While it took a while for Matthew Martinich, who is considered somewhat of an authority on the subject of Church growth, to post for the first time this year, he has done one or two most interesting ones within the last month. And the most intriguing thing about following those ongoing posts is the ensuing discussions that have taken place in the comments responding to the post topics. This one highlights the first units created in 2017, and includes an ongoing discussion on the subject of mission president assignments, particularly those that have been filled by General Authorities and the husbands of the general officers of the Church.
This one includes a link to the monthly newsletter of cumorah.com, a neighboring site maintained by Matt that highlights the growth and progress of the Church in various nations and countries of the world. This one highlights an apology from Matt that I feel is unnecessary, but which he did in reporting that his previous post about the imminent creation of the Church's first stake in Belize was proven to be in error.
This one focused on Church-related growth and developments in and around the region of Kurdistan Iraq. As is all too common in posts on Matt's blog, the conversation branched off to many other topics.
But when the conversation came back around to Kurdistan, a church service missionary felt to point out to Matt how wrong she thought his post was in terms what what he had indicated. After reading her comment, I felt somewhat conflicted, on the one hand feeling defensive of Matt, whose information has been proven to be reliable for the most part, even though it was not uncommon to have him retract or clarify information on his blog when that becomes necessary. On the other hand, I was intrigued by what the sister service missionary shared about the actual developments she had witnessed firsthand. The next comment, which proved to be the last, was from Matt himself, who thanked her for the clarification and told her why he had written what he had written. This seemed to smooth things over well enough, for which I was very glad.
In the meantime, there was also one other post Matt did just before Christmas of which I wanted to make mention. He talked about how Nigeria had reached the landmark milestone of 500 wards and branches. The ensuing discussion is interesting. Click here to read both the post itself and the discussion that followed.
Interesting stuff as always! Enjoy! And, as always, any comments on Matt's blog posts of which I have made mention should be made at the location of the original posts. Thanks.
Friday, January 13, 2017
Interesting posts and comment threads on Matthew Martinich's Church Growth Blog
I have had a lifelong love for Church history, which has extended to ongoing reports of the ministry of our apostles and prophets, General Conference, and all temple developments. This blog enables me to share that love with all who read my thoughts on these developments, which are sometimes reported multiple times per day as needed.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment
In addition to my life-long love for the subjects which I cover in the posts of this blog, I have long held the belief that we can disagree without becoming disagreeable. Differences of opinion are natural, while being disagreeable in expressing those differences is not. And in that sense, I have no desire to close the door on anyone who earnestly desires to contribute to the ongoing dialogue on subjects covered in the posts on this blog.
At the same time, however, I recognize that we live in a time when incivility, discourtesy, unkindness, and even cyber-bullying has regrettably become part of online interactions. With that in mind, while anyone who wishes can comment on anything if they choose to do so, I hereby reserve the right to immediately delete any comments which are critical, unkind, lack civility, or promote prodcuts, services, and values contrary to either the Church, or to the rules of online etiquette.
I'd also like to remind all who comment here that I try to respond personally to each individual comment as I feel is appropriate. Such replies are not meant to end the conversation, but to acknowledge earnest feedback as it is submitted.
And in order to better preserve the spirit and pure intentions for which this blog was established, I also hereby request that anyone not commenting with a regular user name (particularly those whose comments appear under the "Unknown" or "Anonymous" monikers, give the rest of us a name to work with in addressing any replies. If such individuals do not wish to disclose their actual given names, a pseudonym or nickname would suffice.
Any comments made by individuals who opt to not give a name by which they can ber identified may, depending on the substance and tone of such comments, be subject to deletion as well. I would respectfully ask that all of us do all we can to keep the dialogue positive, polite, and without malice or ill-will. May the Lord bless us all in our discussion of these important matters.