that have never before had anything like that
done that may be good candidates within the next couple of years. If any of you
have any theories regarding this subject, please let me know. And it wouldn’t
surprise me in the least if some of the more recent temples were also scheduled
for renovation.
One thing is certain: With these events likely to happen at or
around the times indicated here, it would almost completely reduce and
eliminate any semblance of a backlog in temple progress, and increases the
likelihood that many more temples could be announced within the next two years.
The exact number of those announcements remains to be seen, though I have given
my thoughts regarding the most likely and most imminent picks.
Future groundbreakings may be more unpredictable to anticipate
than I originally thought. I look at the groundbreaking in Winnipeg, and it
happened much faster than usual. And with the way things unfolded in Rio, any
delays that existed were cleared up very quickly.
That said, given what I have observed, in addition to the
already-scheduled groundbreaking in Rio and the possibility that we might soon
hear of a groundbreaking in Arequipa and also of a site announcement and groundbreaking
in Harare, I will say that I could see the next groundbreaking taking place for
the first Haitian temple in Port-au-Prince. I have no reason to back this up.
It’s just how I feel, and we could have the site announcement and the
groundbreaking by or before the end of this year.
A groundbreaking for Bangkok could happen by the beginning of
2018. The same timetable could prevail for the Abidjan temple. Who knows how
long the currently reported delays in Urdaneta might last. I might venture to
say that the remaining temples (the three others announced last year) might
well have a groundbreaking by or before 2019.
I’m also very sure that many more temples could be announced within
the next couple of years and have construction started as the Lord permits. I
am very much looking forward to future events.
I continue to very much appreciate the feedback I get on things I
post about here. Any and all comments on this new post are welcome. I look forward
to the ongoing discussion of this important subject. Thanks!
No comments:
Post a Comment
In addition to my life-long love for the subjects which I cover in the posts of this blog, I have long held the belief that we can disagree without becoming disagreeable. Differences of opinion are natural, while being disagreeable in expressing those differences is not. And in that sense, I have no desire to close the door on anyone who earnestly desires to contribute to the ongoing dialogue on subjects covered in the posts on this blog.
At the same time, however, I recognize that we live in a time when incivility, discourtesy, unkindness, and even cyber-bullying has regrettably become part of online interactions. With that in mind, while anyone who wishes can comment on anything if they choose to do so, I hereby reserve the right to immediately delete any comments which are critical, unkind, lack civility, or promote prodcuts, services, and values contrary to either the Church, or to the rules of online etiquette.
I'd also like to remind all who comment here that I try to respond personally to each individual comment as I feel is appropriate. Such replies are not meant to end the conversation, but to acknowledge earnest feedback as it is submitted.
And in order to better preserve the spirit and pure intentions for which this blog was established, I also hereby request that anyone not commenting with a regular user name (particularly those whose comments appear under the "Unknown" or "Anonymous" monikers, give the rest of us a name to work with in addressing any replies. If such individuals do not wish to disclose their actual given names, a pseudonym or nickname would suffice.
Any comments made by individuals who opt to not give a name by which they can ber identified may, depending on the substance and tone of such comments, be subject to deletion as well. I would respectfully ask that all of us do all we can to keep the dialogue positive, polite, and without malice or ill-will. May the Lord bless us all in our discussion of these important matters.