Stokes Sounds Off: 7 Additional New Temple Presidents Called

Search This Blog

Leaderboard

Thursday, May 16, 2019

7 Additional New Temple Presidents Called

Hello again, everyone! After a two-week hiatus to cover other developments of a more significant nature, the Church News continues to report on new temple presidents, with the call of 7 more noted today. Each of the seven temples were on my list of those for which a new president was likely to be called this year, and 1 of those temple presidents has been called to serve as the first president for the new Rio de Janeiro Brazil Temple, for which a dedication is anticipated to be held early next year. The first president of that temple is currently serving as a counselor in the Recife Brazil Temple presidency.

Also among these newest 7 are 1 current area seventy (namely, ’Aisake K. Tukuafu, who consequently now will join the list of those area seventies likely to be released in General Conference around 4.5 months from now) 1 former area seventy, and 1 former counselor in the presidency of the same temple for which he will assume oversight.

This brings the number of new temple presidents called to begin serving later this year to a grand total of 56, while it is now more than definite that the first new president will be called for the Arequipa Peru Temple. I say that because a Church member living near that temple reported seeing the cornerstone of that temple, which reads "Erected 2019."  So if that temple is to be dedicated by the end of this year, then its' first president would need to begin his service by that time.

Additionally, I am anticipating the calls of the first presidents for the Winnipeg Manitoba and  Abidjan Côte d'Ivoire Temples, both of which are anticipated to be completed at some point next year. And I now have 12 other temples left on my list of those for which I anticipate that a new president is likely to be called this year. 

Of those 12 temples, 7 have been or are being renovated, or are scheduled to close for renovation later this year. And given that there have been 5 temples thus far which have had new presidents announced (none of which were on my list), I am not ruling out the odds that more surprises may be in store in that respect. 

The Church continues the tradition of calling new presidents for at leat 1/3 of all temples which are either currently in operation or those that will be so within a year from such announcements. Within the next 12-18 months, the number of operating temples is anticipated to rise to either 170 or 171. So the 56 temples which have noww had a new president announced is already 1/3 of that number, and at least 8 others could potentially be announced.

I will be monitoring such announcements and will continue to post updates as I am able to. In the meantime, I have now confirmed that President and Sister Nelson and Elder and Sister Gong have embarked on their Pacific Ministry Tour, with the first stop in Kona Hawaii. Hawaii is apparently 4 hours behind Utah time, so it is now after 2:00 PM there.

If the member devotional at that stop is set for either 6:00 or 7:00 PM Kona time, there may not be a repor published about it until after midnight tonight. If I don't see it by the end of my day today, I will try to pass word along about it ASAP tomorrow. So for now, the updated list of new temple presidents follows below. In order to not disrupt the flow of that information, I will end here and now as I always do:.

That does it for this post. Any and all comments are, as always, welcome and appreciated, on any post at any time, as long as such comments are made in accordance with the established guidelines. Thank you for the privilege of your time. If you enjoyed what you read here and would like to stay informed of newly-added content, please feel free to subscribe. Until my next post, I wish each one of you all the best and pray that the Lord will bless you all in everything you do. 

New presidents have been called for the following temples:
1.      Copenhagen Denmark
2.      Manila Philippines (not anticipated; current president has only served for two years)
3.      Tampico Mexico
4.      Philadelphia Pennsylvania
5.      Spokane Washington
6.      Manhattan New York
7.      Columbia River Washington
8.      St. Paul Minnesota
9.      Jordan River Utah
10.  Medford Oregon
11.  Rexburg Idaho
12.  Provo Utah
13.  London England
14.  Tegucigalpa Honduras (not anticipated; current president has only served for one year)
15.  Johannesburg South Africa
16.  Fort Collins Colorado
17.  Panama City Panama
18.  Nauvoo Illinois
19.  Suva Fiji (not anticipated; current president has only served for one year)
20.  Paris France (not anticipated; current president has only served for two years)
21.  Dallas Texas
22.  Guadalajara Mexico
23.  Gilbert Arizona
24.  Detroit Michigan
25.  Anchorage Alaska
26.  Twin Falls Idaho
27.  Sapporo Japan
28.  Kyiv Ukraine
29.  Columbus Ohio
30.  Calgary Alberta (not anticipated; current president has only served for two years)
31.  Tuxtla Gutierrez Mexico
32.  Ciudad Juarez Mexico
33.  Monterrey Mexico
34.  Idaho Falls Idaho
35.  Orlando Florida
36.  Halifax Nova Scotia
37.  Mexico City Mexico
38.  Santiago Chile
39.  Nashville Tennessee
40.  Merida Mexico
41.  Star Valley Wyoming
42.  Winter Quarters Nebraska
43.  Portland Oregon
44.  Montreal Quebec
45.  Santo Domingo Dominican Republic
46.  Seattle Washington
47.  Campinas Brazil
48.  Perth Australia
49.  Curitiba Brazil
50.  Melbourne Australia
51.  Chicago Illinois
52.  Reno Nevada
53.  Seoul Korea
54.  Cochabamba Bolivia
55.  Rio de Janeiro Brazil (first president)
56.  Hartford Connecticut


The first presidents will likely be announced for the following new temples:
1.      Arequipa Peru
2.      Winnipeg Manitoba
3.      Abidjan Côte d'Ivoire

List of currently-operating temples which may be getting a new president in 2019:
1.      Aba Nigeria
2.      Birmingham Alabama
3.      Fresno California
4.      Hamilton New Zealand (Note: It is possible that the Church could hold off on calling a new president for this temple until its’ rededication is held in 2021)
5.      Hong Kong China (Note: It is possible that the Church could hold off on calling a new president for this temple until its’ rededication in 2021 or 2022)
6.      Lima Peru
7.      Memphis Tennessee (Note: Since the current president of this temple had his service interrupted by its’ renovation, the Church could hold off another year or two on replacing him.)
8.      Oklahoma City Oklahoma (Note: Since the current president of this temple had his service interrupted by its’ renovation, the Church could hold off another year or two on replacing him.)
9.      Raleigh North Carolina (Note: Since the current president of this temple had his service interrupted by its’ renovation, the Church could hold off another year or two on replacing him.)
10.  St. George Utah (Note: Since this temple is scheduled to close for renovation later this year, the Church could hold off on calling a new president until the renovation is complete)
11.  Veracruz Mexico
12. Washington D.C. (Note: Since the current president of this temple had his service interrupted by its’ renovation, the Church could hold off another year or two on replacing him.)


9 comments:

  1. Hello again, everyone! I wanted to post a comment here to note additionally that the Church has announced changes that will be coming to its' mobile apps and channels. Again, as President Nelson reminded us at least twice last year, this is not a rebranding: it is an earnest, committed, large-scale effort to refer to the Church and its' websites and resources without using the terms "Mormon" or "LDS". It appears, however, that it is still acceptable to refer to ourselves as members of the Church by the term "Latter-day Saints", since that term has been employed by President Nelson himself, as well as his apostolic colleauges and the Newsroom. You can read more on the extent of those changes at the web address below:

    https://www.mormonnewsroom.org/article/church-name-alignment

    I would just add that, as with the wide-scale earnest effort to correct website domain names and that of their subpages, these changes will likely be unrolled over the next several months as the webmasters, app developers and technicians, and all those who work with them change the relevant resources to the new names. So we should not be at all surprised that these corrections will take time to be fully accomplished. As anyone who has worked in web or app design and maintenance can tell you, changing the name of any website becomes a bit of a chore, because every subpage, every link, either in-site or external, often need to be changed individually and relinked to all the correct corresponding pages. In other words, unless the process of web design, editing, and maintenance has become progressively easier within the last 1.5 decades or so since I took classes on those subjects in High School (has it really been that long?), then this will take a while. In fact, efforts to carry out such updates may still be underway this time next year, depending on what happens between now and then. The process could be completed more quickly depending largely on how many people are tag-teaming this massive, large-scale effort, but I wanted to remind all of you about the prospect of it taking longer, just so there are no surprises in that respect. Thanks again, everyone! Your ongoing interest and support is much appreciated and greatly valued.

    ReplyDelete
  2. There was also a new Temple President announced for Tonga...a total of 8 new presidents announced.

    ReplyDelete
  3. The weird thing is that I mentioned the new president above (as he is the one among this group who is a current area seventy), but the temple in question did not make it on to this list. To whom may I offer thanks for catching that error on my part?

    ReplyDelete
  4. You can call me Patzicia --- a small town in Guatemala.

    ReplyDelete
  5. I will do that. Thank you, Patzicia. Since I have habitually engaged personally with those who comment here with a response from me in reply to every comment, it has been difficult at times to do that when comments are made under the "Unknown" or "Anonymous" monikers. And in that respect, if you could, may I ask in return that you include that name with all comments you leave here in the future, so that I will always know which of these comments are made by you? That would really help me out. Also, are you the one who has commented on living and working in Central America? If so, then I have more feedback to thank you for than just for pointing out my oversight in this case. Either way, my regular readers are very good about pointing out such errors, so feel free to let me know if you notice any others, or have any additional feedback for me. I hope all my readers know how much their feedback means to me personally. Thanks again for pointing out this oversight on my part.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Yes, I have made comments about Central America. Patzicia.

      Delete
    2. Good to know. I am in the midst of putting the finishing touches on my list of potential cities in which a temple could be announced in 4.5 months or so during the October 2019 General Conference, and I know you have talked about Coban. I have looked into other potential locations in that area, and I haven't found any other promising locations. Do you know of anything I may need to consider in that respect? Thanks again.

      Delete
  6. I still see a 2nd temple in Guatemala City (perhaps near Villa Nueva) and a temple in Cobán as the greatest needs in Central America. Patzicia.

    ReplyDelete
  7. Patzicia, interestingly enough, when I first started sharing thoughts about potential future temples, Villa Nueva Guatemala had been on my list. Somewhere along the line, I dropped that prospect, but I did have Coban on my list for last conference, along with San Pedro Sula Honduras. Coban remains on my list, and I will do some research on Villa Nueva as well. Thanks for the information.

    ReplyDelete

In addition to my life-long love for the subjects which I cover in the posts of this blog, I have long held the belief that we can disagree without becoming disagreeable. Differences of opinion are natural, while being disagreeable in expressing those differences is not. And in that sense, I have no desire to close the door on anyone who earnestly desires to contribute to the ongoing dialogue on subjects covered in the posts on this blog.

At the same time, however, I recognize that we live in a time when incivility, discourtesy, unkindness, and even cyber-bullying has regrettably become part of online interactions. With that in mind, while anyone who wishes can comment on anything if they choose to do so, I hereby reserve the right to immediately delete any comments which are critical, unkind, lack civility, or promote prodcuts, services, and values contrary to either the Church, or to the rules of online etiquette.

I'd also like to remind all who comment here that I try to respond personally to each individual comment as I feel is appropriate. Such replies are not meant to end the conversation, but to acknowledge earnest feedback as it is submitted.

And in order to better preserve the spirit and pure intentions for which this blog was established, I also hereby request that anyone not commenting with a regular user name (particularly those whose comments appear under the "Unknown" or "Anonymous" monikers, give the rest of us a name to work with in addressing any replies. If such individuals do not wish to disclose their actual given names, a pseudonym or nickname would suffice.

Any comments made by individuals who opt to not give a name by which they can ber identified may, depending on the substance and tone of such comments, be subject to deletion as well. I would respectfully ask that all of us do all we can to keep the dialogue positive, polite, and without malice or ill-will. May the Lord bless us all in our discussion of these important matters.