First, the Church has further updated the dress and grooming standards for missionaries. In mosquito-infested area where the Zika virus may be contracted, sister missionaries are now being allowed to wear slacks instead of skirts. Contrary to popular interpretation, these changes will not affect the fact that sister missionaries still need to wear skirts and dresses to Church, the temple, and during seasons when mosquitoes are not out in the air. That information can be found by clicking on this link, which will also list Elder Gregory A. Schwitzer of the Seventy's assignment as Assistant Executive Director of the Church Missionary Department, which I did not know before.
Second, Matthew Martinich has posted a major update on stakes and districts that have been created or discontinued within the past month. You can find that post by clicking on this link. Among those created are the first stakes in Benin and the Czech Republic, and additional stakes created in Argentina, Arizona, Australia, Bolivia, the Democratic Republic of the Congo, Nigeria, Tennessee, Utah. A district has been reinstated in Ukraine, and a stake has been discontinued in Idaho, while a district has been discontinued in Papua New Guinea.
Third, more temples have had a new president announced, and I have analyzed how recently each temple has had a change in presidents. I have drawn up an improved list of temples that have received a new president and temples that may yet have a new president announced this year. Here's the list:
Temples getting a new president in 2016:
1.
Nashville Tennessee
2.
Fort Collins Colorado
3.
Star Valley Wyoming
4.
Hartford Connecticut
5.
Philadelphia Pennsylvania
6.
Columbia River Washington
7.
Chicago Illinois
8.
Mexico City Mexico
9.
Hong Kong China
10. London
England
11. Manhattan
New York
12. Medford
Oregon
13. Dallas
Texas
14. Birmingham
Alabama
15. Seattle
Washington
16. Hamilton
New Zealand
17. Cochabamba
Bolivia
18. Gilbert
Arizona
19. Anchorage
Alaska
20. Curitiba
Brazil
21. Kyiv
Ukraine
22. Panama
City Panama
Temples that may still get a new president this year:
1.
Aba Nigeria
2.
Campinas Brazil
3.
Ciudad Juarez Mexico
4.
Columbus Ohio
5.
Copenhagen Denmark
6.
Detroit Michigan
7.
Frankfurt Germany
8.
Fresno California
9.
Guadalajara Mexico
10. Halifax
Nova Scotia
11. Johannesburg
South Africa
12. Lima
Peru
13. Melbourne
Australia
14. Memphis
Tennessee
15. Merida
Mexico
16. Monterey
Mexico
17. Montreal
Quebec
18. Nauvoo
Illinois
19. Nukualofa
Tonga
20. Perth
Australia
21. Provo
Utah
22. Quetzaltenango
Guatemala
23. Raleigh
North Carolina
24. Reno
Nevada
25. Rexburg
Idaho
26. St.
George Utah Temple
27. St.
Paul Minnesota
28. Santiago
Chile
29. Santo
Domingo Dominican Republic
30. Sapporo
Japan (will be dedicated on August 21)
31. Seoul
Korea
32. Spokane
Washington
33. Tampico
Mexico
34. Tuxtla
Gutierrez Mexico Temple
35. Twin
Falls Idaho
36. Winter
Quarters Nebraska
No comments:
Post a Comment
In addition to my life-long love for the subjects which I cover in the posts of this blog, I have long held the belief that we can disagree without becoming disagreeable. Differences of opinion are natural, while being disagreeable in expressing those differences is not. And in that sense, I have no desire to close the door on anyone who earnestly desires to contribute to the ongoing dialogue on subjects covered in the posts on this blog.
At the same time, however, I recognize that we live in a time when incivility, discourtesy, unkindness, and even cyber-bullying has regrettably become part of online interactions. With that in mind, while anyone who wishes can comment on anything if they choose to do so, I hereby reserve the right to immediately delete any comments which are critical, unkind, lack civility, or promote prodcuts, services, and values contrary to either the Church, or to the rules of online etiquette.
I'd also like to remind all who comment here that I try to respond personally to each individual comment as I feel is appropriate. Such replies are not meant to end the conversation, but to acknowledge earnest feedback as it is submitted.
And in order to better preserve the spirit and pure intentions for which this blog was established, I also hereby request that anyone not commenting with a regular user name (particularly those whose comments appear under the "Unknown" or "Anonymous" monikers, give the rest of us a name to work with in addressing any replies. If such individuals do not wish to disclose their actual given names, a pseudonym or nickname would suffice.
Any comments made by individuals who opt to not give a name by which they can ber identified may, depending on the substance and tone of such comments, be subject to deletion as well. I would respectfully ask that all of us do all we can to keep the dialogue positive, polite, and without malice or ill-will. May the Lord bless us all in our discussion of these important matters.