Stokes Sounds Off: Article About Probable Location for the Pocatello Idaho Temple/Further Changes Made to the Announced Temples Section of My Report

Search This Blog

Top Leaderboard

Friday, November 10, 2017

Article About Probable Location for the Pocatello Idaho Temple/Further Changes Made to the Announced Temples Section of My Report

Hello again, everyone! Within the last few days, an Idaho news organization ran an article stating that, the Church could still opt to use any one of currently three sites that have been mentioned as potential locations for the Pocatello Idaho Temple, it appears that the location annexed into Pocatello City two days following the long-awaited announcement of that temple may be the best option. Of course, nothing is official until the Brethren make it so, but I thought that was worth mentioning. You can read more about that here. Because it is very likely that will be the location, and also because I needed to do so, I have again revisited the order in which I have listed announced temples on my temple construction progress report. A copy of those changes follows. That does it for this post. Any comments are, as always, welcome and appreciated. Thank you for the privilege of your time. Until my next post, I wish each one of you all the best and pray that the Lord will bless each one of you in all that you do.

NOTE ON ANNOUNCED TEMPLES: While I once felt confident in projecting potential groundbreaking estimates for these announced temples, on October 28, 2017, I determined that it would be best to simplify this section by listing these temples in their announced order, with the exception of those that are farther along. Then on November 10, 2017, I took another look at new information on these temples and reordered them further. I will keep an eye out for any developments and reorder this list again as often as that becomes necessary going forward. Additionally, where I have felt it would be appropriate, I have provided notes about some of the factors that may affect how soon future groundbreakings will occur. Since we already know that 2018-2020 are going to be busy years for temple-related developments, it would not surprise me at all if, in view of Elder Wilson’s statement referenced above, we have at least ten more announced during that same time, nor would it surprise me if many of the temples in this section progress to a groundbreaking (and perhaps even a dedication) during that time as well. I am keeping an eye on all of this and will let you know once I find out more information.

Announced temples:
171. Lima Peru Los Olivos Temple: Planning and preliminary construction phase; awaiting official site announcement.
NOTE: As previously noted, the contractor for this temple said that a year of preliminary work would be needed prior to this temple’s groundbreaking. If, as previously indicated, that year began in March 2017, this temple could easily have its groundbreaking in the early-to-middle part of next year.
172. Brasilia Brazil Temple: Planning and approval; site inspected by Church engineers on June 21, 2017.
NOTE: This temple is this far up on the list because it has had a site identified and inspected. How soon a groundbreaking might happen is unclear. But since a site has been identified and inspected, it may be sooner rather than later.
173. Greater Manila Philippines Temple: Planning and approval; awaiting official name announcement.
NOTE: As with the Brasilia temple, this temple is in this position on this list because a site has been identified. An official name is anticipated to be announced for this temple at some point in the near future. How soon a groundbreaking might happen is anyone’s guess. But with a site identified already, it may be sooner rather than later/
174. Pocatello Idaho Temple: Planning and approval; probability increases for likely temple site; official confirmation is pending.
NOTE: On November 10, I received word of additional evidence that is indicative that the land annexed into Pocatello two days after its April 2017 announcement would indeed be the location for the temple.  I am keeping my eye on all of this and will continue to pass along any and all updates as I make them.
175. Bangkok Thailand Temple: Planning and approval; awaiting official site announcement.
NOTE: If, as some members have speculated, an existing Church office building is reconstructed into a multi-purpose building that will serve as not only an office building, but a chapel and the temple as well, and if that is confirmed, we could easily see a groundbreaking for this temple sooner rather than later.
176. Urdaneta Philippines Temple: Awaiting government approval and official site announcement.
NOTE: This temple, announced in October 2010, has been subjected to numerous delays. While I hope to see a groundbreaking for it sooner rather than later, there could be more delays in store for this temple. That said, the reports I have received indicate that a site announcement and groundbreaking could occur in short order next year. If that does happen, we could see a groundbreaking sooner rather than later.
177. Abidjan Ivory Coast Temple: Planning and approval; awaiting official site announcement.
178. Quito Ecuador Temple: Planning and approval; awaiting official site announcement.
NOTE: While the first Ecuadoran Temple had a 14-year waiting period between its announcement and its subsequent groundbreaking, this temple is not anticipated to take anywhere near that long between its 2016 announcement and whenever its groundbreaking occurs. As with everything else, I am keeping my eye out for devel
179. Harare Zimbabwe Temple: Planning and approval; awaiting official site announcement.
NOTE: Shortly after this temple was announced (in April 2016), Elder Kevin S. Hamilton, who presides over the Church in the Africa Southeast Area, stated that a site announcement and groundbreaking would occur in short order during 2017. Since that time, no progress has been made in that regard. Hopefully that will change soon.
180. Belem Brazil Temple: Planning and approval; awaiting official site announcement.
181. Nairobi Kenya Temple: Planning and approval; awaiting official site announcement; media event held June 14, 2017.
NOTE: While the media event is a good initial step for providing information on this temple, in his remarks at this event, Elder Sitati (our native Kenyan GA Seventy, who also has a role as an Assistant Executive Director of the Temple Department (both of which make it understandable that the Church would ask him to represent them for the event), Elder Sitati indicated that it usually takes the Church 2-3 years after an announcement to locate a suitable site (whether owned by the Church or not) plan and conduct a groundbreaking, and start the construction progress. With that in mind, it may be 2019 or 2020 before the groundbreaking occurs for this temple. I hope we will not have to wait that long to have all of that happen for this temple, but time will tell.
182. Saratoga Springs Utah Temple: Planning and approval; awaiting official site announcement.
NOTE: Though Utah temples (particularly those in Utah County) have been known to have a site announcement, groundbreaking, and construction process much more quickly than temples elsewhere, until a site is announced, it has felt wise to have this temple at this spot on this list. As soon as anything changes in that regard, I will pass such news along.

ADDITIONAL GENERAL NOTE: As I have repeatedly emphasized, Elder Wilson stated in late April 2017 that the Church had a list of 80 potential temple sites that are under active consideration for a subsequent announcement during the 15 years following that statement.

Unless the First Presidency elects to do so between now and then, General Conference in April 2018 would be the next opportunity for such announcements. And though not all of the 80 currently on the list will go on to be announced within that time, and while others may be added to that list in the coming years, with 14 years remaining, if anywhere close to 80 temples are announced, that works out to around 6 new temples per year. I am keeping an eye on all of this, and will be sure to post any additional news once I hear of it.

7 comments:

  1. For Pocatello, the land adjacent to the possible temple site. Is being developed by Rick Satterfield of the ldschurchtemples website. That potential site appears to be in a highly visible site.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. The article referenced that side of things extensively. The one thing I want to be cautious about is that nothing is official until the Brethren make it so. Many sources I have seen, including the one cited in the source I mentioned, have been clear that, while the location in question is the most likely possibility, others may be under consideration. Some may not be as likely, but I like the fact that the coverage to which I have had access so far is not saying point blank that will be the location. Until the Brethren choose to make it official (which may happen sooner rather than later), there are a number of possibilities where the temple could be, even if most of them are currently not as likely as the main one discussed here. It will be interesting to see what happens in that regard, and as soon as anything official is announced, I will be sure to pass that along. Thanks for your comment, Chris!

      Delete
    2. Additionally, I just looked over the article in question again, and it would appear that the land development referenced in the article is being done by another Satterfield, Ryan. Just wanted to clarify that. But it is interesting that the land in question was annexed into Pocatello two days after the announcement of the temple last April. Depending on how soon the Church opts to announce the site, whether this one or one of the two or three others that have been mentioned could then go on to see a groundbreaking within the next two years or less. I have before offered my opinion (shared by others) that temples in the Mormon corridor of Idaho, Utah and Arizona always progress quickly. The Meridian Idaho temple will be dedicated within three years and three months of its groundbreaking. Cedar City took about 2 years and 4 months from groundbreaking to its December dedication. And the Tucson Arizona Temple, dedicated in August, took 1 year and 10 months. All told, Tucson took just under 5 years, Meridian just around 6 years and 7 months, and Cedar City will have taken around 4 years and 8 months, those periods taking each of those temples from announcement to dedication. So I can see why so many are saying that the site announcements and groundbreakings for the newest Utah and Idaho Temples will be just a matter of time. It will be neat to see. How wonderful it is to think about temples everywhere. Thanks again.

      Delete
    3. I understand that templeRick is part of the same family. They have a family own real estate company.

      Delete
    4. Fair point, Chris. Thanks for that observation. I know that many locations have been mentioned as potential sites for this temple. It is nice to have independently sourced confirmation of this most likely location. Of course, it will be up to the Brethren to confirm or deny that this will be the location, but it is looking more likely, which means, if confirmed, it could have a groundbreaking within the next 2-3 years or less. Whatever happens, you can depend on my passing that along.

      Delete
  2. Ryan is my second cousin. His dad and my dad are cousins, and they worked together for several decades under the Satterfield Realty and Development organization. Today, Ryan runs that business on his own, and my side of the family no longer has any association with it. My dad and brother are real estate agents with RE/MAX, and I work for the City of Pocatello. My dad did work with the Church representatives who came in the late 90s when they first acquired property for the temple.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Thank you for that clarification, Rick! I appreciate it. Interesting information.It will be interesting to see what happens with the different sites I have heard mentioned in a variety of sources. I know that, whenever temple possibilities have been mentioned, particularly in the Mormon corridor, a wide variety of sources have claimed a wide variety of potential sites, and Pocatello is no different. This independent news report would seem to define the most likely location, but nothing is official until it is confirmed by those whose right it is to do so. I know that for me, I have locations I would consider as prime for a temple that others might not be considering. The process that unfolds for establishing temples anywhere has fascinated me for years, and that is one of many reasons I have been so anxious to pass along news here as I hear of it. The information age is at once advantageous and a disadvantage because such news can easily be passed along, but whether or not such news is accurate is sometimes a big question mark. The thing I am most excited to see is how soon the newest US temples get underway. Pocatello and Saratoga Springs interest me in particular because Pocatello was on my list for a year or so prior to its announcement, and my father-in-law (who lives in Lehi and is in our previous temple district) will likely be part of the new Saratoga Springs district. It is pretty amazing to see this process unfold. Thanks again for your comment, Rick!

      Delete

In addition to my life-long love for the subjects which I cover in the posts of this blog, I have long held the belief that we can disagree without becoming disagreeable. Differences of opinion are natural, while being disagreeable in expressing those differences is not. And in that sense, I have no desire to close the door on anyone who earnestly desires to contribute to the ongoing dialogue on subjects covered in the posts on this blog.

At the same time, however, I recognize that we live in a time when incivility, discourtesy, unkindness, and even cyber-bullying has regrettably become part of online interactions. With that in mind, while anyone who wishes can comment on anything if they choose to do so, I hereby reserve the right to immediately delete any comments which are critical, unkind, lack civility, or promote prodcuts, services, and values contrary to either the Church, or to the rules of online etiquette.

I'd also like to remind all who comment here that I try to respond personally to each individual comment as I feel is appropriate. Such replies are not meant to end the conversation, but to acknowledge earnest feedback as it is submitted.

And in order to better preserve the spirit and pure intentions for which this blog was established, I also hereby request that anyone not commenting with a regular user name (particularly those whose comments appear under the "Unknown" or "Anonymous" monikers, give the rest of us a name to work with in addressing any replies. If such individuals do not wish to disclose their actual given names, a pseudonym or nickname would suffice.

Any comments made by individuals who opt to not give a name by which they can ber identified may, depending on the substance and tone of such comments, be subject to deletion as well. I would respectfully ask that all of us do all we can to keep the dialogue positive, polite, and without malice or ill-will. May the Lord bless us all in our discussion of these important matters.