Stokes Sounds Off: Latest Apostolic Statistics: Part Two--Updated Ages & Other Important Information

Search This Blog

Leaderboard

Sunday, September 23, 2018

Latest Apostolic Statistics: Part Two--Updated Ages & Other Important Information

Hello again, everyone! Having set the stage in the first part of this apostolic age update (posted just a few moments ago), we now move on to talk specifics regarding the long-form and decimal ages of our current apostles, which will also include updated information on the average ages of the First Presidency, Quorum of the Twelve Apostles, and the 15 apostles as a group, and current and future nonagenarians. So let’s get right into all of that. Again, all data is current as of today (Sunday September 23, 2018).

First, I thought it might be appropriate to share an overview of the apostolic birthdays that are coming up in the near future, particularly those which will be observed before I post the next such update, which I will try to do in 6-weeks’ time (around November 4). We have two apostolic birthdays coming up before then. The first will be the 60th birthday of our youngest apostle, Elder Ulisses Soares, which he will be observing on October 2. Then, as noted towards the end of my last post, President M. Russell Ballard’s 90th birthday will be observed 6 days later, on October 8. Just by way of reminder, we have two apostles each observing their birthdays in November (Elder Dieter F. Uchtdorf’s 78th on the 6th, and Elder Dale G. Renlund’s 66th exactly one week later), while Elders Jeffrey R. Holland and Gerrit W. Gong will observe their respective 78th and 65th birthdays on the 3rd and 23rd of December respectively.

With that noted, we now move on to some exact figures about the ages (and average ages) of the First Presidency, Quorum of the Twelve Apostles, and all 15 apostles as a group. For the First Presidency, President Russell M. Nelson’s long-form age is now 94 years, 0 months, and 14 days, which works out to 94.04 decimal years. President Dallin H. Oaks has reached the age of 86 years, 1 month, and 11 days, which is 86.12 years. President Henry B. Eyring, who, as previously noted, is almost always 0.8 years younger than President Oaks, is now 85 years, 3 months, and 23 days old, which puts him at a decimal age of 85.32 years.

The three Presiding High Priests now have a combined 265.48 years of life experience, which puts their average age at 88.49 years as of today. President Oaks remains closest to that average, still being 2.37 years below it. Obviously, Presidents Nelson and Eyring are still respectively above and below the average.

We move on now to the Quorum of the Twelve Apostles. First, President Ballard, whose 90th birthday is, as noted, 15 days away, has a long-form age of 89 years, 11 months, and 15 days old, with a decimal age of 89.96 years. Elder Holland is now 77 years, 9 months, and 20 days old, which puts his decimal age at 77.81 years. Elder Uchtdorf, at just under a month older than Elder Holland, is now 77 years, 10 months, and 17 days old, making him 77.88 in decimal years.

Elder Bednar has a long-form age of 66 years, 3 months, and 8 days, with a decimal age of 66.27 years.  Elder Cook, who also observed a birthday since my last update, is 78 years, 0 months, and 15 days old, making his decimal age 78.04 years. Elder Christofferson is now 73 years, 7 months, and 30 days old, which works out to 73.66 years.

Elder Andersen is now 67 years, 1 month, and 14 days old, which puts his decimal age at 67.12 years. Elder Rasband’s long-form age is 67 years, 7 months, and 17 days, with a decimal age of 67.63 years. Elder Gary E. Stevenson, who was the youngest apostle currently serving until last April, is now 63 years, 1 month, and 17 days old, which is 63.13 in decimal years.

We now come to the final three apostles. Elder Renlund now has a long-form age of 65 years, 10 months, and 10 days old, which is 65.86 years. Elder Gong is now exactly 64 years and 9 months old, with a resulting decimal age of 64.75 years.  Elder Soares, whose 60th birthday is coming up, as noted earlier, on October 2, is now 59 years, 11 months, and 21 days old, with a resulting decimal age of 59.98 years.

The current members of the Quorum of the Twelve Apostles have a combined life experience of 852.09 years, which averages out to 71.01 years for each of those 12 Brethren. As I noted previously, the ages of Elders Christofferson and Rasband put them above and below that average respectively, with Elder Christofferson now being 2.65 years older and Elder Rasband remaining roughly 3.38 years younger.

Based on the information I provided earlier about the members of the First Presidency, the 15 apostles have a combined 1117.57 years of life experience, which averages out to 74.5 years. Elders Holland and Christofferson stand closest to that average, with the former being 3.31 years older, and the latter remaining 0.84 years younger.

We now move on to the nonagenarians. President Nelson remains the 7th oldest apostle in Church history, and now has just over 9 months before he will move up on that list. President Ballard will join that list in just 15 days. This means that by the time I post these statistics again, not only will President Ballard have joined the list of nonagenarians, but he will be 10 days away from when he will first move up on it.  While 12 other apostles will join the list at various intervals, Elder Soares now has 30 years and 9 days until his 90th birthday.

I continue to track all of this information, and will do my level best to pass updates on to you regularly, with my hope being to post the next such update roughly 6 weeks from now, which I hope to continue to do for the foreseeable future. That does it for this post. Any and all comments are, as always, welcome and appreciated on any post at any time. Thank you for the privilege of your time.

If you enjoyed what you read here and would like to stay informed of newly-added content, please feel free to subscribe. Until my next post, I wish each one of you all the best, and pray that the Lord will bless you all in everything you do.

6 comments:

  1. This comment has been removed by the author.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies

    1. It appears that the temple in Ivory Coast will be ground broken in November.

      Delete
  2. The members on Facebook who are reporting the news of the Abidjan temple groundbreaking say that emails have been sent out to local leaders. I imagine we should see something official soon, perhaps even today or in the coming days.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Hello, Chris and Eric! I happened upon this news on the Church Temples Facebook page not long after you both posted about it here. I am sure that if a letter has been sent out to African leaders, and if several African members have reported on this development, it is almost certain to be confirmed by official announcement sooner rather than later.

    That said, since we have had no official announcement on any official source (the Church News, the News & Events and English Newsroom, and the French version of the Ivory Coast Newsroom), I am taking this news with a grain of salt for now. But if confirmation comes of this news within the next week or less, it will be a very surprising development.

    I would imagine that means that the Abidjan Temple will be another smaller one, and that that temple will join the one in Bangkok as being the two that will have a groundbreaking by the end of this year.

    And that would be a good thing because those are the remaining two temples announced in April 2015 which have not had a groundbreaking. That would trim the backlog to 17 temples, and would mean that just the Urdaneta Philippines Temple, the 4 announced in 2016, the 5 announced in 2017, and the 8 announced last April would be left.

    But, perhaps more significantly, this opens the prospect that other temples could potentially have a groundbreaking within the last three months of this year. It will be interesting to see what occurs in that regard. Thanks again, Eric and Chris, for taking time to comment.

    ReplyDelete
  4. Also Rick's Temple site should be back up and running this weekend.

    ReplyDelete
  5. Thank you, Chris! I was aware of the date indicated in which it was projected that the site would be back up and running. That said, due to the nature of the data loss involved, I understand that the goal is to get the most crucial parts of the site back up and running by that date. Getting the entire site back to where it was may be a longer process. At least, that is what I gather from the information I have available. Either way, I look forward to being able to have that as a resource again. Thanks, Chris, for this additional comment.

    ReplyDelete

In addition to my life-long love for the subjects which I cover in the posts of this blog, I have long held the belief that we can disagree without becoming disagreeable. Differences of opinion are natural, while being disagreeable in expressing those differences is not. And in that sense, I have no desire to close the door on anyone who earnestly desires to contribute to the ongoing dialogue on subjects covered in the posts on this blog.

At the same time, however, I recognize that we live in a time when incivility, discourtesy, unkindness, and even cyber-bullying has regrettably become part of online interactions. With that in mind, while anyone who wishes can comment on anything if they choose to do so, I hereby reserve the right to immediately delete any comments which are critical, unkind, lack civility, or promote prodcuts, services, and values contrary to either the Church, or to the rules of online etiquette.

I'd also like to remind all who comment here that I try to respond personally to each individual comment as I feel is appropriate. Such replies are not meant to end the conversation, but to acknowledge earnest feedback as it is submitted.

And in order to better preserve the spirit and pure intentions for which this blog was established, I also hereby request that anyone not commenting with a regular user name (particularly those whose comments appear under the "Unknown" or "Anonymous" monikers, give the rest of us a name to work with in addressing any replies. If such individuals do not wish to disclose their actual given names, a pseudonym or nickname would suffice.

Any comments made by individuals who opt to not give a name by which they can ber identified may, depending on the substance and tone of such comments, be subject to deletion as well. I would respectfully ask that all of us do all we can to keep the dialogue positive, polite, and without malice or ill-will. May the Lord bless us all in our discussion of these important matters.