Stokes Sounds Off: 8 New Temple Presidents Announced; Additional Temple Updates Reported

Search This Blog

Leaderboard

Thursday, May 2, 2019

8 New Temple Presidents Announced; Additional Temple Updates Reported

Hello again, everyone! The Church News has continued to share biographies of new temple presidents called by the First Presidency who will begin serving later this year, with a new article sharing biographies of 8 others called to so serve. All of the temples which received new presidents with this announcement were on my list.

Among the newest batch of those called are: 1 former area seventy, 1 current counselor in the presidency of the temple for which he will assume oversight, 1 former counselor in the presidency of the same temple for which he will assume oversight, 1 current mission president, and several who are currently ordinance workers and/or current or former stake presidents and bishops.

With these newly-called temple presidents, the total number of those called to serve this year thus far has gone up to 49. and in addition to the 4 new temples that will be dedicated within the next year, there are 19 other temples left on my personal list of those that are most likely to have a new president called this year. An updated copy of that list follows below.

New presidents have been called for the following temples:
1.      Copenhagen Denmark
2.      Manila Philippines (not anticipated; current president has only served for two years)
3.      Tampico Mexico
4.      Philadelphia Pennsylvania
5.      Spokane Washington
6.      Manhattan New York
7.      Columbia River Washington
8.      St. Paul Minnesota
9.      Jordan River Utah
10.  Medford Oregon
11.  Rexburg Idaho
12.  Provo Utah
13.  London England
14.  Tegucigalpa Honduras (not anticipated; current president has only served for one year)
15.  Johannesburg South Africa
16.  Fort Collins Colorado
17.  Panama City Panama
18.  Nauvoo Illinois
19.  Suva Fiji (not anticipated; current president has only served for one year)
20.  Paris France (not anticipated; current president has only served for two years)
21.  Dallas Texas
22.  Guadalajara Mexico
23.  Gilbert Arizona
24.  Detroit Michigan
25.  Anchorage Alaska
26.  Twin Falls Idaho
27.  Sapporo Japan
28.  Kyiv Ukraine
29.  Columbus Ohio
30.  Calgary Alberta (not anticipated; current president has only served for two years)
31.  Tuxtla Gutierrez Mexico
32.  Ciudad Juarez Mexico
33.  Monterrey Mexico
34.  Idaho Falls Idaho
35.  Orlando Florida
36.  Halifax Nova Scotia
37.  Mexico City Mexico
38.  Santiago Chile
39.  Nashville Tennessee
40.  Merida Mexico
41.  Star Valley Wyoming
42.  Winter Quarters Nebraska
43.  Portland Oregon
44.  Montreal Quebec
45.  Santo Domingo Dominican Republic
46.  Seattle Washington
47.  Campinas Brazil
48.  Perth Australia
49.  Curitiba Brazil


The first presidents will likely be announced for the following new temples:
1.      Arequipa Peru
2.      Rio de Janeiro Brazil
3.      Winnipeg Manitoba
4.      Abidjan Côte d'Ivoire

List of currently-operating temples which may be getting a new president in 2019:
1.      Aba Nigeria
2.      Birmingham Alabama
3.      Chicago Illinois
4.      Cochabamba Bolivia
5.      Fresno California
6.      Hamilton New Zealand (Note: It is possible that the Church could hold off on calling a new president for this temple until its’ rededication is held in 2021)
7.      Hartford Connecticut
8.      Hong Kong China (Note: It is possible that the Church could hold off on calling a new president for this temple until its’ rededication in 2021 or 2022)
9.      Lima Peru
10.  Melbourne Australia
11.  Memphis Tennessee (Note: Since the current president of this temple had his service interrupted by its’ renovation, the Church could hold off another year or two on replacing him.)
12.  Nuku’alofa Tonga
13.  Oklahoma City Oklahoma (Note: Since the current president of this temple had his service interrupted by its’ renovation, the Church could hold off another year or two on replacing him.)
14.  Raleigh North Carolina (Note: Since the current president of this temple had his service interrupted by its’ renovation, the Church could hold off another year or two on replacing him.)
15.  Reno Nevada
16.  Seoul Korea
17.  St. George Utah (Note: Since this temple is scheduled to close for renovation later this year, the Church could hold off on calling a new president until the renovation is complete)
18.  Veracruz Mexico
19.  Washington D.C. (Note: Since the current president of this temple had his service interrupted by its’ renovation, the Church could hold off another year or two on replacing him.)


I would have ended my post before including that list, but I have some temple updates to share as well. First, new information received today indicates that the completion of the Durban South Africa Temple is now anticipated to occur in either late 2019 or early 2020, and the completion of the Rio de Janeiro Brazil Temple has now been pushed back to early 2020.  For the Yigo Guam, Praia Cabo Verde, San Juan Puerto Rico, and Quito Ecuador Temples, the temple sites have been officially cleared for their groundbreaking ceremonies.

And at the Lima Peru Los Olivos Temple site, the demolition of the institute building and meetinghouse is nearing completion as well. As for temples undergoing renovation, new information on the Raleigh North Carolina and Baton Rouge Louisiana Temples indicate that those processes are now anticipated to conclude in late 2019 rather than mid-to-late 2019.  Additionally, new information on the Washington DC Temple indicates that the completion of its' renovation process is anticipated in the latter half of 2020, which more or less confirms my previously-offered estimate of mid-to-late 2020.

Until further information indicates otherwise, I also stand by my previously-offered estimate of early-to-mid 2020 for the Tokyo Japan Temple, and mid-to-late 2020 for the Mesa Arizona Temple. And I still strongly suspect that the Mesa Arizona Temple's renovation will be completed prior to the completion of renovation work on the Washington DC Temple. I also continue to stand by my estimate of early-to-mid 2021 for the completion of the renovation of the Hamilton New Zealand Temple.

It appears that I will have to yet again revisit my estimates for known temple events very soon, and I will be sure to publish that here once that process is complete. I also have a half-dozen or so other projects still pending for this blog in the near future, but have had to defer work on those while I continue to recover from my procedure and deal with additional illness. I will be updating you all on my progress on those projects as I figure it all out.

That does it for this post. Any and all comments are, as always, welcome and appreciated, on any post at any time, as long as such comments are made in accordance with the established guidelines. Thank you for the privilege of your time. If you enjoyed what you read here and would like to stay informed of newly-addded content, please feel free to subscribe. Until my next post, I wish each one of you all the best and pray that the Lord will bless you all in everything you do.

5 comments:

  1. Hello again, everyone! Word of another temple update has come in, this one for the Pocatello Idaho Temple, where the process of site leveling and excavation is nearing completion, and conduits have been delivered to the site for carrying utilities. Additionally, there have been other Church news stories reported. First, Sister Joy D. Jones, Primary General President, was the Church-invited guest at the White House today for the National Day of Prayer. Both the official Newsroom and the Church News shared reports about that:

    https://www.mormonnewsroom.org/article/primary-general-president-offers-prayer-white-house

    https://www.thechurchnews.com/leaders-and-ministry/2019-05-02/national-day-of-prayer-white-house-sister-jones-49694

    In the meantime, for the first time, the Church provided a way for women unable to attend the BYU Women's Conference to view some of the proceedings thereof online at home:

    https://www.thechurchnews.com/living-faith/2019-05-01/byu-womens-conference-elder-christofferson-watch-sheri-dew-49691

    Also, reports have been provided about the addresses given by the Relief Society General Presidency and Sister Julie B. Beck, a former Relief Society General President:

    https://www.thechurchnews.com/leaders-and-ministry/2019-05-02/byu-womens-conference-priesthood-relief-society-general-presidency-49701

    https://www.thechurchnews.com/leaders-and-ministry/2019-05-02/byu-womens-conference-jesus-julie-beck-joseph-smith-49699

    As some of you may be aware, the state of Utah is commemorating 150 years since the day in 1869 when workers laying railroad tracks for the Union Pacific Railroad from the east and the Central Pacific Railroad doing the same from the west completed their work at Promontory Point.

    In this milestone year, the Church, which has operated more than a dozen separate Family History Centers in Ogden, opened a new Family History Center in Ogden that will help provide supplementary assitance to all of those individual facilities:

    https://www.thechurchnews.com/living-faith/2019-05-02/family-search-utah-ogden-history-49697

    I continue to monitor all Church news and temple updates and will be sure to pass word of all major developments along to you all here as I receive them. Thanks again, everyone!

    ReplyDelete
  2. " ... opened a new Family History Center in Ogden that will help provide supplementary assitance to all of those individual facilities"

    This is incorrect. If you read the article they state that the center was made to replace the 40 centers, not support those 40 centers.

    ReplyDelete
  3. I did read the article, every word of it. Upon my first complete read-through, I got that same impression you shared in your comment. But this is the first paragraph of that article: "With its April 30 dedication and May 6 formal opening, the new Ogden Utah FamilySearch Center is augmenting the numerous stake family history centers throughout the city and in surrounding areas." I found no other reference in that article to this center entirely replacing the other centers.

    And given that they use the word "augmenting" rather than replacing, I'd like to share the following link, which shares the dictionary definition of augmenting:

    https://www.google.com/search?q=augmenting&rlz=1C1EJFC_enUS843US843&oq=augmenting&aqs=chrome.0.69i59j0l5.3119j0j7&sourceid=chrome&ie=UTF-8

    Again, if you can point me in that article to the wording you saw indicating this would be a replacement rather than an augmentation, I'd appreciate it. Until then, the wording as I shared above, and the definition of "augmenting" would seem to indicate otherwise. In the meantime, thank you for taking time to comment.

    ReplyDelete
  4. Perhaps, the first time either of you read the article it said this center would replace the 40 others. St the end of the article it says:

    "A previous version of this article incorrectly stated that the new Ogden Utah FamilySearch Center will replace 40 stakes in the area."

    ReplyDelete
  5. coachodeeps, thank you for taking time to comment. In between the time of my last comment and now, I did some more checking on my end, and it appears that the version of the article published on the Church website was more specific:

    https://www.lds.org/church/news/opening-of-new-ogden-utah-familysearch-center-replaces-40-stake-family-history-centers?lang=eng

    And I just looked over the Church News article again. The note that you described, coachodeeps, is on that article, but the wording of the article still seems ambiguous to me. That said, it appears the version on the Church's official website clears up the confusion. Thank you, coachodeeps, for taking time to comment.

    ReplyDelete

In addition to my life-long love for the subjects which I cover in the posts of this blog, I have long held the belief that we can disagree without becoming disagreeable. Differences of opinion are natural, while being disagreeable in expressing those differences is not. And in that sense, I have no desire to close the door on anyone who earnestly desires to contribute to the ongoing dialogue on subjects covered in the posts on this blog.

At the same time, however, I recognize that we live in a time when incivility, discourtesy, unkindness, and even cyber-bullying has regrettably become part of online interactions. With that in mind, while anyone who wishes can comment on anything if they choose to do so, I hereby reserve the right to immediately delete any comments which are critical, unkind, lack civility, or promote prodcuts, services, and values contrary to either the Church, or to the rules of online etiquette.

I'd also like to remind all who comment here that I try to respond personally to each individual comment as I feel is appropriate. Such replies are not meant to end the conversation, but to acknowledge earnest feedback as it is submitted.

And in order to better preserve the spirit and pure intentions for which this blog was established, I also hereby request that anyone not commenting with a regular user name (particularly those whose comments appear under the "Unknown" or "Anonymous" monikers, give the rest of us a name to work with in addressing any replies. If such individuals do not wish to disclose their actual given names, a pseudonym or nickname would suffice.

Any comments made by individuals who opt to not give a name by which they can ber identified may, depending on the substance and tone of such comments, be subject to deletion as well. I would respectfully ask that all of us do all we can to keep the dialogue positive, polite, and without malice or ill-will. May the Lord bless us all in our discussion of these important matters.