Given the fact that the October 2018 General Conference is just over 3 months away, I want to revisit that series to discuss the most likely prospective locations that could be announced during that General Conference.
In kicking off this iteration of that series, I would hope that those of you who will read and participate in the discussion of the locations currently on my list will keep the following information in mind:
1. As it is next to impossible to identify every single location that may ever get a temple at any point, this series will focus on the most imminent prospects that seem most likely to be announced this October.
2. If a certain location seems to be missing from this list, it may either be on a second list, which I am holding in reserve for when the possibility of that location becomes more imminent, or may be on a third list of locations that may have a temple announced at some point, but may be more of a long-shot possibility.
3. If a location is mentioned that is not on any of the three lists I referenced above, that does not in any way mean it is out of the question, nor does it mean that (in my opinion), a temple in such locations will never be announced. The Lord reveals to His prophets where to announce and build His temples, and I embrace the news of all new temples whether or not they are on any of those three lists I am keeping. And since President Nelson already surprised most of us (including himself) with one or two of the locations he announced in April 2018, any location may be fair game.
4. For any comments made on the posts in this series, I may post responses to most (if not all) of them. This is not in any way meant to end or limit the discussion, but rather will constitute my efforts to acknowledge the feedback I receive, and will include any observations I have in response to those comments.
5. This series may be slightly different in content from the information I provided in the first edition of that series, primarily because, at the moment, some of the information I would ordinarily use (such as the current composition and size of the Church's temple districts) is currently unavailable to me.
6. While the prospects I will discuss this go-round are based on a few factors with which I have successfully predicted previous temple locations, I do not have the capability nor the time at present to consider every possible factor. Few if any lay Church members have a complete list of all criteria the Church and its' prophets use to make such determinations. That said, if there are any factors I have clearly overlooked or failed to consider when assembling the current list of locations, the order in which they are listed or in consideration of changes I should make to any of the three lists I referenced above, please let me know.
That said, let's dive into the current layout of my list, such as it is. You can find it below. So as not to disturb the flow of information within it, I will end here as I always do: That does it for this post. Any and all comments are, as always, welcome and appreciated. Thank you for the privilege of your time. Until my next post, I wish each one of you all the best and pray that the Lord will bless you all in everything you do.
Temple Predictions: 3+ temples announced, with the most likely locations (in my opinion), on the list below.
Preliminary note: With seven temples having been
announced last April (the second-highest number of temples ever announced at
once), it may be that President Nelson will opt to wait until April 2019 to
announce any others. But in view of President Nelson’s expressed intention to
continue to bring temples to the people, there may be at least a few announced
during this conference. The locations listed below represent my best efforts to
anticipate such announcements, and I have requested feedback on this list on my
blog. The Lord can and does continue to inspire temple announcements in the
right locations at the right time, and if any new temples are announced, I will
be just as happy if none of them are for the locations listed below as I will
be if any or all of the temples that are announced are for locations on this
list. Also, as I prepared to request initial feedback for the locations on this
list, it made more sense to me to once again group the locations on this list
by the geographical area under which they fall, then by potential likelihood
within those areas.
Asia: Phnom Penh Cambodia[vii]
Brazil: Belo Horizonte/Salvador[viii]
Caribbean: San Juan Puerto Rico[ix]
Mexico: Puebla Mexico[xvi]
United States[xxi]
North America Southwest: Bentonville Arkansas[xxvi];
Elko[xxvii]/Ely[xxviii]
Nevada; Fort Worth Texas[xxix];
Las Cruces New Mexico[xxx];
Flagstaff Arizona[xxxi]
Utah Salt Lake City: Herriman[xxxii];
[i]The African continent is
experiencing substantial and significant growth. That has proven particularly
true for the this area of the Church, in which 1 temple is currently operating,
but 4 others have been announced (2 of which are under construction, and the
other 2 of which are anticipated to start construction at some point within the
next 3 years or less.
[ii]Since Madagascar is
disconnected from the rest of the African continent, anywhere in Africa to
which the Saints might journey will be somewhat of a challenge for those in
Madagascar. For that reason, I have added Antananarivo to this list for the
first time. Madagascar is currently the last of the top ten nations with the
strongest Church presence that does not have a temple in any phase, which adds
to the rationale for building a temple there. The only other African nation
within this area that is in the top ten is Uganda at #6 on that list. But since
a temple has been announced for the neighboring nation of Kenya, Uganda may not
get a temple until the one in Kenya is either under construction or dedicated,
as the Church will probably want to gauge how busy the temple in Kenya is
before announcing one for Uganda. Thus, Madagascar is the only prospect on this
list for this area.
[iii]The Church in the Africa
West Area has also experienced massive and rapid growth. The LDS Church Growth
Blog recently reported that, if current growth trends in the Africa West Area continue
as they have been, the Church could go from the 2 operating and 1 announced
temple to 13 in operation by sometime during 2030. With that in mind, several
possibilities have a lot of merit to the rationale behind my belief that they
could each get a temple in the near future, as I will explain in the subsequent
references for the locations I have listed for this area.
[iv]Sierra Leone is now the
fourth of the top ten nations that have the strongest Church presence but do
not yet have a temple in any phase. With the recent expanded growth in Sierra
Leone (particularly with so many districts that have been upgraded to a stake),
a temple there may simply be a matter of time.
[v]Since the dedication of the
Accra Ghana temple in January 2004, Ghana has seen sufficient enough growth (in
my opinion) to potentially get a second temple. And Kumasi has emerged as the
most likely city for such a temple.
[vi]Since the dedication of
the Aba Nigeria temple in August 2005, Nigeria has seen extensive Church
growth. While many have offered their opinions that Benin City might be a more
likely prospect, the elements I have studied leads me to conclude that when
Nigeria gets a second temple, it will likely be in Lagos.
[vii]Cambodia is now the
seventh of the top ten nations having the strongest Church presence without a
temple in any phase. So the idea of a temple in Phnom Penh makes sense. But
with the Bangkok Thailand Temple planned to be on the larger side, and with
another temple announced for Bengaluru India, the question will be whether a
temple might be needed in Cambodia as well in the near future. For now, I am
confident enough to include it here, but that could change.
[viii]Brazil has also seen
extensive Church growth, and rapid expansion. With temples currently under
construction in Fortaleza (which is anticipated to be dedicated in 2019) and in
Rio de Janeiro (which is anticipated to be dedicated in 2020), and with two
others announced (for Brasilia and Belem, both of which may be under
construction within the next few years), it is not hard to believe that
additional Brazilian temples may be needed. Salvador and Belo Horizonte seem to
be the cities most mentioned as having the best prospects for a temple
announcement in the near future. Of the two, a temple in Salvador seems to be
more imminently likely, but we have seen unexpected things occur, so for now,
both locations are on my list.
[ix]Puerto Rico now ranks as
the second of the top ten nations with the strongest Church presence that does
not have a temple in any phase. And now that the construction of the
Port-au-Prince Haiti Temple is underway, and since that temple is on the
smaller side, it makes sense that the Church might opt to announce a temple for
San Juan in the near future. Time will tell how safe it is to so assume, but
for now, it has made my list.
[x]With a temple having been
announced in April for Managua Nicaragua, it may be some time before we hear of
other temples being announced for the Central America Area of the Church. The
case in favor of the locations on my list being announced is a strong one, so
for that reason, they have made the list, but it would not surprise me in any
way if the Church waits on these potential locations until the temple in
Managua is further along.
[xi]The Church in Honduras has
seen extensive growth in recent years, so a third temple in that nation seems
likely. And while there may be many good potential locations where one could be
built, the consensus appears to be that San Pedro Sula is the most likely
prospect, and that a temple for that city could be announced sooner rather than
later.
[xii]As noted above in
relation to Honduras, Guatemala has also seen significant Church growth in
recent years. And there are likewise many potential locations where a third
temple could be built to serve the Guatemalan Saints. But the city of Senahu
has emerged as the most likely prospect for that honor, and the consensus seems
to be that a temple there may simply be a matter of time.
[xiii]Europe, particularly in
the eastern countries of its’ continent, has seen some stagnation in terms of
the growth of the Church. With temples currently under construction in Rome
Italy and Lisbon Portugal, and another announced for a major yet-to-be
determined city in Russia, the Church may opt to wait to construct other temples
on the European continent until those 3 are either dedicated or at least
further along in the process. That said, on the off-chance the Church does not
so opt, the cities in this section, for the reasons I will explain in the
subsequent notes that will follow this one, have the greatest chance of being
announced in the near future.
[xiv]When I began sharing my
thoughts on potential future temple locations, someone who has knowledge of the
growth of the Church in Europe indicated that Budapest would likely be the next
European city to get a temple. My study on the matter confirms that opinion, so
it has been on my list for a while.
[xv]Cape Verde now ranks as
the eighth of the top ten nations with the strongest Church presence that does
not have a temple. Based on that fact, a temple in Praia is likely just a
matter of time.
[xvi]The growth of the Church
in Mexico has somewhat stagnated to the point where Church leaders began last
year to do a mass consolidation of the Church units there. That said, many
people (including one of the readers of my blog who lives in Mexico) concur
that the next temple in Mexico will likely be in Puebla, and that such a temple
will likely be announced sooner rather than later.
[xvii]Papua New Guinea now
ranks as the nation with the strongest Church presence that does not yet have a
temple. I also learned several years ago that land has been held in reserve in
Port Moresby for a temple for a while now. With that in mind, it may simply be
a matter of time before a temple is announced there.
[xviii]As with Papua New
Guinea, I had heard years ago that land has been held in reserve in Auckland
for a temple. How soon that might actually occur will depend on if the
renovation of the Hamilton New Zealand Temple involves any kind of expansion
for that temple. If it does, that might potentially eliminate the immediate
need to use the land in Auckland. I have felt confident enough to keep it on my
list for now, but will be watching for any developments that could change my
mind.
[xix]The entire South American
continent has seen extensive growth, as manifested by the fact that, of the 19
temples currently announced, 5 of them are in South American nations. And of
the 11 temples currently under construction, Brazil has 2 (with two others
announced), this area (South America Northwest) has 2 under construction (1 of
which has a dedication announced), and 2 others announced, and the South
America South area has 1 temple announced, 1 with a dedication scheduled, and 1
that is currently closed for renovation. Based on these numbers, the Church may
opt to wait until all temples under construction or being renovated are
finished, or Church leaders could (and in my opinion, likely will) opt to
announce more temples as they are needed. In a previous note above, I shared my
rationale behind two temple locations that may be used for future Brazilian
Temples. While the Church could surprise us and announce other temples for the
South America South Area (which would not be unheard of by any means), it is my
feeling that the most likely prospect for South American temples in the near
future is this area, for the reasons I will explain in the notes below.
[xx]Since the dedication of
Bolivia’s first temple in Cochabamba, the Church in Bolivia has seen
significant growth and expansion. That has been especially true of regions that
would be served by temples in Santa Cruz or La Paz. Of the two, although I
favor La Paz (since a good friend served a mission there), my research
indicates a Santa Cruz temple may be more imminent. But I fully anticipate
temples in both cities within the next 15 years or less, thus both are on this
list.
[xxi]While it has been
repeatedly observed that the growth of the Church has stagnated somewhat here
in the United States, 4 of the 19 temples that have currently not had a
groundbreaking were for the United States. This gives me hope, however slight
that hope might be, that other locations within the US that have a compelling
case in their favor for a temple (as outlined in the remaining notes). While
there are literally hundreds of these potential locations with a strong
likelihood, the locations on this list are those that, in my opinion and for
the reasons outlined, have the highest likelihood.
[xxii]According to reports I
received through the comments on my blog, Elder David A. Bednar publicly
proposed a Missoula Montana Temple while on assignment to a stake conference in
that city. My subsequent research indicates that land has been held in reserve
for such a temple for several years now, and that an official announcement will
occur once the right conditions are met. For that reason, Missoula has been on
my list for a while now, and I could see an official announcement in the near
future.
[xxiii]Although South Dakota
only has 2 stakes and one district, and although the districts of the Bismarck
North Dakota and Winter Quarters Nebraska, which cover South Dakota, may not be
inordinately large, the Saints in Rapid City travel almost 300 miles to worship
at the Bismarck temple, so it seems likely that the Church will opt to build a
temple there sooner rather than later.
[xxiv]Mississippi is one of
the few states in the US that does not have a temple in any phase. My recent
study points to the idea that a temple in Jackson may just be a matter of time.
[xxv]The Saints in Shreveport
currently travel just under 200 miles to their assigned temple in Dallas, but I
have still felt confident enough that this city could get a temple sooner
rather than later.
[xxvi]A good friend with
connections to Arkansas told me a while ago that the Church has held land in
reserve for a temple in Bentonville for a while now, and that an official
announcement was likely once the right conditions were met. For that reason, I
believe we will see this temple announced sooner rather than later. Some have
opined that Rogers might be a more likely location for the first temple in
Arkansas, but my study confirms that a temple is likely in Bentonville sooner
rather than later.
[xxvii]The Saints in Elko
currently travel just over 200 miles to their assigned temple (Salt Lake). It
is enough of a commute that a temple there may just be a matter of time.
[xxviii]The note above applies
to the Saints in Ely as well, as they commute just over 200 miles, but their
assigned temple is in Cedar City. A temple in Ely would cut the commute
substantially. And I fully believe that temples in both Elko and Ely are
possible in the near future, since the distance between the two is just under
200 miles.
[xxix]In sharing my thoughts
about potential future temple locations, I learned from someone living in Texas
that Fort Worth would likely be the best prospective city for the next temple
in Texas, and a temple there would be the best way to break up the current
Dallas Texas district.
[xxx]The Saints in Las Cruces
currently travel 224.6 miles to the temple in Albuquerque, so a temple there
may just be a matter of time. A temple in that city could also likely serve the
Saints in El Paso Texas, if they are unable to access their currently assigned
temple (in Ciudad Juarez Mexico).
[xxxi]At the dedication of the
Tucson Arizona Temple, Elder Larry Y. Wilson, who serves as the Executive
Director of the Temple Department, stated that that dedication had Arizona
pretty well covered for temples. But I have heard from many sources that
Flagstaff will likely be the next Arizona city to get a temple, and that this
could happen sooner rather than later. Thus, I am confident enough to put it on
my list.
[xxxii]In 2005, President
Gordon B. Hinckley noted that land was being held in reserve for a temple in
the Southwestern Salt Lake Valley, which would have an official announcement
when that became necessary. Subsequent study on my part in late 2017 and early
2018 pointed me to the conclusion that the land in question was in Bluffdale,
but that it has since been annexed into the city of Herriman, although it has
been the subject of more than a few border disputes. I am confident enough to
list it here, and since President Monson announced temples publicly proposed
during President Hinckley’s tenure, I feel that President Nelson may likely do
the same. Thus, a temple there may just be a matter of time.
[xxxiii]A temple in Heber City
(the prospect of which has been suggested a few times) would help provide a
closer option for Saints in the Heber Valley, and it would likely split the
district of the Provo Utah Temple, which, by all reports, is still one of the
busiest in the Church.
[xxxiv]Tooele has also been
mentioned repeatedly as a potential prospective city for a temple. While the
Saints in Tooele do not have to drive an inordinate distance to reach their
assigned temple in Salt Lake City, I feel a temple there may simply be a matter
of time. And since a temple in Herriman would still create a drive (along a
U-shape) for those Saints, it seems safe to assume that Tooele could (and
likely will) get a temple soon.
